An eloquent post from Whiskey Bar circa July 2003
http://billmon.org/archives/000403.htmlMr. Dean's Army
<excerpt> (Read the whole thing, a lot of good stuff about demographics and money in politics. Hard stuff)
Braveheart
<snip>
In a way, it reminds me of the plot of the movie Braveheart. (I know that sounds bizarre, given Mel Gibson’s politics, but hear me out.)
The hero, William Wallace, built an army out of nothing and figured out how to use it to beat the English. But Wallace was too angry and too uncompromising. In the end, he was seen as a threat, both by the Scottish lords who originally supported him, and by the Scots king, Robert the Bruce. In the end, Wallace was betrayed and executed.
But the Bruce – a far more devious and unscrupulous leader – went on to beat the English at the battle of Bannockburn, won Scotland’s independence, and used all of his diplomatic wiles to build a network of alliances to safeguard it.
I suspect that at some point – maybe in this election; maybe the next – a Democratic presidential candidate who is not Howard Dean is going to have to turn to Dean’s supporters and say, as Robert the Bruce says to Wallace’s supporters in the final scene of Braveheart: "You bled for him, now will you bleed for me?"
<snip>
Posted by billmon at July 27, 2003 01:12 AM | TrackBack
PS, I'm still with "Braveheart" but if he falls by hostile fire or press treachery, as may happen, I'm with ANY of Kerry, Clark, or Edwards. - fabius
PS, I don't think Dean is too angry. He's sure as hell not as angry as I am. YEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!