Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alan Greenspan and Batman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 02:19 PM
Original message
Alan Greenspan and Batman

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/GB19Dj01.html


-snip-

FX Trading
Federal Reserve Board head Alan Greenspan referred to the behavior of long-term yields as a “conundrum". A conundrum is defined as a hard or puzzling question, which is the way I am sure Mr G meant it, or did he? A second definition for conundrum is "a riddle, especially one with a pun in its answer". You know what this means, it's time to call Batman - the Riddler is on the loose.

Playing the role of Batman Friday is Greg Weldon, editor of Weldon’s Money Monitor. After feeding all of Mr Greenspan’s riddles through the
Bat-Disgronophocator, our masked hero came up with this:

"New secular highs in liquidity, and, the explosive liquidity under the direction of hedge funds, and their preferred investment vehicle, equities. Gee, might these facts have something to do with the violence of the divergent macro-market trends?

-snip-

Maybe there was much to glean from Mr Greenspan's testimony after all. Maybe the crowd that implies the Fed won't be aggressive, despite it's signaling of more hikes ahead are on to something. Maybe it's why Mr Greenspan suggested that real rates (nominal minus inflation) are tightening because inflation was subdued - a subtle little signal indeed that the Fed may be closer to the end of tightening than many believe.

Or maybe our Bat-hero has it all wrong. Maybe Mr Greenspan has decided that he doesn't want to be remembered as the Fed Bubble-Ologist, after an otherwise long and distinguished career. If so, it means the budding consensus is underestimating his resolve - we have seen that before.
-snip-
-----------------------------

the last paragraph said this riddle would take superheros to solve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. More'n likely...
he just doesn't want to get involved in just how screwed up things really are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC