CondaLEZZY?

[tinanator]

apparently, this is actually the case. how come nobody told me before?

[elshiva]

1. What, are you calling her a lesbian?

I hope not! We don't want her. Ewwww!

[elshiva]

4. Let me qualify that.

We (the lesbians and female bisexuals like me) do not want her.
It has nothing to do with be pretty. It has everything to do with her being pure evil and working for the arch-homophobe.

[tuvor]

2. Uh, it's irrelevant to the fact that she's plain evil?

Don't know and don't care.

[Oreo]

3. so now that you've typed it

we can officially say:
"some people are saying that Condi is a lesbian"

even if she was... even if she admitted to a lurid affair with pickles... nothing would happen. MSM would ignore it

[tinanator]

7. some people say

some people know
not me
excuse me, I think thats the FBI at the doo

[johncoby2]

5. Isnt that a tri-fecta?

Twice in one administration.

[stubertmcfly]

6. i am so sick of this...

...bullshit. i thought this board was about democratic values and tolerance. seems that of late everything is "gay this" and "lesbian that". WHO GIVES A FLYING FUCK WHO GANNON OR CONDI OR WHOMEVER IS SLEEPING WITH?!?!?!

yes, i understand... the republican double standard. well shit. if we can't slam these people for their tendencies towards illegalities, lying, etc. then we ARE in a worse state than i ever could imagine.

the gannon scandal should be about the fact that this administration is manipulating the press and breaking the rules left and right. and that the msm is ignoring this fact (since they are complicit). sure, gannon being a prostitute is certainly icing on the cake but who really cares if he is gay or not. we shouldn't. it makes us, and this board, look like a bunch of goddamned homophobes and i, for one, am pretty fucking sick of it.

is rice a lesbian? who gives a rat's ass. what i do know is that she is a LIAR, she FAILED in her duty to protect this country, and for this, she was promoted by perhaps the most corrupt "president" in the history of this nation. these are the issues on which we should focus our attention not idiotic threads questioning her sexual proclivities. sure, if she were doing something illegal (like molesting collies) then that would be something of interest. we should let a consenting adult do whatever she wants to whomever (consenting adult) she wants and leave that out of any and all discussion. until we do, we are not much better than the shithead, gay-bashing repukes we hold ourselves above.

seriously. </rant>

[ldf]

8. so hypocrisy is no longer

a valid criticism?

ok, if you say so.

[nickgutierrez]

9. I'm going to lock this.

This thread is inflammatory, and comes without any supporting evidence.