|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
UrbScotty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 06:01 PM Original message |
Poll question: Where does Gephardt's labor support go? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rbrussell (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. It Goes Everywhere -NT- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
displacedtexan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
2. I heard... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. Most of the labor support was already divvied up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TopesJunkie (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 06:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. True. Gephardt's Unions will likely pick and choose -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 06:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. If Iowa voters were any indication, all of the candidates would likely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UrbScotty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 06:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. I'm talking about the support Gephardt had. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 09:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. So it naturally follows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tryanhas (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
6. That poll is nothing more than a popularity contest! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TopesJunkie (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 06:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. How would Gephardt's unions go to Edwards on caucus night? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 06:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. my point is (as made by others) Gephardt thought he would get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TopesJunkie (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 07:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Umm. Yeah, that's what I said already -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
11. Kucinich has the edge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LuminousX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
12. Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UrbScotty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 09:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Huh? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anti-bush (397 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
13. What I heard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 10:30 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. I think the union vote may go to Clark because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ajacobson (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
17. Nobody until March |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corporatewhore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
18. maybe not official endoresment but i think kucinch becuase |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnKleeb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-04 10:57 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. If we get them, that would be great CW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
20. Kucinich, then Edwards have the highest labor ratings. Kerry is third. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC