Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Lautenberg writes to Scotty:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:01 PM
Original message
Senator Lautenberg writes to Scotty:
Edited on Thu Feb-10-05 04:01 PM by caligirl
Dear Mr. McClellan,

I am writing to request that you immediately release documents to my office relating to the White House press credentials of James D. Guckert, a.k.a. "Jeff Gannon." Specifically, I am seeking documentation related to the question of which name Mr. Guckert/Gannon used when applying for credentials, and which name was on the official White House press credentials he received. Additionally, I am seeking documents indicating whether Mr. Guckert/Gannon received a "hard pass" or daily passes from your office. Despite your assertions to the contrary, at least one White House reporter has revealed that Mr. Guckert/Gannon appeared to have "hard pass" credentials.

As you may know, Mr. Guckert/Gannon was denied a Congressional press pass because he could not show that he wrote for a valid news organization. Given the fact that he was denied Congressional credentials, I seek your explanation of how Mr. Guckert/Gannon passed muster for White House press credentials.

I have led the effort in the Senate to investigate a number of instances of troubling propaganda efforts by the Administration. The Government Accountability Office has agreed to my requests to investigate various attempts at media manipulation: fake television news stories touting both the new Medicare law and the "No Child Left Behind" education program; a study rating individual journalists on their "favorability" to Republican education policies; and the payment to journalist Armstrong Williams.

Since the Armstrong Williams controversy became public, Administration payments to two other journalists, Maggie Gallagher and Michael McManus, have come to light. Given the backdrop of these scandals, coupled with Mr. Guckert/Gannon's role in recent White House press briefings and press conferences, it is understandable that the circumstances of Mr. Guckert/Gannon's credentialing have raised suspicion.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely, Frank R. Lautenberg

http://atrios.blogspot.com/

dated Feb 10 2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Magleetis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. We might
get lucky and get the truth on this one. Very cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, it's on baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbartch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Goooooooooooooooooooo Senator Lautenberg
I'm forwarding this to WYDEN and SMITH from Oregon

and to all the DEMS and media I have in my address book!!!

================================================================

Each of us should send this out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressiveandproud Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. I love the...
...thank you, in advance, for McClellan's cooperation. I don't see Sen. Lautenberg getting what he wants, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, I'm inclined to think that way too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Go Frank!!!
Prove that he was a plant and was there purely for propaganda purposes! And find the money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. And Bush MUST have KNOWN!
Bush knew who to turn to to bail him out when the press started to ask the "wrong" questions.

Bush KNEW what Gannon was there for.

This SHOULD be Bush's Watergate.

All we need now is a blue dress, and he's cooked.

Play this one up with letters to the editors.

We can NOT let this one go!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Or a "Frank Wills"..
"The nation owes a huge debt of gratitude to Frank Wills, the courageous Watergate
security guard who alerted authorities to the Watergate break-in on ..."


More at..
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=the+guard+who+alerted+on+watergate&btnG=Google+Search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbartch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Well.....here is Jeffy in his SPIFFY WHITE SHORTS
I realize he isn't in a pretty blue dress...........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. Here's how I know that there is a relationship to the WH
Gannon told Wolf on CNN that his real name was used to gain access to the press briefing room. As I recall, every time Gannon was call on by Scottie or the pResident, they called him Jeff, not Jim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good luck with that Frank. I think it will take a subpeona, though to pry
that information out of Scotty's cold dead hands. No doubt the pertinent records have already been "accidentially" shredded. Oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Judy Woodruff just did report on Gannon
Edited on Thu Feb-10-05 04:21 PM by Quakerfriend
And, she said atleast 3 times that he was on a DAILY pass.

And, that "Scott C. says that he wants nothing to do with deciding on who gets to be in the WH PC."

This stinks to high heaven, and hope that Frank L. will follow it all the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. So...if the Press Secretary isn't in on deciding who gets to be in
WHO DOES?

I believe there are a couple of handfuls of questions that are needing to be asked of THAT person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alvis Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yeah, I suppose the Press Secretary has nothing to do with
deciding who gets into the press conferences.


:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. So you get to use as FAKE name for the daily pass?
What's the difference? You could still be a threat on one day if your name is suspicious or not good enough to be cleared. And who issues the day passes? The secretary at the door?!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Wait, isn't he the 'WH Press Secretary'?
and he doesn't want anything to do with who gets to be in PC? I thought that was part of his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Beeeutiful!
No Congressional press pass-okay-so only tricky Dick, Rove or Bush is letting him in. Bingo baby! Oh go get 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. They think they don't have the Country
hornswaggled Enough! They have to bring in ol' Guck-ert for reinforcements!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Gannon will be on with WBlitzer next
Let's see how they try to spin this one!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Yesterday Blitzer had Howie Kurtz and the spin was beyond belief
Nothing about fake ID and the security breach he represents - who got him in?
Nothing about being a propaganda plant given precedence over real journalists
Nothing about the pimping for military personnel prostitution
Nothing about ANY of the important points.

Instead, Howie was blowing about how poor "Gannon" had his privacy invaded so unfairly by those nasty "liberal bloggers," just because of his political beliefs. The implication is that the only shameful thing is that "Gannon" is homosexual -- which is of course the only NON-shameful thing. "Gannon" and Talon under his direction were very busy pushing virulent anti-gay propaganda, so the hyprocrisy level is out of sight. Needless to say, Howie didn't mention that, either.

It was a totally, absolutely propaganda performance. Having "Gannon" himself on is setting up for more of the same, like the Swift Vote Liars being given a serious media platform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tgnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yeah man! Get all up in his grill!
I hope Lautenberg and Slaughter are working together on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. Go For It, Senator Lautenberg!
I know ya'll can imagine the Arrogance of these assholes when they got ol' guck-ert a press pass! And was it a "hard pass"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. That's my man!
I am so proud of my senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Your Senators R.O.C.K.!!!
I wish mine did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. State of Delaware vs. James D. Guckert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. Today's WhiteHouse Press gaggle with Scotty
Q Jeff Gannon. How did he get a White House pass, or what kind of credentials did he have?

MR. McCLELLAN: Just like anyone else who comes to the White House.

Q Hard pass?

MR. McCLELLAN: No, he had never applied for a hard pass. He had a daily pass. I think he's been coming for --

Q Was he coming for --

MR. McCLELLAN: Hang on. I think he's been coming for more than two years now.

Q Under what name?

MR. McCLELLAN: Sorry?

Q Under what name?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, you have to get cleared. You have to -- just like anybody else that comes to the White House, you have to have your full name, your Social Security number and your birth date. So you have to be cleared just like anybody else.

Q So he was being cleared under James Guckert, or whatever his name is?

MR. McCLELLAN: My understanding, yes.

Q Okay, and how did he get picked to get a question asked at the last news conference?

MR. McCLELLAN: He didn't. The President didn't have a list. The President didn't -- he was in the briefing room. There are assigned seats in the briefing room. We didn't do any assigning of seats, and the President worked his way through the rows, and called on people as he came to them. He doesn't know who he is.

Q Were you aware that he had another name?

MR. McCLELLAN: Was I aware? I had heard that. I had heard that, yes, recently.

Q But did you know during all this time that he really wasn't Jeff Gannon?

MR. McCLELLAN: I heard at some point, yes -- previously.

Q As Press Secretary, what do you think about this whole --

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, like I said -- what do I think about it? Well, let me explain a few things. First, as the press secretary, I don't think it's the role of the Press Secretary to get into picking or choosing who gets press credentials. Also, I don't think it's the role of the Press Secretary to get into being a media critic, and I think there are very good reasons for that. I've never inserted myself into the process. He, like anyone else, showed that he was representing a news organization that published regularly, and so he was cleared two years ago to receive daily passes, just like many others are. The issue comes up -- it becomes, in this day and age, when you have a changing media, it's not an easy issue to decide or try to pick and choose who is a journalist. And there -- it gets into the issue of advocacy journalism. Where do you draw the line? There are a number of people who cross that line in the briefing room.

And, as far as I'm concerned, I would welcome the White House Correspondents Association, if they have any concerns or issues that they want to bring to my attention, they know my door is open and I'll be glad to discuss these issues with them. I have an open dialogue with the Correspondents Association. No one's ever brought such an issue to my attention, in my -- during my time as being Press Secretary. And you all cover the briefing room on a regular basis. You know that there are a number of people in that room that express their points of view, and there are people in that room that represent traditional media, they represent talk radio, they represent -- they're columnists, and they represent online news organizations.

Q Was the White House aware at all -- was the White House aware -- was the White House aware at all about the online websites that he was linked to?

MR. McCLELLAN: No. This has only come to my attention through the news reports, just a few reporters calling in.

Q But just to make it clear, the only criteria, from the White House perspective is, someone can pass the Secret Service background check

MR. McCLELLAN: No, no, that's not -- first of all, I don't involve myself in that process, it's handled at a staff level. Like I said, if the White House Correspondents Association ever wants to talk about issues, I welcome that. But it becomes an issue -- it becomes an issue of where do you draw the line? Do you draw the line at advocacy journalism because there are a number of people that crossed that line, as I said? But there's hard -- there's hard passes and there's daily passes, as you are well aware. For a hard pass, you have to have a House and Senate credential, you have to regularly cover the White House, you have to apply for it, you have to go through a detailed FBI background check.

My understanding was, when he started coming to the White House about two years ago, the staff asked to see that it -- that he represented a news organization that published regularly. And they showed that, so he was cleared and has been cleared ever since based on that time.

And this is just now something that's come to my attention more recently because it's been an issue raised in some media reports.

Q Scott, one other question, separate subject. The FAA report on the 52 pieces of information that they had, the administration, apparently, just filed the report a couple of weeks ago to the Archives. Why did it wait so long to come out?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, I think you'd have to talk to the Justice Department. The Justice Department was the liaison for working with the 9/11 Commission on classification issues related to reporting. My understanding was this was a report that was given to the Justice Department at the last minute of when they completed their work. And we provided unprecedented cooperation to the 9/11 Commission --

Q For --

MR. McCLELLAN: Hang on -- unprecedented cooperation to the 9/11 Commission, and we were pleased to do that because their work was very important. And --

Q So it's a matter of declassifying -- that's what --

MR. McCLELLAN: There are classification issues that have been involved in the process before. It's involved in the report itself. And I know that we always encourage people to work quickly to do the classification review that were handled, essentially, by career officials within the various departments. And you'd have to ask the Justice Department about this one. But my understanding was that it was something that was given to them very late in the process. And then they worked to go through those issues with other respective agencies, I assume, and -- so that the report could be released, that portion of -- that addition to -- I should say, that addition -- the addition to the report that they provided. But you have to ask Justice Department specifics.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050210-6.html#4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Carolyn Guckert: Any relation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC