Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"...according to a previously undisclosed report from...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:16 AM
Original message
"...according to a previously undisclosed report from...
... the 9/11 commission"? Helloooooo! Why did the 9-11 commission wait until now to disclose this? It's the headline story in today's NYT. It should have been headlines 12 months ago....

<snip>
The New York Times

February 10, 2005
9/11 Report Cites Many Warnings About Hijackings
By ERIC LICHTBLAU

WASHINGTON, Feb. 9 - In the months before the Sept. 11 attacks, federal aviation officials reviewed dozens of intelligence reports that warned about Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda, some of which specifically discussed airline hijackings and suicide operations, according to a previously undisclosed report from the 9/11 commission.

But aviation officials were "lulled into a false sense of security," and "intelligence that indicated a real and growing threat leading up to 9/11 did not stimulate significant increases in security procedures," the commission report concluded.

The report discloses that the Federal Aviation Administration, despite being focused on risks of hijackings overseas, warned airports in the spring of 2001 that if "the intent of the hijacker is not to exchange hostages for prisoners, but to commit suicide in a spectacular explosion, a domestic hijacking would probably be preferable." <more>

<link> http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/10/politics/10terror.html?th

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. This can't be true

Condi says there were no warnings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You're right, okay everyone, heads back in the sand!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think the Mojave will be big enough

we may have to lease the Sahara
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Condi lied again? I'm shocked, Shocked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Lied Between her teeth

It takes a whole lot of lies to fill that space. What did we expect ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thay waited because of an executive order from the Whitehouse
according to the reports I heard this AM on AAR news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. I was always suspicious of Bush heading off to the Ranch
for the entire month of August--not even a year after grabbing the Whitehouse. I can recall watching an interview with him at the time and discussing with someone that something was up - he was cowering and hiding from something.


After all, it wasn't the first time they targeted the WTC.

Unfortunately, this news will be buried, or contradicted by propaganda- like things hidden on the financial page clashing what is promoted on the editorial page.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. This was the report we were trying to get them to release last August
They had this report then but blivet** refused to allow them to release it then. Guess we know exactly why now. Keeping us safer AFTER THE FACT. LIHOP seems more and more less :tinfoilhat: now doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Bushbots want to celebrate this man's "leadership," yet he
"leads" the most incredibly, unbelievably INCOMPETENT administration history has known.

Forget the nasty, clever names. Just repeat the word "incompetent" every chance you get when discussing this adminisrtration or anyone in it.

Nothing will take the polish off of Bush like his being thought of as incompetent. Nothing.

And he's the "incompetent" leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Too true. Other words that apply:
Coward, immoral, confused, unprincipled, oversensitive, failure, fragile, faint-hearted, nervous, sad, boneheaded, feeble, puny, fearful, dependent, vulnerable, inadequate, trivial, unimportant, petty, juvenile, scared, frightened, worried, edgy, cheerless, distressed, uncontrolled, bitter, gloomy, hysterical, delusional, repressed, browbeaten, demoralized, conquered, loser, disappointment, overwhelmed, pessimistic, hapless, indecisive, bawling, baffled, befuddled, dishonorable, shameful, disgraceful, easily upset, thin-skinned, hypersensitive, ineffective, ridiculous, absurd, mediocre, embarrassment, unimpressive, incompetent, incapable, deficient, lacking, undisciplined, unfortunate, awkward, babbling, inept, clumsy, flailing, humiliated, disgraced.

--From a nice article on framing: http://www.politicalstrategy.org/archives/001120.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC