Dean: "absurd insinuation" true--"not safer" true

[skjpm]

Just after Bush accused Dean of making the absurd insinuation that he could have known about 9/11, the investigating committee, while not directly naming Bush, says roughly the same thing. Just after Dean says we are not safer with Saddam in custody, we go on orange alert. This I why I support Dean. How many times have the other candidates been right? Kerry was wrong about the war--Twice! Gephardt was in the Rose Garden. How many times does Dean get to be right before his doubters, such as Kerry and Lieberman, start giving credit where credit is due?

[ParanoidPat]

1. Wrong forum!

:spank: :evilgrin: 1 demerit!

[wanderingbear]

3. I tought this was general discussion??

How can this be the wrong fourm.

[Terwilliger]

6. there is a General Discussion for the 04 political campaign

separate from this forum

[JanMichael]

8. What Terwilliger said. It'll be moved.

No probs.

[wanderingbear]

2. 40 years..

It takes people a while to break out of old habits.

[skjpm]

4. oops--my bad. can moderators switch to 2004 forum?

n/t

[Triana]

5. dean knows...

...where the bushit in the buckwheat, and he says so and does not back down. He continues to impress me with this.

[Terwilliger]

7. I'm not a Dean supporter, but I agree

seems like the establishment Dems are looking for anything to nail Dean on, then spinning anything he gets right as a reason why he's not truthful

those tactics seem quite familiar...

[wanderingbear]

9. The Office of Homeland Security scares me..

It sound like something out of an Old Orwell noval,Or the Ghost of the Nazi SS.