Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Moral Equivalency - by Harry Shearer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 07:53 AM
Original message
Moral Equivalency - by Harry Shearer

Moral Equivalency - by Harry Shearer The Huffington Post

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/harry-shearer/moral-equivalency_2195.html

"It was a standard response by Reagan-era Republicans to criticisms of the US--as supporting brutal dictatorships in Central America that happened to be pro-American, for example--that there was no "moral equivalency" between the United States and the Soviet Union. We've seen this same approach taken recently in the kerfuffle over Amnesty International's use of the "gulag" metaphor. Even though Jeane Kirkpatrick and other equally deep thinkers tried to imbue the phrase with layers of sophistication and meaning, at bottom its import is simple--we're the good guys, so what we do, even when it's bad, isn't as bad as what the bad guys do.

Now we're coming to the end (one hopes) of the week-long news cycle in which various figures from the Watergate era meet on television to hash out the unmasking of Deep Throat. Having seen these characters all week, I have to admit I was still stunned to see Richard Ben Veniste of the Watergate prosecutor's office sitting (virtually) next to G. Gordon Liddy, convicted Watergate felon, to discuss the matter with Chris Wallace on Sunday. Before you rush to knee-jerk anti-Foxism, I'll be glad to point out similar pairings on the other cable nets.

But did no one ask Chris or his booker, "Are we, by this pair of bookings, declaring a moral equivalency between the prosecutor and the ones he prosecuted?" What other crime story would get such weirdly even-handed treatment? Can we look forward to Vincent Bugliosi and Susan Atkins side-by-side on Court TV for a leisurely look back at the Charles Manson case? Were there no Watergate-era Nixon supporters (aside from the ubiquitous Pat Buchanan) available who hadn't had their tickets punched by a Federal warden?

Where's Jeane Kirkpatrick when we need her?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Love it! kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Moral Degeneracy
Edited on Tue Jun-07-05 08:09 AM by SpiralHawk
Is the equivalency I see. Corporate media gives the convicted criminals a Golden Republican Moment to lecture the nation on morality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just presenting both sides of criminal conduct, the guilty and proud v. DA
Next week, a discussion of pedophilia. In the interests of balance, a convicted unreformed child molester confronts his victim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why don't they interview some democratic voters of the time - since
they were the intended victims of the crimes.

They have switched it so the burglars and bag-men are made to look the victims.

Pathetic!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC