|
Edited on Fri Feb-11-05 02:37 PM by jswordy
And that's being kind!
The only problem with culling from the Web is, unless your local paper has a site, you miss out on tons of local news that way.
On the larger question, small town papers will not save us from anything. They have far fewer resources and are far more dependent on national wires services, and few of the small papers have the bucks to subscribe to more than AP only, let alone hire reporters to cover national issues.
The best mix of news can be had in dailies of over about 150,000 in size. They have the cash to get several wire services and provide a wider view.
I'm in the biz. I think the thesis that the so-called MSM is bought and paid for is fallacious, as do my colleagues in the profession who know how the newsgathering process works and what its relationshiop to the "business side" is at legitimate operations. (Note: Faux News is not a legitimate operation, nor is any Murdoch property.)
There is plenty of high-quality information out there for those who are not lazy and are willing to find it. I find that people who are widely-read have excellent grasps of the issues (no matter their politics), people who read narrowly have good grasps, and people who rely only on broadcast news have poor grasps.
The key is in being your own news hound, and not waiting for someone else to prepackage and predigest it for you. If you read two or three different stories on the same subect, you are then well informed. Two stories? Pretty well informed. One? Basically informed. You say you saw it on TV while making dinner? You are barely aware, then.
Let me also say here that it is good to read from a variety of perspectives, not just from the places that offer a news perspective with which one agrees. It is much more informative to read from a wide-angle view.
I find that, across the board, the level of disgruntlement with the so-called MSM rises dramatically among those who want their news spoonfed to them from the TV screen. And rightly so.
UNDER EDIT: The firm that controls the paper often does not determine the editorial stance of that paper, BTW. Many individual properties are left to determine their own news content. That is certainly true of my paper's owner. And it is true of Gannett. Let me point out that Gannett owns the Appleton conservative paper, and also the Nashville "Tennessean, seen as a liberal "Democratic" paper.
|