|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
59millionmorons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:18 PM Original message |
Bush approval plunges in new Gallup poll, confirming the AP poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qanda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. I figured that one poll was a complete outlier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
classof56 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
2. Uh-oh. Time for another "Pearl Harbor"? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:32 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. "TRIFECTA" is the term Dubya used last time around. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spotbird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Sadly, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 06:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. Gee I wonder where Pearl Harbor will be this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-13-05 04:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
31. I was thinking that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr Rabble (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
3. He wont have to. No one will bother to ask about this in the MSM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
4. The same way that he explained away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
18. John Fund did those things???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 06:06 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. WSJ is not the only media that Fund utilizes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 06:12 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. I know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-13-05 03:40 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. I need to check that arse of yours to see how smart it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 06:24 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Here are a few links!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
5. It was weird. Yesterday, at the beginning of Inside Politics, Judy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
6. What I Find Interesting Is How Polarized This Country Is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tigress DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
9. http://www.votetoimpeach.org |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bush_Eats_Beef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
10. 49%...THAT'S a MANDATE if I've ever SEEN one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
11. We have to start using the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 07:01 PM Response to Reply #11 |
28. Yes indeed! GREAT idea. Plant those seeds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merwin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
12. Gallup was attempting to skew future numbers in their last poll maybe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patricia92243 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
13. What differance does it make now? The election is over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. The election is but not Bush's push for his regressive policies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Yup. We can use this against him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. No coat tails to hang on to and no solid support to hang their hats on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 05:55 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. It matters because if the Pubs in the House & en see him down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 06:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Not just repugs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tigress DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
19. Shall we take the NEW poll? GWII taking us in the "right" direction? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
borg5575 (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
25. I wouldn't lend much credence to polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFLforever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
26. It's Social Security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elidor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
27. The harder he pushes this social security scam, the lower those numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-12-05 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
29. Here is Rasmussen's numbers: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC