Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I am absolutely FURIOUS!!! How could Dems vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:43 PM
Original message
I am absolutely FURIOUS!!! How could Dems vote
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 07:44 PM by ailsagirl
for *'s plan to curb class-action lawsuits???

The fact of the matter is, we have a bunch of effing phonies sitting in Congress who are Dems in name only. Had they stuck together and voted NO on this outrageous legislation, it would have lost.

Those people (those who voted for it, I mean) don't represent us-- they're effing Repugs!!!!

It's easy enough to find out who voted YES...

I hope those of you who have reps who went along with this draconian legislation give them bloody hell.

GRRRRRRRRRRR

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. 18 of them did. They are who we need to vote out NOW!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Hmmm... eighteen isn't as many as I thought... but still!!
That's one way to separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak-- find out who voted for it and why.

But, really, unless our people in Congress and the Senate stick together and vote these outrageous proposals down, we don't stand a chance.

I'm praying they're a tiny minority...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. Oh-- I thought you meant 18 members of Congress
You mean some FIFTY Dems in Congress voted yes????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-20-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
72. Where are Hollings and Edwards when we needed them?
The JUSTICE block, they would have had a chance of mustering a block, but hard when votes like Cantwell's were probably motivated by pressure from hi-tech who fear class actions more than anything else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who are they , do you have a list handy?
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I don't know yet-- but I will find out and post it in this thread
...when I do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Yup.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00009



Note these folks:

Bayh, Feinstein, Cantwell, Dodd, Landrieu, Lieberman, Rockefeller, Schumer and a few others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. DiFi will NEVER get my vote again -- this is last straw
Between her support of Condoskeezza and now this, she's over in my book. And Joementum ought to just change his "D" to an "R" -- spineless DINO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
58. I know-- pretty damned infuriating
I emailed Feinstein about the Rice thing and got one of those form emails, "...sorry you are disappointed..." crap

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Cantwell. Sigh.
It figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. The 2006 Dem primary will frown upon her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
63. Only if someone runs against her
Is there anyone who is challenging her? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Cantwell is up for election
WA has got to find someone better than this bitch.

She has been completely unresponsive to the people who voted for her.

She is a DINO.

Out damned bitch -- OUT of office. Go back to work for the crap company REAL PLAYER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Yeah, but if she makes it through the primary, it will be vs. ROSSI
I can't do anything to risk his getting a Senate seat. I don't care if it turns out she was dating Jeff Gannon. Rossi is really really terrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spirochete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
56. I'll vote against her
in the primaries next year. She's been every bit as useless as Feinstein, et al. The only good thing she ever did was rid us of Slade Gorton, and she just barely did that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. Landrieu?
Sigh. Disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeeinlouisiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
55. She's always disappointing.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. Christ! Forgot
Obama- YEA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. What a disappointment Obama is! He's only trying to advance himself!
He doesn't give a rat's butt about us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. You never know.
It's not a good start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Here's a list of the roll call votes in the House and Senate
For the House

and

the Senate

I'm not sure where one would find a list that just had the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. Lets see..Obama,Fienstien,of course LIEberman all voted YEA...
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 08:40 PM by OneTwentyoNine
Not one fucking Republican had the guts to stand up to corporate America. Hope someone REAL close to them gets FUCKED OVER by this legislation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
51. So according to the list
Clinton and Kerry voted no right? *prays*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
64. Democrats with a spine who voted against it
Nays
Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Biden (D-DE)
Boxer (D-CA)
Byrd (D-WV)
Clinton (D-NY)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reid (D-NV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wyden (D-OR)

Not Voting
Santorum (R-PA)
Sununu (R-NH)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. now you know the reason we lost
most of the so-called democrats representing have no principle

hopefully howard will clean this up, but it is more important for us to vote them out. It does not matter if we lose short term, it is long term that counts, and we must vote the bastards out who do not represent democratic interests
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. ABSOLUTELY-- DRUM THEM OUT!!!
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 08:30 PM by ailsagirl
It's outrageous. I'm going to find out who voted for it and send some emails.

Or, better yet, call their offices.

I'd love it if hundreds of furious calls poured into these bastards' offices...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Well, the 18 Senators and 50 House members who voted for this..
actually did win. If they didn't, they wouldn't be voting on the damn thing.

My guy in the Kansas 3rd district, Dennis Moore, voted for this trainwreck. I'm somewhat disappointed in him for this and other votes, but I recognize that the alternative is far worse. By swaying to the right on some issues, he's able to keep his seat in a very red state in our hands. If he sided with Rep. Kucinich on every issue, he'd get booted and KS-3 would be held by a far right theocrat knuckledragger.

I'm not saying I want our national party leadership to pander to the ex-urbs of Kansas City, because that would really piss me off too. I just firmly believe that we need to allow for regionally diversity within the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
59. Where can I find out which members of Congress voted yes??
Does anyone know?

They're pretty reprehensible as well.

Cowards. Hypocrites
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. Here
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 11:36 PM by cestpaspossible
Baird, Bean, Berry, Boren, Boucher, Boyd, Case, Chandler, Cooper, Costa, Costello, Cramer, Cuellar, Davis (AL), Davis (IL), Davis (TN), Edwards, Emanuel, Ford, Gonzalez, Gordon, Harman, Higgins, Hinojosa, Holden, Kanjorski, Kind, Larsen (WA), Larson (CT), Lipinski, Marshall, Matheson, Meeks (NY), Melancon, Michaud, Moore (KS), Moran (VA), Murtha, Peterson (MN), Pomeroy, Rahall, Reyes, Ruppersberger, Scott (GA), Smith (WA), Snyder, Tanner, Tauscher, Taylor (MS), Wu

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll038.xml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #60
67. Thank you, cestpaspossible
It's important to know whom to trust...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrustingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. there is no long term. :(
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 08:28 PM by TrustingDog
not anymore. everything changed since 911.

edit: actually since 2000, which bred 911.
This is Not the normal game at all so save yourselves some grief by realising this - you are under siege, the internal type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. For the next two years at least they're all we've got.
So, I will support them for now. It does seem like they've been standing up for us more lately, but I can't figure out why they supported that bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Me either. And I thought things were looking more hopeful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
independentchristian Donating Member (393 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. I can't even think about that bill passing, it makes me so angry...nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Lets get together
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 07:58 PM by Ivote
We can start by supporting companies that contribute to Democratic causes.
Put our money where it will benefit us the most
http://buyblue.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. thanks for reminding me.....I meant to bring this up yesterday
nobody talked about it then, during the voting

this is really as bad, or WORSE than all the other crap...even the appointments to Negroponte and Chertoff, cause it affects millions of people, maybe all of us, indirectly, by going after the last recourse we have against the corpirates

you KNOW there's no more regulatory oversight anymore, so all we have left is the courts

putting these suits into the federal courts makes accessibilty/judgment much more slanted towards the rich fux

also, check this
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=3133491
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'd do it, but my Rep. is a Nazi lunatic (Dana Rohrbacher)
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 07:57 PM by Merrick
which is odd considering I live in Long Beach, Ca. (some curious bit of gerrymandering lumps my neighborhood in with some of the most fascist areas of Orange COunty). Any letter or petition I send that guy merely elicits a form letter kindly explaining why drilling for oil in Alaska's Wildlife Preserve is a good thing, why regulations on corporate media ownership is bad, etc. damn rich white people and their precious stocks and bullshit.

edit: oh yeah, this was the senate's vote today. I see Feinstein voted yes and boxer no. not surprised. I'll send a quick email to that old hag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. I Was Having A Pity Party This Morning
Feeling sad and blue for myself....then I read your post....Dana is your rep.....Oy....so sorry....that is a shite situation....that is one fuckin sorry ass dumb shit. Feelin blue for ya in the great blue state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. Lots of good Dems work for companies sued by bogus plaintiffs' lawyers
Get real guys. People can still bring individual suits and securities class actions. It's just the state court plaintiffs bar that now loses their big fees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. So...
if you were crippled, poisoned etc. at a young age due to some gross negligence on the part of an HMO or other corporation and couldn't work for the rest of your life you'd be content with what would amount to $10 a day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. This bill
has no effect on an individual suit at all -- just class actions, so your example isn't valid.

A valid example would be the Vioxx claims -- or a future claim similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. Yeah,and it has to file as a Federal suit instead of a State suit....
My guess unless its a horrendous suit a Federal judge will tell everyone to get lost and quit wasting valuable Federal time.

Not all class action suits are the "big news" stuff like drug companies and exploding Pinto's. Many can be as simple as getting screwed over on a $2,000.00 computer that never worked as advertised. It could be a defective riding mower or many other things. None possibly caused you bodily harm,just caused harm to your check book.

Think a Federal Judge will let those "frivilous" suits come to fuition?? My guess is most likely HELL NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
61. You don't know what you're talking about. First, the new class action law
has little if any effect on lawyers. It has affect on companies who have committed systemic wrongs that rip-off people in an amount that is too small to be sufficiently remedied one suit at a time. Second, if you think "good companies" are being victimized by "bogus plaintiffs' lawyers," Karl Rove can sleep well tonight knowing he's done a good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. What's Obama's excuse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. For this native of The Land of Lincoln and Obama supporter,
the junior senator from Illinois is fast becoming a major disappointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Yep,he's turning out to be a real piece of work.....
I'll be watching him closer than ever from this point on....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
41. Barack Obama discussed his vote on "The Al Franken" radio show
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 09:05 PM by Eric J in MN
From my blog at:
http://MOVELEFT.COM

Feb. 14, 2005

Bararck Obama's Yes Vote

Barack Obama (D-Illinois), a new US Senator, was interviewed by phone on "The Al Franken Show" radio broadcast today.

Radio co-host Katherine Lanpher asked Obama about his vote in favor of this bill.

Obama replied that he supported it because he doesn't want plaintiffs going to whatever state has the most sympathetic state judges.

(My response: Instead, injured people are now likely to face unsympathetic Bush-appointed federal judges.)

Obama also said that he doesn't want people suing the the Starbucks restaurant chain over lukewarm coffee and getting coupons.

(My response: The bill restricts attorney fees when the plaintiffs are awarded in coupons.
Whether or not the coupons aspect of the bill has merit, it certainly doesn't justify voting for the bill as a whole.

I assume the reference to Starbucks was hypothetical. If there was an actual lawsuit against Starbucks, please post in the comments about it.
)

Al Franken and Katherine Lanpher didn't say whether they agree or disagree with Obama's vote during the interview.

Near the end of the interview, Al Franken implied that Barack Obama should be the Democratic nominee for president in 2008. Al Franken said, "Obama/Sptizer 2008" (referring to Eliot Spitzer.)

I don't want Barack Obama to be the Democratic Party's presidential nominee.

A person's position on "tort reform" says a lot about whether he's on the side of corporations or the people.

For 2008, I'd prefer John Edwards, who is on the side of the people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. Wow, incredibly lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
28. I couldn't agree more -- in fact, I was thinking to myself this afternoon
that Bush has been so incredibly destructive to everything we hold dear that it is totally unconscionable for ANY Dem to vote aye for ANYthing he proposes. It is a betrayal of everything, absolutely everything. I think many of them are in denial, and not quite getting it. Hell, many of us are in denial either a lot of a little, frequently or occasionally.

But the raw truth of the matter is BUSH IS DESTROYING THIS COUNTRY ON EVERY LEVEL, and too many Dems are going blithely along with it. This has to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #28
47. You have stated my views so completely and thoroughly:
Bush is so incredibly destructive! I remember, before the election, thinking of what might happen if he got back in, and being completely overcome with horror and loss! And now, I'm having to live with those feelings EVERY DAY until 2008. I'm not just living with those feelings, but with the actual degradation of our way of life. Too horrible for words, but we keep trying to say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
31. Here's the list, folks-- the TRAITORS in our party
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 08:49 PM by ailsagirl
These so-called Dem senators voted FOR *'s legislation on class-action lawsuits.

Thanks, guys!!!!!!!!

:mad: :puke: :spank:

Bayh (D-IN)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dodd (D-CT)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Nelson (D-NE)
Obama (D-IL)
Reed (D-RI)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Schumer (D-NY)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. I'm surprised Schumer's on that list
What the hell was he thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. Charles Schumer has mostly been better than I expected, but
not this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #43
54. I'm very disappointed in him
I am, however, very pleased with Steve Israel and proud to call him my congressman. I sent him thanks. I'm going to send a different message to Schumer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. Good for you... I'm going to send Feinstein an email
I'm ashamed to have her as senator-- in fact, 99% of the time, I forget she even exists (because Boxer is so awesome!!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. Let's NOT nominate any of the above for president in 2008 or another year
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 09:09 PM by Eric J in MN
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNAZ Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. 5 of those guys have white house hopes and they
know this vote plays well in the red states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #46
65. Exactly...
.... and that is why we need to get a message to them.

"With the election of Howard Dean to the DNC chairmanship, we finally have made a real start on the hard work of rebuilding our party.

The grass roots Democrats who made this happen are going to make some other things happen as well. We are going to demand that support be withdrawn from Congresspersons who continue to vote for the Bush agenda.

If you think that voting for something that hurts America and Americans is going to improve your chances of winning the White House some day, or even remaining in Congress, think again. If you are going to vote Republican, we don't need you. And we are not going to support you or your campaign."

Oh well, I can dream can't I? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #31
52. Thank you for the list
I'm glad Boxer, Clinton and Kerry didn't vote for this. So far Kerry hasn't been a disappointment. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
53. Ugh - Salazar....Huge Huge Disappointment Right Off The Bat
Can't believe I stood out on street corners waving signs, calling voters - why did I do this for a guy I knew would vote republican all the way?

I was a Miles delegate - thought Salazar would be better than beer baron...not much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v3.0
==================



This week is our first quarter 2005 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend almost entirely
on donations from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for
your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Grouped By Vote Position
Grouped By Vote Position

YEAs ---72

Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Allen (R-VA)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burns (R-MT)
Burr (R-NC)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Chafee (R-RI)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Coleman (R-MN)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dole (R-NC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Frist (R-TN)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kohl (D-WI)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lott (R-MS)

Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nelson (D-NE)
Obama (D-IL)
Reed (D-RI)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Schumer (D-NY)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stevens (R-AK)
Talent (R-MO)
Thomas (R-WY)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)



NAYs ---26

Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Biden (D-DE)
Boxer (D-CA)
Byrd (D-WV)
Clinton (D-NY)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)

Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reid (D-NV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wyden (D-OR)



Not Voting - 2

Santorum (R-PA)
Sununu (R-NH)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #38
66. This is juvenile, but seriously....
Does Idaho actually have a Sen. Crapo?

Thank Allah for truth in advertising. :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
39. Advice to democratic lawmakers:
Read DU before you vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
40. How do you eat a donkey? - one bite at a time
It is so stunningly simple, yet it works every time.

In order to destroy plaintiffs rights, start with something simple, "non-threatening", easy to vote for.

You know, say things like "this has no effect on REAL people with REAL problems - we're just trying to get rid of frivolous lawsuits."

This will get many spineless Dems on board, fearing of course they will be painted by the Limbaugh brush if they don't play nice.

But don't worry, I say, this has nothing in common with a similar tactic currently being used with great effectiveness in the halls of Congress as we speak.

"Partial birth" abortion, I believe it's called. This, as you know, has NOTHING to do with eliminating a woman's right to choose - "we're just trying to get rid of a very bad and dangerous practice."

Get it, moderates?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. All my DC reps & senators are GOP
They could care less what I think.

However, I am contacting DNC and letting them know I will not donate to the party if the Democrats in power go along with Bush's radical proposals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2diagnosis Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
49. I hope this isn't
the way they plan on beating the * agenda- not only did it sail through, there was no effort to argue or fight this in the media or at the grassroots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
62. I contacted the DNC tonight
and told them if they couldn't hold the party together against Bush's radical policies, that I would no longer contribute to them. I have already given to the DNC for electing Dr. Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #62
68. Good for you, Erika... I think I'll do likewise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
69. Obama's been a hell of a disappointment
So far, I'm not impressed. Looks like the corporate crowd got to him quick. Didn't he have a real liberal record in the Illinois legislature?

I love my senators though. Both voted against it (Levin and Stabenaw).

I'm also pleasantly surprised by Hillary. Reid's been doing better than Daschle as well - nice to see him vote against this crap legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DARE to HOPE Donating Member (552 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. YES, he has!
I wrote our new senator a note--reminded him how Senator (Please everybody in both parties and hang with the big guys) Dixon was BOOTED out of office, and Carol Moseley Braun put in his place, when prevailing wisdom was that Dixon was "immovable." I also referred to my other big campaign, electing Paul Simon to the Senate in a four way primary, and against Repub money in the Reagan years.

I warned him that if he loses his Democratic base, he will find a ferocious battle on his hands.

Jesse Jr voted with the good guys anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMeKate Donating Member (741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
71. what the hell was barack obama thinking?
damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC