Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No more terror alerts - Was it all a lie to keep Bush in power?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:59 PM
Original message
No more terror alerts - Was it all a lie to keep Bush in power?
The Politics of Fear

Almost daily TERROR alerts since 9-11. Now there's nothing. There hasn't been even a hint of a TERROR alert since Bush was safely installed in his second term. He used FEAR and TERROR to stay in power.

Most DUers know what this is all about: The Bush Administration used FEAR and TERROR to wage unprovoked, illegal wars and force the Patriot Acts, Homeland Security and a Wartime (tax cuts for the ruling class, war profiteering) Economy on the American people.

This was all planned out before the Bushies took office. (See: PNAC)

The evidence is available to prove all of this. Given these facts...why do so many Democrats still support the Iraq invasion and occupation? Why do they continue to support Bush by insisting that attacking Iraq was necessary for the security of our nation and wasn't based on lies and deceptions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_State_Elitist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush use fear?
No way, you must be one of those conspiracy people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. The evidence is there for all to see: ideologues and religious fanatics
will forever be blind to the obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But what about those who are not normally blind or fanatical?
This country needs a big dose of the truth...and fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Remember that bogus terror alert in Ohio?
The FBI debunked it and that shows how they used it for political power. It is strange how since Bush "won" re-election there hasn't been anything. Not even before the Boston "threat" that happened not long ago. I remember reading an article that talked about this. I'm sure you can find it in google as "Terror Alerts Political" or something similiar like that. It basically talks about how they were all political when Bush's raitings were down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. There haven't been alerts but
quite a bit of money is being spent on security.
Case in point was the coronation and Super Bowl.
Thought Ridge even said before he left that the color code system wasn't working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes the department of truth wuold like to talk to you about this
though... not good to reveal our play book yuo know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4MoreYearsOfHell Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. No, not a lie!!!
The terra-ists were so dismayed by our resolve to re-elect the chimperor that they all ran away, scurrying back to their holes, only to be smoked out in the future by a nuclear bunker-buster.

So there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes.
There are so many things that anger me about this group, but I probably resent the manipulation of people's fear after 911 more than anything else. They have used the tragedy of that day as a linchpin to further their own political agenda in both the domestic and foreign arenas. Disgusting beyond words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is the Pope a Catholic?
Isn'st it amazing the Imperial Family fells so comfortable with the Whipped Dogs that make up the Imperial Subjects of Amerika that they don't even bother hiding it?

In the past, they would have at least made an effort to cover it up.

Now there is no need for Amerika and Amerikans are not free so there is absolutely nothing to be gained by covering it when we take shit rubbed in our faces with a contemptuous laugh just as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well DUH
And when there really is a threat, they have brush to clear and Grisham novels to read. Terror memos? Puleeze. It's historical.

The problem with Iraq is we are there. What point is there in saying it was all for lies now? It's the elephant in the room. Everyone knows it's all based on lies, but what good does saying it do? We are there. They have to find a way out-and with the Bush cabal in power that would be how? Where are the masses in the streets? It took years of that to make them realize Vietnam was pointless.
And many more deaths.

America really is a stupid country. But it's young. We need to go through what Europeans have gone through for five hundred years, then we'll talk. It takes a few millon dead to learn anything from history. Vietnam was a drop in the bucket, apparently because here we are again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sites like GOPUSA and Talon News
were primary sources for most of the noise that triggered most of the terror alerts.

Right now there is way too much attention being paid to those sites for them to do anything. That is one of the reasons why they are pulling most of their articles.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. Remember this interview with Dr. Dean by Wolf Blitzer on 8/1/04?
CNN's Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer
August 1, 2004

Joining us now from Vermont, the former governor of Vermont, Howard Dean, joining us live. Governor Dean, thanks very much for joining us.

And I want to immediately get your reaction to both of these developing stories. First, the decision by the federal government, the Department of Homeland Security, to increase the threat level here in Washington, D.C., from yellow to orange, from elevated to high. What do you make of this?

HOWARD DEAN, FORMER GOVERNOR OF VERMONT: It's hard to know what to make. None of us outside the administration have access to the intelligence, which led to this determination.

I am concerned that every time something happens that's not good for President Bush he plays this trump card, which is terrorism. His whole campaign is based on the notion that "I can keep you safe, therefore at times of difficulty for America stick with me," and then out comes Tom Ridge.

It's just impossible to know how much of this is real and how much of this is politics, and I suspect there's some of both in it...

BLITZER: Well, when you say that, that's a very serious allegation, that the federal government, Tom Ridge, the president of the United States, may be playing politics with the whole issue of fear and terror threat levels. And I want you to explain specifically, so there's no confusion, what you mean by that.

DEAN: What I mean by that is the president himself has played politics with it. The president is basing his political campaign for re-election on the notion that he ought to be re-elected because terrorism is a danger, and his case to the American people is, "I'm the only person who can get us through this." So of course this is politics.

The question is, do I believe this is being fabricated? No, of course I don't believe that. But I do think that there is politics in this, and the question is, how much is politics and how much is a real threat?

I have no doubt there's a real threat here, but I also -- this is a long history of orange to yellow, yellow to orange, orange to yellow without a lot of explanation.

I find that the warnings -- watch out for somebody walking into buildings, watch out for somebody driving cars, watch out for somebody driving a truck -- that's not very helpful in New York City. It would be very helpful if the federal government would be much more specific about exactly what they'd like to us watch out for as they're raising all these levels.

BLITZER: But isn't it important that if there are serious indicators of a threat out there, that the federal government at least notify those who may be in harm's way to be a little bit more vigilant?

DEAN: Yes, it is very important. And one of the things about this warning, which is different than the previous many, many, many that the Bush administration has given us is they've given us specific cities and specific targets.

The usual pattern of the Bush administration is just come out and tell everybody, "We have chatter, we have chatter, watch out, watch out," and that is totally unhelpful. This at least confines it to a geographic area, and I think that's an improvement.

I think, frankly, that this is an area which I think John Kerry would handle much differently. I think John Kerry would probably wait until he knew exactly what the situation was.

He's also said that he would hire more special forces people, and that's going to be the key to stopping this. We need to stop these people in their own lands, not when they get to ours.


http://www.crocuta.net/Dean/Dean_Interview_CNN_LateEdition_Aug1_2004.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Oh, I saw it, I saw it...pick me, pick me
He was the FIRST politician that I heard actually say what MANY of us were thinking...I really respected that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Good job! And he got really slammed for that. But it was the truth.
For you: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 16th 2024, 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC