Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC Poll - G.W. Bush's Private Conversations: Historical Value Or Gossip

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 10:22 AM
Original message
MSNBC Poll - G.W. Bush's Private Conversations: Historical Value Or Gossip
Only 26 votes in so far...Go man go!

Yes: 73%
No: 27%

My 2 cents:

These are George W. Bush's own words, and with them he reveals his anxiety over character issues that did come up during his runs for president. And what makes these tapes all the more important is that they show the premeditated deceit that lay behind his many evasions and denials. For once we see Bush as he really is, and that makes the historical importance here immense.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3080261

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I voted "gossip". Why?
Because they want us to think this is news. It's nothing but chaff thrown out to confuse the radar.
If we don't give it a big collective ho-hum while simultaneously making noise about Guckert the media will latch onto this tape thing and Guckert will disappear in the clutter.
The tapes are innocuous and will lead nowhere.
The GOP is worried about Guckert, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Historical. It may help bring down this phony, phony man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rniel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. This was purposely dropped out there by Karl Rove
To silence the other crap going on "gannon etc."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm Not Sure Why These Should Be Considered Mutually Exclusive
I think both these tapes and the "Gannon" situation are insights into the murky world of Shrub's psyche. Rather than canceling each other out, shouldn't we be viewing them as a combination of rather unfortunate events for the Little President?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Nice try, Mark. Them tapes surfaced very conveniently and are now
covered INSTEAD of the relevant story.
After all the crimes over the past 5 years, I don't give a damn if W did cocaine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Bosh.
One is an old media story, and one is a blog story. That is the real problem a lot of people here have with the New York Times tapes deal.

The issue is Bush's character, and to say that his deceit over his drug use has nothing to do with his "Gannon" shenanigans is silly. These are 2 manifestations of the same dishonesty that is behind everything Bush does. It is up to us to make the connection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. 2 manifestations of one problem: media manipulation.
gannon is the discovery, the "tapes" are an example of it. That manufactured reality we are supposed to study. Nice try.

''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And
while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll
act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and
that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you,
all of you, will be left to just study what we do.''
Bush aide to Ron Suskind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Sorry. Just Can't Buy Into Your Conspiracy Theory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. conspiracy theory?
Hardly. Media manipulation and lies are reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. To Say That The Wead Tapes...
...were released to the NY Times in order to divert attention from the "Gannon" story is a conspiracy theory I just cannot buy into. Sorry. If you can, then go for it. Love to see some cites, though. And if you can come up with some compelling evidence, then I will be the first to congratulate you.

Nor can I understand how the Wead Tapes somehow help George W. Bush. To me they are a candid and unflattering look into the devious and narrow mind of a self-obsessed disingenuous weasel, someone perfectly capable of planting a disreputable individual such as Jeff "Gannon" in the White House press room.

These stories belong together, side by side, so all the world can see the pattern of manipulation and dishonesty that is part and parcel of the Bush Regime.

Media manipulation and lies ARE a reality. But so are overreaction, baseless fear, and paranoia. And in the end the latter will only serve to discredit our attempts to expose the former.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. If they had been meant to do harm to GW Bush....
they would have been released before the election. They are innocuous, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CindyDale Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's all gossip
When are they going to start making a racket about who is profiting from this war and what we can do about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. I like to think of all this stuff as 'evidence' for his upcoming trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. Not even gossip. Propaganda - fabricated BS. Gossip should be revealing.
Edited on Mon Feb-21-05 11:29 AM by robbedvoter
I voted "gossip" and made the comment in the section for it.
I am so tired of bait and switch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. Neither. It's shrubco's neverending game of deflection. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. Here's my response to their "poll"
I voted for "just gossip", only because you did not have more choices. How convenient for this to come out right now, while the Gannon/Guckert connection to Valerie Plame, Rathergate, and the White House in general, is being largely ignored by the media.

If it was meant to be either of "historical value" or "just gossip", it would have been out there three months ago.

As usual with this administration...it's all about deflection. And you, as the media assist in that deflection with every opportunity you get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. How about PR Stunt??
That's more accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. These tapes are a Rove maneuver -
meant to deflect attention away from the Guckert/Gannon story. I know they date them in 1998, but I wouldn't be surprised if * recorded them last week. I don't believe ANYTHING anymore.
It's all bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tomee450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Exactly
Edited on Mon Feb-21-05 01:27 PM by Tomee450
I haven't gotten excited about Gannongate because I feel it's going nowhere, just like the other scandals. The Republican Party has the MSM in the palm of its hand. The MSM is not going to do anything to hurt Bush. The media welcome these tapes;now the have an excuse to ignore the Gannon scandal. They know these tapes aren't going to hurt Bush in the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. this poll is part of the farce
this massive non-story is just a giant farce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpringsCoral Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. 62%gossip
Total gossip that will be spun to his advantage!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC