Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, can we call it civil war yet?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:08 PM
Original message
So, can we call it civil war yet?
Aw, come on. Shiites are getting hit right and left. The final announcement of the "election" results is being put off and off. It's a mess, and there are plenty of incidents yet to come, whether we hear all of them or not.

Tick tick tick.

Meanwhile, we blunder on with the destabilizing of Syria and Iran and muck around who knows where else.

Anyone care to predict?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. When I read the posting on the main page, I thought you were talking
about the US.

My answer would have been yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. ME TOO!
I am estranged from my oldest Son because of this President! If this can happen to a Mom and her Son, yes, we can have a Civil War right here at home!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I see a light at the end of the
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo05 Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope you are not hoping for that to happen.
It would be terrrible for Iraq and for the region as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Surely you aren't serious asking that question, are you??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo05 Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I am serious...
...only because of the way your post is presented. Forgive me, I am new here. I am not familiar with when some people are serious or not serious...joking or not joking...hoping for things to go wrong...not hoping for things to go wrong. I know many people who hope something goes qwrong in Iraq so they can use it as further evidence to hate a guy they already hate. (Bush). So forgive me if I somehow insulted you, but I am just curious.

And please quit calling me Shirley! ;p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. sarcasm. no - no one wants it to go badly. Just bring them home now -
and bring them home alive. Why do you know "many people who hope something goes wrong"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo05 Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Perhaps many is a bit of an exageration...
...but some. I know them because I have known them as friends for my whole life. Some of them really want us to fail over there, a view I don't support. But they want us to fail because they think that's the only way we'll get out of there and they believe it will be the downfall of Bush and the GOP. IN other words, they want us to fail for political reasons. Again, not a view I support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Well, I would give it, IMO, about a 90 % chance of failing, so why
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 09:42 PM by Laura PackYourBags
not get out now. That is what Kucinich said during the debates. If there is no good that will come out of this next year, or the year after, or the year after -- why not stop it now.

Trust me on this, though. There is nothing altruistic about the whole thing - since he lied from the beginning. Therefore, its garbage in garbage out. If B** really cared about those Iraqis, he would have done everything humanly possible to resolve the matter of getting rid of Saddam peacefully. Last time I looked 16,000+ est. Iraqis have been killed. If B** carried about people, he'd be in Rwanda or the Congo where millions are dying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
infusionman Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. King George is not gonna get out now...
He's going to use Iraq as a staging area for Iran, Syria...

Then one day he will use DC or New York as a staging area for taking over the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. I have seen references to over 100, 000 Iraqis dead. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RafterMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Actually
someone ran a poll here on DU recently and 2/3rds preferred that Iraq descend into chaos than Bush be credited with a successful policy.

So that hardly qualifies as "no one". At least not here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. well 2/3 of the poll is not 2/3 of DU nor does everyone take a poll
here like a legal commitment, but your point is taken-- I shouldn't have spoken for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Just feel that ball come across the plate and swing, Don't think about
it. That's how the game's played.

Welcome to DU, GocubsGo05. you support lost causes, so you must be a genuine Democrat.

;-) :D :+ O8) :hippie: :toast:

Take me out to the ballgame . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo05 Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. And a genuine Cubs fan. (Speaking of lost causes!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. You hit that one! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
24. I don't WANT that to happen, I'm just a lil' ol' fan of reality
Reality is always our friend, regardless of the immediate pain. Embracing what is actually happening is the first step to correcting the dynamic or adjusting to it as a fait accompli.

Yes, in my heart, I don't want hugs and kisses and a smooth transition to a stable government that can be controlled and dominated by this administration and its allies in mineral extraction and further world dominance.

To the heart and soul of your question, I don't think a "real" representative government with fairness and enlightenment is the least bit possible. If it were possible, I'd be all for it. I'd be thrilled and reassured about humanity.

Holding the lid on horrible situations is much more horrible than letting it boil over somewhat. Letting it go completely is even worse.

The longer lies are buttressed as truth when obviously false, the more people give up on their government and society. The most dangerous thing facing the left in this country today is the cynicism and checking-out by those who can't abide the obvious misrepresentation of reality. Trust in a willingness to embrace reality is necessary in a pluralist society.

'Nuff said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. I figured they were holding off the results so the US could rig it
somehow. Hey, but when the other side doesn't vote, that's pretty hard to do, huh. That would be piece of cake to pull off, I can envision now. "oh, we'll take care of those election ballot boxes -- you need to go out there and kills some insurgents"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'll give it a year before the bunker busters hit Bashere.
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 09:25 PM by leveymg
We've etablished the seeds of democracy in Iraq - I mean the future states of Shi'a W. Iran, S. Kurdistan and the Autonomous Republic of Sunni Central Iraq. Mission accomplished.

Which will be first to buy F-16s? NATO enlargement, anyone? They'll never get their oil production back up to where it was - add $1.50 to the base world price of crude. Permanently. Mission accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. I've been asking that for awhile
We handed over the government to them. We got a signed note from Condi saying they are sovereign.

So if there is fighting going on in Iraq, both sides are the Iraqis, though one has enlisted our support.

If it's not a civil war, what's the distinction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Any chance that Condibush will declare Allawi the winner by a nose?
Do they have the balls & piano keys to attempt a crazy thing like this? Would Fox, Rush, Novak, and Blackwell stand behind them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. good one ! that's why we need to have a 30+% lead next time
You can not rig an election unless it's relatively close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Allawi wins 50.8% and declares himself as having a 'mandate'.
He immediately privatizes everything (or what is left),
Monsanto cracks down on farmers while the oil is sucked dry.


On to Iran but maybe Venezuala!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Oh shit, Exits Wrong Again !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jjtss Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. If G. Brish goes into....
Iran and/or Syria, he will be making a collossal mistake. He can't field enough army to hold Iraq, and his recruiting efforts are not making minimum quotas. He has spent all his manpower capital.

"You can lose a battle as long as you win the war "(I forgot)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC