I found the $9 billion "lost" dollars...

[Atman]

Coincidence? Did they think we forgot about Rummy's $9 bil off-books slush fund? How could we forget when so few of us ever really heard about it in the first place? Line those pockets, Bushies, safe in the knowledge that your minions will never, ever question anything you do...

---

Rumsfeld's $9 Billion Slush Fund
By Fred Kaplan
Posted Friday, Oct. 10, 2003, at 2:42 PM PT

Rummy's rainy day fund

For all the debate over President Bush's $87 billion supplemental request for military operations and economic reconstruction in Afghanistan and Iraq, no one seems to have noticed that the sum includes a slush fund of at least $9.3 billion, which Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld can spend pretty much as he pleases.

Last week, the congressional armed services committees—and this week the House Appropriations Committee—marked up the supplemental, excising a few hundred million that Bush had requested for new hospitals, housing, and sanitation. But the committees didn't touch a nickel of the slush fund—and there's a cravenly wink-and-nudge reason why they didn't.

Most of the supplemental request is fairly straightforward: $32 billion to maintain the tempo of military operations, $18 billion for military personnel, $5.1 billion for security and a new Iraqi army, $5.7 billion for electrical power, and so forth.

But deep within, the document proposes the following allowance:

Not less than $1.4 billion, to remain available until expended, may be used, notwithstanding any other provision of law, for payments to reimburse Pakistan, Jordan, and other key cooperating nations, for logistics, military and other support provided, or to be provided, to United States military operations.

First, look closely at those first three words: Not less than. In other words, Rumsfeld could transfer more than $1.4 billion for this purpose—how much more, who can say? The section goes on to say that Rumsfeld must notify the appropriate congressional committees whenever he uses any of this money, and that the payments must be made with the concurrence of the secretary of state. But otherwise, the bill emphasizes that he alone determines how to spend this money "and such determination is final and conclusive."

<snip>

Complete text

[leesa]

1. Well now, ain't that interesting!

[satya]

2. Good find! nt

[Atman]

3. kick in case you missed it this a.m. (nt)

.