Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

General Accountability Office's David Walker ...Gannongate investigation ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:11 PM
Original message
General Accountability Office's David Walker ...Gannongate investigation ?
In light of past abuses of government sponsored 'journalism', you would think that the GAO would be interested in Gannon/Guckert abuses also.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/19/politics/19gao.html?ex=1109480400&en=9686cc137fcaf872&ei=5070

""In fact, it has become increasingly common for federal agencies to adopt the public relations tactic of producing "video news releases" that look indistinguishable from authentic newscasts and, as ready-made and cost-free reports, are sometimes picked up by local news programs. It is illegal for the government to produce or distribute such publicity material domestically without disclosing its own role....

The two best-known cases of such video news releases - one concerning the new Medicare law, the other an antidrug campaign by the Bush administration - drew sharp rebukes from the G.A.O. after separate investigations last year found that the agencies involved had violated the law.

Those cases were followed by disclosures that the government had paid at least one conservative commentator, Armstrong Williams, to promote the administration's No Child Left Behind education measure and had put two other conservative writers on the federal payroll to help develop programs. These episodes have prompted calls from Democrats for stricter oversight of the administration's publicity practices, which have cost millions of dollars of federal revenue.""

What Gannon/Guckert was doing is along these same 'faux news' lines and if the President had foreknowledge of Gannon/Guckert, well...you can ask the next question of him even if the media won't.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blue4barb Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. GAO has an investigation on-going on election "irregularities"
thanks to John Conyers. A second one on Gannongate-- and why stop there? I think this admin deserves the trifecta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Good analogy! A RICOH "Trifecta."
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The people deserve all the facts, not just Bush admin propaganda
Also, the military benefits from the truth since all the useless DoD spending can be redirected or eliminated altogether. Enlistments go up when the truth of situations gets told, it seems to me.

"Truth, Justice, and The American Way", when was the last time you heard that and really believed it ? Not since November 22, 1963 for me at least. What the heck has gone wrong since then...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. They could but I think the Dems want to question Gannon in CSPAN...
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC