If you thought US Job Statistics were "cooked" --- the answer is here.

[cthrumatrix]

Subtracting Out the Rhetoric

Statistics and fractions are funny things and easily manipulated. For example, when talking about issues such as the unemployment rate, small percentages score political points. So the Bush administration continues to harp on just how low the unemployment rate has fallen, taking advantage of the Bureau of Labor Statistics various measures of underutilization that allows the “hiding” of millions of unemployed.

While President Bush continues to praise the “low” unemployment rate, he neglects the soaring number of “discouraged workers” leaving the labor force. In fact, a recent report by the Labor Department found that “the share of the working-age population working or actively seeking a job…fell to 65.8 percent in January, the lowest reading in 17 years.”


http://thinkprogress.org/

[prodigal_green]

1. I've never understood "discouraged"

does this simply mean folks whose unemployment insurance has run out? That can happen after 13, 26 or 39 weeks depending upon what congress approves. Plenty of people are still looking for work even though their benefits have run out. And, they are in more desperate straights because of it.

[AllegroRondo]

3. Definition of Discouraged

It just means that you are not actively looking for work.

The Unemployment numbers are determined by a phone survey. They ask
1) Are you currently working? If yes, you are employed, survey ends.
2) Did you look for work in the last week? If yes, you are unemployed - this is what the UE number is based on.
If you did not actively look for work in the last week, you are 'discouraged', and not part of the numbers.

on edit:
for the purpose of the weekly unemployment numbers, it doesnt matter if you are getting UE payments or not. If you did not work last week, but looked for work, you are officially 'unemployed', even if your benefits have run out.

[cthrumatrix]

4. it means those workers "Do not Count" anymore...hence a smaller number

there 6 levels of unemployment...the one that takes into account the TOTAL unemployed is much much HIGHER

[Demit]

6. Bush figures if you're not employed, and not collecting compo, you

now count as self-employed--one a them there "entrepreneurs", you know, like the folks who make a killing selling on eBay. If you're in dire straits, why, go back to junior college and get yourself a 21st century trade, gosh darnit! (sarcasm off)

[skids]

7. It's done though a telephone survey.

They ask people whether they have applied for a job in the recent past. If they say yes, they are unemployed. If they say no, they are discouraged. However, it isn't the "discouraged" workers that make up the worst of it. They are only a fraction of a percent. It is "marginally attached" and other categories. More here:


http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm

[cthrumatrix]

8. read this link ...it explains the "intentional misleading" statistic

http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2004/06/14/us_jobless_rate_misses_hidden_unemployed/

[Vinnie From Indy]

2. They have beem misprepresenting the labor numbers for years.

Falling unemployment claims only means people have been dropped from the rolls. After that, they become non-entities and are not counted. I also think the household survey is a bit suspect as well. The payroll numbers really tell the story in my mind.

[TahitiNut]

5. It's as obvious as can be. 10 million jobs below full employment.

[cthrumatrix]

10. and more here...... 17 year low in jobs and people looking

Working-age people with jobs on decline

By Jeannine Aversa, AP Economics Writer | February 24, 2005

WASHINGTON -- The share of the working-age population working or actively seeking a job -- known as the participation rate -- fell to 65.8 percent in January, the lowest reading in 17 years, according to numbers collected by the Labor Department.

snip

Economists offer a variety of factors behind the decline: a loss of factory jobs, where some are unqualified to snag other jobs; people getting out of the 9-to-5 grind to go back to school; people deciding to be a stay-at-home mom or dad; and people abandoning job searches because they can't find a job at a pay level they want.

The participation rate hit an all-time high of 67.3 percent in early 2000 -- when the economy was still roaring and employers had a hardy appetite to hire workers. After that, the rate slowly drifted downward as the economy suffered through the 2001 recession and then struggled to recover.

snip

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2... /

[Career Prole]

9. And what becomes of the "discouraged workers"?

I felt since the number of discouraged workers has grown drastically, that growth would be evidenced elsewhere and indeed it has.

Specifically, we found that the number of people requesting emergency food and shelter is increasing in every state surveyed, and in a wide range of urban areas, rural areas, and small to mid-sized towns. However, funding for these programs is inadequate and on the decline, most frequently so from government sources. Many agencies are cutting programs and turning away requests for help due to a lack of resources.

The main findings are as follows:

The number of people requesting emergency food at agencies is increasing.
• 74% of agencies surveyed reported an increase in requests for food assistance over the past year; on average, surveyed agencies reported a 28% increase in requests.

The number of people requesting emergency shelter at agencies is increasing.
• 65% of agencies surveyed reported an increase in requests for shelter over the past year; on average, surveyed agencies reported a 27% increase in requests.

Agencies reported that more people are experiencing hunger and homelessness in their communities than assistance is available.
• 24% of emergency food providers surveyed reported that they turned away requests for food this past year, primarily due to a lack of resources.
• 77% of emergency shelter providers surveyed reported that they turned away requests for shelter this past year, primarily due to a lack of resources.

Many agencies reported funding cuts over the past year; cuts from government sources were most frequent.
• 33% of agencies reported reduced income over the past year; 43% of agencies saw funding cuts from the state government and 35% from the federal government.

A significant percent of agencies that turned away requests for assistance reported a decrease in overall income in the past year.
• 39% of emergency food providers and 43% of emergency shelter providers that reported turning away requests for assistance also reported reduced income this past year.

http://www.studentsagainsthunger.org/hunger.asp?id2=15761

Hey George...you say you want a revolution?
:grr:

[cthrumatrix]

11. and he wants to CUT soc sec benefits --- this is a Disaster

[Career Prole]

12. It'll take years to recover

from this moron and his "good ol' boy" friends, if not generations.
And because of the way they cover their tracks with employment as you've pointed out, and reporting inflation numbers with food and fuel dropped out, etc. much of America will be left wondering what went so wrong.

"I looked into his soul and saw...nothing."

[Tandalayo_Scheisskopf]

13. Incredible.

Slapped it on the homepage of the site in my .sig.

[Career Prole]

15. Excellent...I just had a look.

Great site you have there, too! :thumbsup:

[Tandalayo_Scheisskopf]

16. Thank you.

Trying to get them to invest in a new theme from this worthy:

http://www.7dana.com

Goran is the Big Swinging Richard of Xoops theming. He r4wKz.

[TahitiNut]

17. Other 'discouraged workers' are forced into early retirement ...

... and start collecting Social Security earlier than their 'full benefit age.' This, of course, has a prolonged impact on their standard of living since the benefits can be as much as 30% lower than if they'd wait 4-5 more years. It also has a negative impact on Social Security itself, taking someone who'd otherwise be paying payroll taxes and causing them to collect benefits instead.

[Career Prole]

18. Quite true. I imagine there are plenty of this group as well since

age discrimination was so ineffectively legislated against.
I know if I lose my job at my age I may as well hang it up.

[Lydia Leftcoast]

20. Right, I know three people who started collecting at aged 62

simply because they were long-term unemployed after long professional careers and had used up all their savings, and, in one case, cashed in a 401(k), due to inability to get more than non-living wage jobs.

[tgnyc]

14. some more graphics on this at

www.intelligencesquad.com/id106.html

[CoffeeCat]

19. Can someone clarify for me...

I always thought that an "unemployed" person, was someone who: 1.) Is without a job; 2.) is actively seeking work; 3.) and must have filed an unemployment claim with the state.

I thought the official claim, triggered the identification of an "unemployed person." Then, those filing claims were divided by the total US population--which = the official, national unemployment percentage.

Do I totally have this wrong?

I remember learning that those NOT actively seeking work--or those whose unemployment benefits had run out--were not part of the official "unemployment statistic." However, people who are between jobs for the short term (frictional unemployment) and those temporarily unemployed due to the nature of their job--like a lifeguard (season unemployment) were included in the official unemployment numbers.

Also--"seasonal" and "frictional" employment--which are part of a normal, healthy economy--make up about 3-4 percent of the unemployment number. So full employment is around 4 percent.

Any clarification on this is most appreciated. :)

[TahitiNut]

22. Yep. You got it wrong.

"Unemployment" is reported monthly by the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) using data gathered by the Bureau of the Census (in the Current Population Survey) and directly from corporations (in the Current Establishment Survey). There are six measures of "unemployment" (U1 thru U6) using varying definitions, typically having to do with marginally attached workers, involuntarily part-time workers, and underemployed workers. Even so, many people who might otherwise be working aren't counted.

It has nothing to do with Unemployment Insurance. Nothing.

It's also a fiction that "full employment is around 4 percent." Four percent of what??? The reported "unemployment rate" fell below 4% several times in 2000, and has been as low as 3.4% in the last 40 years.


Here're some useful links ...
http://www.bls.gov/cps/
http://www.bls.gov/ces/
http://www.bls.gov/bls/employment.htm

[Muddy Waters Guitar]

21. This is why Europe and US have such diverging figures

On unemployment, the difference is a mirage-- Europeans tend to count those "discouraged" workers as well as those actively seeking employment, in their unemployment tallies. A shame, b/c they're more aware of the scale of the problem while we continue to ignore the true extent of it here.