Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

4yrs ago this week, Bush is handed the Hart-Rudman Report on Global Terror

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 05:29 PM
Original message
4yrs ago this week, Bush is handed the Hart-Rudman Report on Global Terror
He refused to read it.

Dick Cheney refused to read it.

Condoleeza Rice refused to read it.

The 2 1/2 year bi-partisan study of worldwide terror, commissioned by Bill Clinton in 1998, was deemed unimportant enough for Bush to read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. I remember them talking of this on the 9/11 hearings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. But you didn't hear any of the news networks give it much notice, didja?
Nope....must keep the dictatortot propped up for the election. Don't let the public know he could have prevented 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are you kidding me? Was America's name on the top of the list?
WTF? Nothing shocks me anymore. How sad is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's the media's disgrace..
that this is known by every man, woman, and child in America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. You do mean "NOT known" don't you?
Because I doubt you could go into a supermarket filled with people and find FIVE of them who know this happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. YES! I just reread that and it was too late
to edit! Sorry!

I'm glad you knew what I meant to write..

"NOT KNOWN BY EVERY MAN, WOMAN, AND CHILD"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. If it was known, even Diebold couldn't have saved him.
Mediawhores: Bush is strong on terror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's Clinton's fault ...

that the report didn't have enough pictures to get Shrub to read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. As Condi said, "Nobody told us to DO anything."
I guess nobody told them to even read it. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. They were told to read it by plenty of people, including Newt Gingrich.
Edited on Sun Feb-06-05 11:21 AM by blm
After 9-11, Gingrich dared to point fingers at their incompetence in the New Yorker, yet for some reason the mainstream media didn't cover his remarks.

Oh yeah....they were busy with anthrax, which just happened to really help BushInc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yep and the mainstream media went
doo doo doo doo doo di di di doo doo doo doo doo
*best Lou Reed*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Chimp put it in the circular file and said, "Cheney, write a new report."
"We don't want no stinking Clinton era report."

And Cheney said, "you betcha, Chimp" and immediately dropped the ball, because he wanted to play the great game, and first he needed his New Pearl Harbor. Which is what he got.

Thanks Dick. You will rot in hell, no doubt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. And what else did they do, immediately upon gaining office?
* They took submarines patrolling in the Persian Gulf, to react to any teror threats, off station.

* They took the Predator surveillance aircraft which was tracking Al-Qaeda terrorists, off duty.

* Made Osama bin Laden and AQ a no-priority.....the word Al-Qaeda is mentioned only once prior to 9/11 by this administration.

* Neglected all of the warnings that they were getting from their terrorist czar, Richard Clarke, including the 8/6/01 CIA Presidential Daily Paper that bluntly told Dimson that OBL would attack US landmarks with planes.

* Spent 43% of his time on vacation.

All which led up to the loss of 3,000 lives on 9/11/01. Yes, this administration is "strong" on terror. What a joke.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. They also received confirmation that BinLaden was behind the USS Cole
bombing in their first week in office. Their response: Nevermind. Let's go make nice with the Taliban and try to bribe them like Texas oilmen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanjnj Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. And Attorney General John Ashcroft...
...ordered his staff to refrain from any further discussion of terrorist attck. After all, without 9/11 under their belts the administration could not have rammed the Patriot Act through Congress, could not have generated credible lies for invading Iraq, and would have had no basis for embarking on a scare campaign to convince voters that maintaining GOP control of the gov't was necessary for national security. Bottom line, Bush would have been handily defeated for a second term. The best strategy for staying in power was to ignore expert advice on the impending threat, sit back, and just wait for an event to happen. This begs the question of exactly why Bush took no decisive action in that Florida classroom, upon hearing of the 2nd plane hitting the WTC. Was it merely incompetence, a lack of leadership, or stalling for other events to unfold? "Mission accomplished", indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-05 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Meanwhile, Ashcroft looked out for number one
And only flew on private planes from mid-July 2001 onwards. Hijackings are for the little people to suffer, not Lord Ashcroft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC