Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anyone see Clark on CNN this AM?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 10:00 AM
Original message
Did anyone see Clark on CNN this AM?
He was tough on Putin. If this brave man is President...he's really going to be a strong president and the other world leaders will respect him and his decisions and policies. Everyone knows the Chimp doesn't know what the hell he's talking about...world's biggest fool!
When Clark talks...they will put it in his pipe and smoke it! When bush* talks...they spit it on the ground and stamp it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. When asked about Putin in NH
Clark at a townhall meeting reminded everyone that Putin was KGB. He said that Putin still is not withstanding the cross on his neck. My friend thought the statement would get Clark in trouble, but instead it makes him look like a soothsayer.

Pragmatic as Clark is, he understands the difference between working with someone and gushing over them a la bushmonkey.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas_Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Damn, missed it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sjr5740 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. I was a big Clark supporter during the primaries last year
I really liked his message and I am always impressed when he speaks. He is truly plain spoken (unlike the chimp-boys mangling of the english language) and lays things out clearly and honestly without pushing an agenda. I think he is a realist in national defense without blindly chanting "support our troops" over and over because he was there and he knows what it truly means to support troops and it is no inane slogans while cutting benefits and aid.

I also think he is a realist on domestic and personal issues. As JS said "I've heard * speak and his rhetoric doesn't match his record"

I just think WC wasn't ready for prime time in 2004 because he is not a washington insider. I really hope he is retooling for a run in '08

sjr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dread Pirate KR Read Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Clark repeated what he said from the Wolf/Perle appearance on CNN
Edited on Thu Feb-24-05 11:49 AM by Dread Pirate KR Read
Clark challenged Bush to "call on Putin", regarding their support in providing nuclear components to Iran, earlier this week.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmike Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. he's a quick learner
I didn't support Clark during the primaries(I'm a Deaniac). I think he failed because he had a thrown together campaign and wasn't ready for the insanity of the process-kind of like Dean. But the man is sharp as a tack, and learns from his mistakes. If he decides to go for it in 2008- and I bet he will, I'd be surprised if he doesn't have a real machine behind him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZootSuitGringo Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. CNN Transcript now available
SOLEDAD O'BRIEN: General Wesley Clark was NATO's supreme allied
commander from 1997 to 2000. He was also recently a presidential
candidate.

Joining us this morning. Nice to chat with you.

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK, FMR. NATO SUPREME ALLIED COMMANDER: Good to be
with you.

O'BRIEN: We just heard John king laying out the areas in common,, the
signing agreements involving the nuclear security, anti- terror
security. Let's talk, though, about areas in contention, mostly
involving Russia's move away from democracy. Just how tough do you
think President Bush needs to be today in his meetings with President
Putin.

CLARK: Well, I think we won't know that. Privately, he needs to be
very firm, and he needs to be very candid with Putin. He said he has a relationship with Putin. And this is the time to use that
relationship, whatever relationship it is, to lay out and make it very clear.

What President Bush said in the inaugural is, America's interests are
our values. So it's good to have the agreements on nuclear security
and so forth. Those are important. Those are America's interests, but
our values are things like democracy, and in that area, he has to
exert pressure.

O'BRIEN: You mentioned the private versus the public. To some degree,
though, doesn't he have to come out publicly and say something that
underscores how the private discussions -- he cannot just say, can he, oh, yes, in private I definitely hammered him?

CLARK: No, because it wouldn't be private. But you're going to get a
different tone privately than publicly I suspect. I think you're going to see some hint of the pressure and the tension, but we've had the resolution in Congress by Senator McCain and others calling for Russia be thrown out of the G-8 on their economic basis, because they're not pursuing a path to democracy. That's the kind of public pressure. The president can use that and work more privately.

O'BRIEN: You talk about this relationship that the presidents,
President Bush and President Putin have. President Bush had said that
he gained a sense of President's Putin's soul when he looked into his
eyes, and found him to be straightforward and trustworthy. To what
degree can those words come back to he regret having said that when he is now in a position of contention, frankly, with the Russian president.

CLARK: I think it's always dangerous for a president to make too much out of personal relationships like this, and especially with overly flowery language, because ultimately, leaders have to represent their own interests and their own values. And those interests don't always coincide, especially the interests between the United States and Russia. So it's up to President Bush to lead America. He's got to use every tool in his arsenal, and he's got to help protect our interests and our values.

O'BRIEN: But if our interests -- our being the United States'
interests -- involve keeping Iran from having a nuclear program, and
you have President Putin saying very clearly that we're going to
continue our cooperation with Iran on that front, that completely
contradicts what President Bush has said.

CLARK: That's exactly right.

O'BRIEN: Does this lead us down the road to reigniting the Cold War?

CLARK: I don't know if it takes you that far, but you're certainly
going to see sparks in this relationship. And if we don't see those,
then the United States is not acting properly. We simply cannot allow
Russia to move forward on its own interests, taking advantage of the
United States, the president's supposed relationship, and then move
wee from the things we feel are important. We don't feel that Russia
should be helping Iran gain nuclear capabilities, and we don't feel
that they should be moving away from democracy, from freedom of the
press, from the election of governors and the other measures that
Putin has recently instituted that pull Russia in the wrong direction.

O'BRIEN: NATO Supreme Allied Commander General Wesley Clark, nice to
see you, as always.

CLARK: Thank you, Soledad.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0502/24/ltm.01.h...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And he was totally right about the emphasis on their "relationship"
Sure enough, the Chimp came out with flowery, flattering language about how trustworthy Putin is. Naturally, Putin's going to say "Iran shouldn't have a nuclear weapon," but the Chimp has gotten nowhere in getting him not to help them with a reactor. (I always get the feeling Putin is laughing at how easy these idiots are.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC