|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 07:27 PM Original message |
Poll question: Do you support Hillary Clinton as the Democratic Presidential nominee for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cobaindrain (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. not my first choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
2. I like Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Placebo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
3. Absolutely love her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. Hillary in '08 means 8 years of President Frist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalVoice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
59. Wouldn't it be easier(and alot cheaper)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalVoice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
4. Who here actually thinks Hillary has a chance in hell of winning in '08? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cobaindrain (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 07:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. if she runs against Condi, then yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalVoice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 07:35 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Condi isn't running in '08 for christs sakes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
30. Same thing if she runs against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ABaker (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
53. See |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pippin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
6. I prefer Barbara Boxer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 07:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. I Agree 100%. Barbara Boxer is the Only Democrat with Balls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZootSuitGringo (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:05 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Sorry, but General Clark is a Democrats with rather large set of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:15 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Wouldn't it be better if the General Clark ran as Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:54 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. Well, considering his positions on the issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Howzabout Clark-Schwarzenegger? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:15 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. Actually, I think Hillary/Schwarzenegger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 08:56 AM Response to Reply #39 |
99. You do know that ahnode's a neocon whore, don't you? He works for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 09:22 AM Response to Reply #99 |
103. Yes I do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:32 PM Response to Reply #32 |
45. A lot of people less intelligent than you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:40 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. I have been an admirer of General Clark ever since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 03:07 PM Response to Reply #45 |
126. I think that Clark rumor started because Clark voted for Reagan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 04:49 PM Response to Reply #126 |
137. It was no rumor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 09:57 PM Response to Reply #137 |
144. whoooo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 07:30 PM Response to Reply #137 |
160. No Shit Sherlock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Massacure (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 10:45 PM Response to Reply #32 |
145. Can't do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 04:26 PM Response to Reply #27 |
136. The republicans don't like Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 09:52 PM Response to Reply #136 |
142. My post was intended to be tongue in cheek |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 09:52 AM Response to Reply #19 |
106. You wanna lose in 2008, do you? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 11:48 PM Response to Reply #19 |
147. If Clark were a Republican he would've licked Bush ass in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cestpaspossible (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. He should run for Governor of Arkansas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:34 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. That would be a step down from General of Europe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cestpaspossible (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:56 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Wouldn't it be a step up from what he's doing now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:05 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. "General of Europe." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cestpaspossible (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:09 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Why will no one answer this question? Does Clark have a job? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:11 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. How many people have you asked? If you care that much, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cestpaspossible (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:15 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. You for one. Do you know the answer? Is it really irrelevant? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:21 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. I have this feeling you don't like General Clark very much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cestpaspossible (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:31 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. It's not about me. It's about Clark. Does he have a job? What is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:37 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. It's ALL about you. General Clark doesn't care what your job is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dread Pirate KR Read (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:57 PM Response to Reply #43 |
54. High-level US group to monitor UN work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cestpaspossible (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:24 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. Interesting story, but it doesn't answer the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dread Pirate KR Read (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:56 PM Response to Reply #61 |
70. You could write WesPAC... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 01:43 AM Response to Reply #61 |
83. Jaysus. He is an economist with his own consulting firm in Little Rock. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkySue (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 09:56 AM Response to Reply #61 |
108. Here's a couple of jobs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KathyBee (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 05:50 PM Response to Reply #61 |
141. General Clark's work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 07:16 PM Response to Reply #61 |
156. Have you lost your mind??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkySue (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 01:02 PM Response to Reply #43 |
120. Yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #120 |
121. Welcome ArkySue! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 10:51 PM Response to Reply #38 |
170. GOOGLE is your friend. Use it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 11:45 PM Response to Reply #35 |
74. He does all kinds of things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
julialnyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 07:07 PM Response to Reply #28 |
155. here's yesterday's news talking about what Clark was doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
40. Now There's The Ticket! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:50 PM Response to Reply #40 |
51. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 11:02 AM Response to Reply #51 |
148. Oh My Heavens.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 10:12 AM Response to Reply #40 |
110. He was an Independent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 11:08 AM Response to Reply #110 |
149. Please Read My Reply... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZootSuitGringo (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 03:53 AM Response to Reply #23 |
89. Well that's sound like your opinion, man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 01:31 PM Response to Reply #89 |
122. Welcome zootsuitgringo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 08:57 AM Response to Reply #17 |
100. Don't need any more military people around. Put him in the DOD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 12:33 PM Response to Reply #100 |
119. I'm not a Clarkie, but he's not a Repuke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 07:20 PM Response to Reply #100 |
157. Why don't you do some research?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 10:00 AM Response to Reply #17 |
109. Chutzpah, Maybe. Balls, NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 07:26 PM Response to Reply #109 |
158. Again, mouthing off with no data... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 08:55 AM Response to Reply #6 |
98. Agreed. She is clear and brave. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4_Legs_Good (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
8. I would vote for her, but I'd prefer just about anyone on the list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cobaindrain (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
9. Bayh/Corzine or Edwards/Corzine in 2008 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
10. first I want to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmkinsey (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
12. Senators not good presidential choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Name one of our people they don't have a hot hatred for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 12:00 PM Response to Reply #16 |
153. Just Signed Up With You |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:30 PM Response to Reply #12 |
24. Agree. Need someone with no record for them to pick at. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 04:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
133. She'd motivate me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benddem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
13. I love Hillary but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZootSuitGringo (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
14. I say Gen. Wes Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
borg5575 (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 03:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
130. No way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
borg5575 (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 03:38 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. More thoughts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 07:27 PM Response to Reply #130 |
159. And who is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
independentchristian (393 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
15. If the Democrats and the media coronate her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalVoice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:20 PM Response to Reply #15 |
60. I'm leaving the fucking country if they nominate her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jen4clark (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
18. I will endlessly work for fair elections and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 01:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
123. Welcome jen4clark! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jen4clark (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 08:07 PM Response to Reply #123 |
163. You're a sweethert. Thank you! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
20. Clark. Hillary endorsed fraud on January 6. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
21. Edwards/Clark or Edwards/Boxer or Edwards/Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
46. Edwards' voting record is THE SAME as Clinton's record. EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:17 PM Response to Reply #46 |
58. No, Edwards has a much more liberal rating than does Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 10:38 AM Response to Reply #58 |
114. Give it a rest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elsiesummers (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 12:43 AM Response to Reply #46 |
81. Edwards is Liberal - that's why Repubs hate him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 12:26 PM Response to Reply #81 |
118. That's right, Edwards is a liberal leaning populist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 12:22 PM Response to Reply #46 |
117. Actually, Hillary didn't CO-SPONSOR IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 03:08 PM Response to Reply #117 |
127. Clark did, he had the same position as Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 09:19 PM Response to Reply #127 |
167. And what position did Clark have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 10:08 PM Response to Reply #167 |
168. :) Yes, Clark's position was a wise one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
22. An emphatic Hell No! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dread Pirate KR Read (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
26. Gallop will say anything in USA Today,..and their beloved NeoContry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
31. I do not have a candidate for 2008 at this point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elsiesummers (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 12:32 AM Response to Reply #31 |
80. I agree - way too early to pick a candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
34. I Don't Understand The Support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:45 PM Response to Reply #34 |
69. I know what you mean, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemGirl7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
36. I like Hillary...but I don't really support her as presidential candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
41. Gallup has Clinton at 40%, Kerry at 25% and Edwards at 17%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 01:46 AM Response to Reply #41 |
85. CNN said it. Probably a lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 08:49 AM Response to Reply #85 |
96. You did not answer. Where did you get the 70% figure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 04:59 PM Response to Reply #96 |
138. Cnn announcer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
housewolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
44. Too soon to decide... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Andy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
48. Edwards, a southern moderate, like it or not, is our best chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
49. I won't vote for Clinton. EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zann725 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 04:10 AM Response to Reply #49 |
91. Neither would I! EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ABaker (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
52. I say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalVoice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:12 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. And how many people in the woirld get to vote in our elections? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevebreeze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
55. Hillery is not very progressive though she would be treated as so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
57. I want Boxer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bling bling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
62. I can't think of a single candidate that would piss off the Repubs more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
63. The question I have for anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Synnical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
64. Al Gore? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigMatto (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 12:30 AM Response to Reply #64 |
79. Sure... if... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Synnical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 11:29 PM Response to Reply #79 |
146. Allowing his wife? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnOneillsMemory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
65. BBV means we can't vote. Half the country HATES any Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frankly_fedup2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
66. Until somebody sets up a unified voting system that can be trusted and ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silverhair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 11:14 PM Response to Reply #66 |
71. That quote belongs to Stalin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueInRed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
67. If we're going for electable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elsiesummers (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 01:07 AM Response to Reply #67 |
82. Electable - I wonder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueInRed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 10:57 AM Response to Reply #82 |
115. I know a lot of people who wouldn't vote for her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stackhouse (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
68. wes clark rocks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silverhair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
72. Hillary will be a disaster if she get the nomination in 08. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
73. WTF with all the Clark envy lately?!?!?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZootSuitGringo (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 03:55 AM Response to Reply #73 |
90. Don't let any of this upset you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigMatto (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
75. Clark is utterly unelectable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dread Pirate KR Read (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 11:52 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Aiye,... thens I won't trust ya... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigMatto (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 11:55 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Er... OK... I guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 10:11 PM Response to Reply #75 |
169. What evidence do you have for that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddy Waters Guitar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
78. Hillary has become dangerous for the Democratic Party--- has to be stopped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildEyedLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 02:32 AM Response to Reply #78 |
86. Great post and welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
googly (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 01:46 AM Response to Original message |
84. Comparing Hillary to Clark is like comparing a diamond with charcoal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 03:35 AM Response to Reply #84 |
88. Yes, I remember the remark Clark made about Kerry, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
googly (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 04:00 PM Response to Reply #88 |
132. I will enthusiastically support Clark only after he runs for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 07:35 PM Response to Reply #84 |
161. Did you even see it?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 03:34 AM Response to Original message |
87. I'd really, really rather she wasn't. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romberry (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 05:02 AM Response to Original message |
92. If Hillary is the nominee, we lose. Again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreeStateDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
93. She cannot win and will split the party because of personal ambition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CWebster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
94. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DistressedAmerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
95. She Is My Senator And Will Never Get My Vote Again For ANYTHING! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
infusionman (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
97. The Repukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mizmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 09:25 AM Response to Reply #97 |
104. really? What can they do to her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CWebster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 10:22 AM Response to Reply #104 |
113. Actually, it works better on women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
101. I don't support anyone right now. Period. My sights are on '06. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
102. She's too friendly with the PNACers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrateCitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
105. I'd vote 3rd party if she ran -- and she's my Senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jen4clark (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 09:06 PM Response to Reply #105 |
164. I'm surprised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hippiechick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
107. I admire Hillary but ... NEVER as a Presidential Candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
111. How about undecided on all counts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
112. She's great, can't win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalVoice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
116. Well if DU is any indication... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 03:03 PM Response to Reply #116 |
125. I'd support her as nominee... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
124. opposed-she won't win in any version of reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
128. We would get our asses stomped THOUROUGHLY . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ladyhawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
129. I don't want Hillary, but I would vote for her if she were the only... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
134. I do like Hillary but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
In Truth We Trust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
135. No too DLC for me. BTW, How democratic of you to not allow for a choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
139. Five reasons she would get 30% of the vote in the general election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
140. Actually, Gallup said 40% did, not 70%. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seahawky (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-10-05 09:55 PM Response to Reply #140 |
143. Edwards 2008 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpaceBuddy008 (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
150. photo of W. Clark in PNAC manual! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 11:49 AM Response to Reply #150 |
151. Unbelievable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 11:50 AM Response to Reply #150 |
152. The awful truth about Clark and mind control. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 07:56 PM Response to Reply #152 |
162. I must confess... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 09:15 PM Response to Reply #162 |
166. How dare he! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 01:36 PM Response to Reply #150 |
154. A new one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 09:09 PM Response to Reply #150 |
165. Paul Krugman also did consulting for Enron. Then exposed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-11-05 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
171. Locking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC