In light of past abuses of government sponsored 'journalism', you would think that the GAO would be interested in Gannon/Guckert abuses also.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/19/politics/19gao.html?ex=1109480400&en=9686cc137fcaf872&ei=5070""In fact, it has become increasingly common for federal agencies to adopt the public relations tactic of producing "video news releases" that look indistinguishable from authentic newscasts and, as ready-made and cost-free reports, are sometimes picked up by local news programs. It is illegal for the government to produce or distribute such publicity material domestically without disclosing its own role....
The two best-known cases of such video news releases - one concerning the new Medicare law, the other an antidrug campaign by the Bush administration - drew sharp rebukes from the G.A.O. after separate investigations last year found that the agencies involved had violated the law.
Those cases were followed by disclosures that the government had paid at least one conservative commentator, Armstrong Williams, to promote the administration's No Child Left Behind education measure and had put two other conservative writers on the federal payroll to help develop programs. These episodes have prompted calls from Democrats for stricter oversight of the administration's publicity practices, which have cost millions of dollars of federal revenue.""
What Gannon/Guckert was doing is along these same 'faux news' lines and if the President had foreknowledge of Gannon/Guckert, well...you can ask the next question of him even if the media won't.