The results are not at all surprising. Given the opportunity the Iraqis have empowered a fundamentalist theocracy very much in line with their spiritual allies in Iran, complete with the guidnace and blessings of a Grand Ayatollah.
That the media hasn't covered this development for what it was, an electoral uprising by Iraq's Shi'ite pro-Iran majority against the both the U.S. and Western influence in general, is hardly surprising. What is surprising is that the Bush administration gave no indication that they knew this was at least a possibility. As devastating a result as what we are seeing now with the Iraqi vote count should have at least been discussed as something that might happen.
There is one explanation, however. In the 2004 US election the Iraq War was, of course, a huge issue. Casualties were increasing every month, and many were beginning to question what it was we were doing there. Bush needed to sieze upon a bold initiative in order to once again control the debate on this issue.
My question is this: Did the Bush administration cook up the Iraqi election for reasons of domestic political expediancy? In my opinion they certainly must have had a pretty good idea that the victor there could be Grand Ayatollah Ali al Sistani, and that such a development would be devastating for our interests in the region while strengthening those of our decades old foe Iran.
Did Bush sacrifice American interests by cooking up an Iraq election in order to improve his own political fortunes in 2004?