Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush-fluffer Fox headline: "Hunt for Bin Laden Still On"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 07:09 PM
Original message
Bush-fluffer Fox headline: "Hunt for Bin Laden Still On"
DEAD OR ALIVE!

Yeee-haw!

Osama can RUN, but the bitch can't HIDE!

Prezznint Butch will SMOKE HIM OUT OF HIS CAVE!

What?

It's been 41 months since the 9/11 attacks?

But Fox has pictures of Dead Uday and Dead Qusay and Captured Saddam accompanying this story! No more torture and rape rooms!

USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,148516,00.html

"Hunt for Bin Laden Still On"

"We haven't had real, solid information since the Tora Bora campaign on his location," Rep. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., told FOXNews.com in an interview, referring to the late 2001 battle around the cave complex along Afghanistan's mountainous eastern border, aimed at killing or capturing bin Laden and his Al Qaeda fighters.

Just how many U.S. resources are being put into the search may be more difficult to ascertain these days. While President Bush mentioned the terror mastermind by name more than 10 times in his 2004 State of the Union address, bin Laden wasn't named once by the president during this year's address.

"It isn't the local Iraqis that are a threat to me in Boston," Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy recently told the Boston Herald. "It's Al Qaeda (search) that is the threat to us here … it is unfortunate and tragic we haven't been able to apprehend him after all this period of time." Kennedy, a Democrat, noted the lack of mention of bin Laden in Bush's 2005 State of the Union address. "Why'd he mention him one year ago 15 times? Now he doesn’t mention him at all."

When asked in December how the search for bin Laden is going, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said: "The war on terrorism is much broader than any one person" but reiterated the theme that the Al Qaeda network has been smashed. A month earlier, when asked if the United States was still actively looking for the ringleader, McClellan responded: "Yes, we are continuing to pursue him and he will be brought to justice. We are also continuing to move forward on dismantling and destroying the Al Qaeda network, and we have made great progress over the course of the last few years. But there is more to do. And we continue to stay on the offensive."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. 1263 days, 8 hours, and 25 minutes
That Osama bin Laden has been free since the first plane hit the WTC.

http://www.osamaclock.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can see Osama shuffling in cave right now
I coulda been somebody, I coulda been a contender...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who?
As the Bush administration would say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. 2046 President J.Bush says "we're closing in on BinLaden"
Did you know that water is wet in its liquid stage? How's that for real solid information. "The war on terrorism is much broader than any one person" . That's why it'll never end, until everyone is destroyed. About time to turn another corner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Bin Laden May Be in Afghanistan"
That's what they said last month. Hell, he may be
hiding out in my back yard...I'll be right back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmutt Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. They cut to commercial too quick
I think it was supposed to say "Hunt for Bin Laden Still On Back Burner" . I think the list goes something like this: (1) Suck Iraqi oil fields dry, (2) Invade Iran just because Bush likes to play cowboy, and (3) Find Bin Laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Bush Fluffer! LOL!!!!
I love it! I'll use it, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. His freedom part of the 9/11 New Deal n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Who was the "bad" guy in 1984? Goldstein?
Bin Laden is George's Goldstein, and he will NEVER catch him, he will never outlaw abortion, he will never get a gay marriage ban amendment, etc.

He needs his bogey men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC