Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tweety teeing off on Gannon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Nightwing Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:24 PM
Original message
Tweety teeing off on Gannon
On Hardball, Buchanan is defending Guckert which is appalling to say the least. Just went to break but more coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indianablue Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. The way Pat was defending this guy one would think he is ...
Gannon client...my god.....he all but took a bullet for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nightwing Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Amen to that!!
Buchanan is way out of line in defending this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. What's buchanan's game?
Why is he defending the indefensible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. He's a typical republicrite. Very predictable behavior on his part.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. imho, he gets a gig on Tweety's show to defend a particular position
That's when the whore in Buchanan comes out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did they also have a critic of "Jeff Gannon" on the show? nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Tweety's words to Buchanan: "You are defending the undefendable" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. so Chris Matthews himself acted as a critic, but no one else? nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Look, the one thing this administration can't have is a gay sex scandle
They want no "sex" scandles of any kind with all they did in the Clinton affair. But, you would have Falwell, Robertson, et. al literally turning an uncovered hetrosexual affair into an act ordered by God. BUT the one thing they cannot have that would totally rip the Christian right away from the GOP screaming is to have a homosexual sex scandle. You can bet all the guns have been told to go out and pull the trigger and shut this up NOW!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Bingo
You hit the nail on the head :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wonder what ol' Pat would be saying if it had been Clinton. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. This story must be BIG & DANGEROUS....Buchanan should know...he's
been around. If he's defending Gan/Gurk and Drudge still doesn't have it up on his site and Howie and Wolfie are still digging in...we know we've got a "winner." If we can keep on it...

There's so much missing yet from Gan/Gurk's past. That's where the threads lead...my 2 cents observation, anyway.

Buchanan is sweating bullets that he will see his Repugs take another Nixon hit. And as much as Pat doesn't like the Neo-Cons he's a Repug,through and through. And he has "buddies" that he needs to protect.

Amazing isn't it? These "Chicken Hawks" turn tale and run from their own so-called moral principles but will tear your guts out if you are a Democrat...sheesh..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Springg Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. This Story Should be Huge...but will it?
This story should be huge....it qualifies as news on so many levels...but corporate media is back-pedaling as fast as it can to stay away from it!!! There is the issue of national security...media control, the decline of real investigative reporting by so called legitimate journalists, White House personnel being bribed by Gannon/Guckert?... and, last but not least, the issue of how this sleazeoid had access to classified information regarding Valerie PlaMe? Remember how many weeks CNNN, Fox and MSNBC spent dissecting every vowel uttered by the swift boat liars? And now virtual silence?
I just urge each and every one here to email this story to everyone on our mailing lists...keep it front and center....write letters to the editors of largest newspapers...cable, ABC, CBS, NBC, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC