|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Cocoa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:17 PM Original message |
100% of "no" votes were Dems! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
1. Jeffords is independent. But there were no Rethugs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coreystone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Rice and Gonzales.....Jim's got two good votes in a row! ... eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Good for Jeffords, bad for us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:37 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Most Excellent, And DISTURBING Point !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
2. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Jeffords voted no. He's an independent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coreystone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
5. I am still confused by Spector's "bi-partisan" support statement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Im with Rosey (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
7. Let's not overlook what's really important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
8. What Happened To Chafee ??? - Or McCain For That Matter ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dandrhesse (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 06:50 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Please, please check out McCain's record, he is not a friend of Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
9. that is a good way to frame this- but no free passes for Pro-Bush DEMS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
10. This is why you're aces with me, Cocoa. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
11. Yup, the Republicans OWN the PRO-TORTURE position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
12. I could never be a Republican-at least most Dems salvaged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
15. It's good that for the most part . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dandrhesse (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
16. that's why i was hoping all the dems would vote no, so the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 06:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. yes - the GOP stands alone with their stamp of approval on torture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC