Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some reporters need to hear from us! SPELL CHECKING for bush!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Griffy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 10:37 PM
Original message
Some reporters need to hear from us! SPELL CHECKING for bush!
Check out the bradblog story.. sad that these shills have to try to make the president not appear naked... desipte he has no clothes!

I suggest we call these people tomorrow, or email them... and shame them as the spineless spell checking stenographers they have become.. and dare them to report the truth! I will mention DSM and tell them to call John Conyers office for the real story! what.. not CREDIBLE enough for you sir... LOL!

http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00001435.htm

<snip>

(bush at recent press conf.) "In terms of the detainees, we've had thousands of people detained. We've investigated every single complaint against the detainees. It seemed like to me they based some of their decisions on the word of -- and the allegations -- by people who were held in detention, people who hate America, people that had been trained in some instances to disassemble -- that means not tell the truth. And so it was an absurd report. It just is."


The Leader of the Free World apparently meant "dissemble" (which means to not tell the truth, as he helped us to understand in his charming 4th-Grader-Defines-Newly-Learned-Word sorta way) as opposed to "disassemble" which, we are fairly certain, means something entirely different.

But never misunderestimate the American Media's "Liberal Bias" in working overtime to keep their "President" from looking too terribly stupid! Here's just a few examples (and there are many more) of how they covered for him...

Mark Silva in Chicago Tribune:


Bush said that "it seemed like to me (Amnesty International) based some of their decisions on the word of, and the allegations, by people who were held in detention, people who hate America, people that had been trained in some instances to dissemble. That means not tell the truth. And so it was an absurd report."


William Douglas for Knight Ridder Newspapers:


"It seemed to me they based some of their decisions on the word of -- and the allegations -by people who were held in detention, people who hate America, people that had been trained in some instances to dissemble -- that means not tell the truth," Bush said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Related DU posts "disassemble"
Use the "search" feature for the word

disassemble -- that means not tell the truth
Topic started by paineinthearse on May-31-05 09:16 PM (26 replies)
Last modified by paineinthearse on Jun-01-05 08:19 AM
Bush lied about the definition of "dissassemble"...
Topic started by jayctravis on May-31-05 09:02 PM (8 replies)
Last modified by Singular73 on May-31-05 11:46 PM
Senators need confirmation by the Senate to be seated????
Topic started by paineinthearse on May-31-05 08:53 PM (4 replies)
Last modified by alfredo on May-31-05 09:11 PM
Why doesn't the press use "sic" when quoting Bush?
Topic started by baby_bear on May-31-05 08:13 PM (8 replies)
Last modified by jayctravis on May-31-05 09:01 PM

...and several others.

Note the stricking resemblence between "Why doesn't the press use "sic" when quoting Bush?" and the new Bradblog post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC