Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here is how people get "Hannityized"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:32 PM
Original message
Here is how people get "Hannityized"

:wtf:

I signed up to their forum two days ago. I was VERY polite but I stated my case against the war and from the help of someone here at DU I was able to post a sort of "history lesson" about why the Middle East does not like Americans very much. (The Shah of Iran/US coup story). I spent a lot of time on that damned thing.


WELL I CHECKED TODAY AND I AM BLOCKED! THAT IS HOW THEY GET THEIR FOLLOWING! ALL PERTINENT INFORMATION IS CENSORED! :grr:

What a down right disgusting slimy piece of pond scum that Hannity is, a mutant clump of moecules that fell together on a trash heap, a two bit friggin "media" hack who appeals to the two digit IQ'S of America. Gannon is probably his boy toy just like the other Right Winged Nutted media whores out there.

I wonder if he is being paid by the good old White/Black House? I think someone should do some more investigating on the STUPID IMBECILES that have hold of our airwaves and internet and see just who is on the take. I wouldn't know where to begin but I'm sure someone here does. :nuke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who do you think you are fooling...
it is obvious that you hate freedom and Christmas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave123williams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Post that here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. I ended up with 4 open Word programs that I was compiling from
And editing it one the site. I deleted them because I figured I could get the end product form that website.

I get a good link though. I think I can find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Here's one link
This is not one of the links I refereed to but it was one I just found. The others reported how oppressive the Ayatollahs regime was and how it would, of course cause a lot of friction between Iran and the US. I also found a site where Madelin Aldrich kind of apologized for our actions.


I spend a lot more time on this when I posted over there. I'm frigging tired now.

"In 1953 a CIA coup replaced the democratic government of Mossadeq Hussain in Iran with a monarchy so that Iran could become a client serving US interests in the Middle East."

http://www.glocaleye.org/forpoldem.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. Stange how I can get in from one of their emails
I still can't log in if I go directly to the site BUT, I followed that told me to click on a link to confirm my registration and I got in. I wonder if that link is not going work now that I am posting this here? Here is the gist of what I said. Note that I copied some lines that bright people here on DU gave me:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
“Our double standards and opportunism go farther. In the deeply troubled Middle East, the United States not only protects the Saudi and other family dictatorships, it imposed the dictatorship of the Shah on Iran by a U.S.-organized coup in 1953, and in the 1980s it actively supported Saddam Hussein, even helping him obtain and use "weapons of mass destruction," as he fought Iran and attacked his own Kurds. The discovery that he was a bad man by invading Kuwait in 1990, and the subsequent war and extended boycott imposed on Iraq in the 1990s, may strike others as hypocritical and opportunistic. Similarly, the fact that the U.S. allows Israel alone to maintain a nuclear arsenal, and protects each and every one of its incursions into Lebanon, and steady dispossession of Palestinian homes, land, and water, arouses immense anger in the Middle East.

The American people are largely protected from understanding why large numbers hate us by politicians and pundits who demonize our enemies, stress the positives-and we do decent things, and support democracies, when not in conflict with business demands - and refuse to admit the elements of self-interest, opportunism, and double standards in our actions, that are so obvious to many people abroad.”

Dr. Donald Wilber - CIA

http://www.windweaver.com/politics/terrorism.htm

“Click on “Why do they hate us?’
_________________




Joined: 26 Feb 2005
Posts: 7



I may have twisted those links up. I certainly did not past all of the information I intended to. My apologies.

"The coup was a turning point in modern Iranian history and remains a persistent irritant in Tehran-Washington relations. It consolidated the power of the shah, who ruled with an iron hand for 26 more years in close contact with the United States. He was toppled by Iranian Revolution of 1979. Later that year, "Students of Imam Line" went to the American Embassy, took diplomats hostage and declared that they had unmasked a "nest of spies" who had been manipulating Iran for decades.

The Islamic government of Ayatollah Khomeini supported terrorist attacks against American interests largely because of the long American history of supporting the shah's suppressive regime. Even under more moderate rulers, many Iranians still resent the United States' role in the coup and its support of the shah.

Former US Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright, in an address, acknowledged the coup's pivotal role in the troubled relationship and came closer to apologizing than any American official ever has before.

"The Eisenhower administration believed its actions were justified for strategic reasons," she said. "But the coup was clearly a setback for Iran's political development. And it is easy to see now why many Iranians continue to resent this intervention by America in their internal affairs."

The history spells out the calculations to which Dr. Albright referred in her speech. Britain, it says, initiated the plot in 1952. The Truman administration rejected it, but President Eisenhower approved it shortly after taking office in 1953, because of fears about oil and Communism.



http://www.iranchamber.com/history/coup53/coup53p1.ph

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. you'd get 'blocked' here too if you posted against the grain. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:37 PM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Salviati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Not really, if you're well spoken and put thought into what you say...
It's just that most of the conservtive leaning folks that come around here either 1) are swayed by the light of reason, or 2) decend into ad hominim attacks, flamebaiting, or howard sternite style attention grabbing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwentyFive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I've never been blocked.
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 02:40 PM by TwentyFive
If you just post something to get flamed, you will get blocked.

I've posted several things that don't get said in Democratic circles...and not once have they been blocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. BS alert
I post "against the grain" here quite frequently. I think you will find that debate is tolerated well here at DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I refer you to the DU message board rules, which state:
"If you think overall that George W. Bush is doing a swell job, or if you wish to see Republicans win, or if you are generally supportive of conservative ideals, please do not register to post, as you will likely be banned."

Don't be so short-sighted as to think I disagree with this position. My point is that it's a little hypocritical for the original poster to complain about getting banned at Hannity's site because he/she argued (no matter how politely) against the conservative agenda.

The same thing happens here...all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Even if you posted respectfully?
I was more than polite with these people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flakey_foont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. But doesn't Hannitization
cause you to go blind and grow hair on your palms???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Apparently because they seemed quite Neanderthal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mindem Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Welcome to the world of repuke fascism N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Hannity is preaching to the choir - there a lost cause...
who have lost there ability to reason. He and his frothy followers will vote for am earthworm, as long as it's a republican. Are his numbers growing or hovering in one place? If they're growing then that's harmful. If not - let them spin themselves into a righty frenzy for all I care.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hannity is the worst
I listen to RW hate radio when I can (it's my irritainment!)

Hannity is the worst 'cause he sounds like everybodys friend. He is a master at controlling all of his interviews to not let people get a word in edgewise, and leading them to say what HE wants them to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Savage scares me more.....
That guy is downright mean and hateful.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I was listening to Hannity and this woman
called in who said as a Christian, she felt his "ways" were turning people off from the right side. She said her father was a perfect example so they called him up. The dad stuck to his guns and told the Hannity that he was mean, cruel, loudmouthed and unfair. All Hannity wanted to do was argue with him over the issues. He's so stupid. He thinks that if he's right about something then he "wins" but what he doesn't see is that he's turning fence sitters off in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iLoveKPOJ Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. You still don't get "It" yet
I highly recommend you read George Lakoff's "Don't Think of an Elephant". Only then will you understand why the "Facts" DO NOT MATTER when you talk to these people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. oh lordy, yes.
facts mean nothing 2 neo-cons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Totally agree - that's why I say forget about them...
and focus on independants, fence sitters, and not losing disallusioned dems.
Forget about the hannity/rush worshippers - lost cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC