Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

jaw-dropping story about Halliburton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 03:39 AM
Original message
jaw-dropping story about Halliburton
Friday, February 4, 2005
Skeleton Key to the State of the Union (12:16 pm)
In today’s Washington Post, there’s yet another typically jaw-dropping story about Halliburton. The Army has decided not to withhold payments from Cheney’s ex-company, despite the fact that it would be normal policy to do so and that the army’s own auditors suggested it.

Why did Army officials seek to waive the normally required withholding of payments? Well, according to an Army spokesman, one of the reasons was “to maintain our responsibility to the taxpayers.” I LOVE it! The best reason IN FAVOR of withholding payments is put forth as a reason NOT to withhold payments. It’s nice to see that everyone at the Pentagon has picked up on the “How to Deal with the Media” tutorial that Rummy once gave to Wolfowitz: “Begin with an illogical premise and proceed perfectly logically to an illogical conclusion.” In other words, two plus two equals five.

But the real chestnut in this article comes toward the end. I’d been left wondering just what in the hell Bush had in mind when he spoke out forcefully in his State of the Union address against “frivolous asbestos claims.” (Ending these is right up there with reforming Social Security on my personal “National To Do List.”) But the second-to-last sentence in this piece provided me the much sought-after moment of clarity:

“KBR and several other Halliburton subsidiaries are emerging from bankruptcy proceedings related to asbestos litigation.”

Now granted, it’s not quite like tracking down an obscure allusion in, say, Ulysses, but decoding the Bush administration’s rhetoric is not entirely without its own small pleasures.

http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/ittlist/ind/skeleton_key_to_the_state_of_the_union/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Halliburton: Asbestos Cases Done
I guess asbestos-related illnesses are frivolous self-indulgence too!

===
“KBR and several other Halliburton subsidiaries are emerging from bankruptcy proceedings related to asbestos litigation.”

Halliburton: Asbestos Cases Done

HOUSTON, Jan. 3, 2005

(AP) Halliburton Co.'s $4.17 billion settlement of thousands of asbestos claims has been finalized, the company announced Monday.

The Houston-based oil services conglomerate's construction and engineering subsidiary, KBR, and other subsidiaries that filed for bankruptcy protection in December 2003 as part of the settlement have emerged from Chapter 11.

The reorganization plan, which included a $2.775 billion cash payment with the rest in stock to settle 400,000 asbestos and 21,000 silica claims, received court approval in July last year and went into effect this past Friday, Dec. 31. Halliburton said the company anticipates funding trusts to pay the claims by the end of this month.

"The asbestos chapter in Halliburton's history is closed," said Dave Lesar, chairman and chief executive of Halliburton.

Halliburton inherited the claims when the company acquired Dresser Industries, Inc. for $7.7 billion in 1998, during Vice President Dick Cheney's 1995-2000 tenure as CEO. Most of the asbestos claims were filed against a former Dresser subsidiary, Pittsburgh-based Harbison-Walker Refractories Co.

(snip)

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/01/03/national/main664479.shtml

==

Insurers Balk at Halliburton's Asbestos Exit Plan
January 12, 2004

In mid-December 2003, Houston-basedHalliburton Company filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings for several of its subsidiaries, including DII Industries (formerly known as Dresser Industries Inc.) and Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR), in an effort to resolve liabilities related to asbestos and silica claims. However, a group of insurance carriers who say they would be left holding much of the payout bag for Halliburton's settlement responded with a request for the court to put the brakes on Halliburton's plan.

The bankruptcy proceedings were filed in Pittsburgh, Pa., according to an announcement released by Halliburton on Dec. 16, 2003. The company said the affected subsidiaries will continue to be wholly owned by Halliburton and will continue normal operations. Halliburton's Energy Services Group and KBR's government services
business are not part of the bankruptcy filing.

The petition evolved from a proposed reorganization plan approved by 386,00 asbestos claimants and over 21,000 silica claimants through a voting process. According to the company, of the votes validly cast, over 98 percent of asbestos claimants and over 99 percent of silica claimants accepted the proposed plan. The total amount of the settlement is expected to be over $4 billion.

(snip)

http://www.insurancejournal.com/magazines/southcentral/2004/01/12/features/35718.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Halliburton: wholly owned subsidiary of BushCo
"See, we love... we love freedom. That's what they didn't understand. They hate things; we love things. They act out of hatred; we don't seek revenge, we seek justice out of love."
-George W. Bush (Oklahoma City, Aug. 29, 2002) 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Freedom is slavery, war is peace... etc. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Cheney made an astonishingly stupid decision as CEO of HAL
when he ok'd the purchase of Dresser and other asbestos related companies knowing full well the extent of their asbestos related contingent liabilities. He foolishly thought the risks associated with the suits were no big deal. All this is one of the reasons I always considered the Afghan war and Iraq ways to "legally" bail out HAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodictators Donating Member (977 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. A bargain that figures out to $9,905. per asbestos or silica claim
Edited on Sun Feb-06-05 12:22 PM by nodictators
The above is calculated by $4.17 billion divided by 421,000 victims. These numbers are in the posted article above.

Now, in this tort-reform hell, all that the victims of Dresser/Halliburton need to do is to find doctors who will cure them for those low-ball amounts.

Edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. “to maintain our responsibility to the taxpayers.”
Try as I might, the brain just doesn't grasp the logic.

I may have to avoid DU soon to save my sanity. DU and DUers make sense, but the misadmninistration doesn't.

Black=White.
Day=Night.

HELP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. well, duh
When I saw Dubya broaching the subject of asbestos litigation in front of TV cameras for the first time, I just told my friend 'Wow, that Dresser Industry suit must be killing his Dallas buddies.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hector459 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush is trying to help Hallibuton make their liability payments.
This is yet another outrage that the MSM seems to be ignoring on TV. Why can't the Dems use the huge amount of info out there to to start their own investigations as the Republicans did with Clinton. The shit that Bush and his cronies are pulling is so much more illegal and harmful to the nation than anything Clinton was ever accused of doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomaco-10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's frightening how the cabal just keeps......
rolling along, raping the landscape and screwing the country without even the tiniest bit of resistence from the MSM or the very few elected officials you could count on one hand that will stand up to them.
I've gotten to the point, I don't even blame the MSM anymore. When they do try to report a story with substance, their ratings drop til they bring back salacious, non stop coverage of pedophilia, Hollywood breakups or adulterous murder mysteries in small town Amerika. Sex sells and asbestos is just some pesky product from the 50's that isn't even around anymore, atleast not in their Cul de Sac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Tort reform all about 43's friends
And put Halliburton right at the top of the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. In the SOTU, lawsuits weren't just frivolus, they were 'junk' lawsuits..
like product safety liability.

We are getting screwed left, right, front, center, behind, above, within, without, sideways, and in-between.

As its dumbed down citizens are conditioned for obedience and thank these monsters for the rape.

America is a sick place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC