Is Drudge "involved" with Gannon in any way?

[zulchzulu]

Poll question: Is Drudge "involved" with Gannon in any way?

There have been stories brewing on the web about why Drudge, who would be usually seen as the first guy to blow out a story (especially as salicious as the Gannon story), has done barely anything in regards to the story.

Not to link his site (which I never will), but his archives show scant stories on the subject...one on McClellan being the usual ass that he is and another with the ever-flashy headline " WHITE HOUSE SPOKESMAN: WHAT IS A REPORTER?" and a paragraph with the ever-never-done "Developing...".

Drudge is a self-hating gay mouthpiece for the GOP MSM Echo Chamber and Gannon (also gay) is certainly well-trained in the art of Drudgery.

So the question begs that something must be up with these two. Are they "involved"?

[edbermac]

1. It depends on how you define "involved"...

:evilgrin:

[liberal N proud]

2. Drudge just dosn't want to say anything that would look bad

on the president or his MANdate.

[meegbear]

3. I think even Gannon has taste ...

would YOU screw around with drudge?

[sarcasmo]

4. Drudge is just Right Wing Propaganda and doesn't want to help the story.

[Poppyseedman]

5. Drudge knowns what side his bread is buttered on

[ZootSuitGringo]

6. Drudge only smears

Democrats or out-of-favor Republicans.