Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nothing has changed... from 1973

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 10:12 PM
Original message
Nothing has changed... from 1973
Local PBS ran an anniversary program about Watergate, from two years ago. Sam Dash was interviewed and at some point he was talking about the White House that had "enemies," not opponents. That they used the guise of "national security" to investigate and harass people, that many of them would wear a pin on their lapels of the American flag and that they would refer to their enemies as unpatriotic. And he was talking about 1973..

And I was also thinking about those days when Republican senators like Baker and Weicker had integrity, that they were what the Republican party once stood for, that they cared about the country and compared to the Frist and the Santorum of today, complete ignorant and crude.

Another memory of Dash: when they finally went to the Supreme Court to get the White House tapes, Nixon's lawyers - constitutional experts, said Dash - claimed that the President is like Louis the 14 - an absolute ruler above the law... for four years at a time.

The Supreme Court voted 8-0 against Nixon and, again, I have to wonder how it would have voted now. Also, how can anyone possibly compare the obvious obstruction of justice and disregarding the Constitution with what Clinton did with Monica.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's no secret how the SCOTUS would have ruled now
5-4 for Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And. I doubt we would have a judge like Sirica
who would bravely rule against the White House
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDebug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Somehow it even looks like 1973 was better
At least there was some more free press back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And how!
And we had some decent Republicans in Congress back then. Absent these two esential elements we're doomed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC