Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

10 Dems caved on the Janice Brown cloture vote.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:04 PM
Original message
10 Dems caved on the Janice Brown cloture vote.
Motion To Invoke Cloture On The Nomination of Janice R. Brown, of California, To Be U.S. Circuit Judge. Dems who voted with the rethugs: Byrd (D-WV), Carper (D-DE), Conrad (D-ND), Inouye (D-HI), Landrieu (D-LA), Lieberman (D-CT), Nelson (D-FL), Nelson (D-NE), Pryor (D-AR), Salazar (D-CO)

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00130#position

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 109th Congress - 1st Session
as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate

Vote Summary

Question: On the Cloture Motion (Motion To Invoke Cloture On The Nomination of Janice R. Brown, of California, To Be U.S. Circuit Judge)
Vote Number: 130 Vote Date: June 7, 2005, 12:01 PM
Required For Majority: 3/5 Vote Result: Cloture Motion Agreed to
Nomination Number: PN201
Nomination Description: Janice R. Brown, of California, to be United States Circuit Judge for the District of Columbia Circuit

Vote Counts: YEAs 65
NAYs 32
Not Voting 3

Grouped By Vote Position YEAs ---65
Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Allen (R-VA)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burns (R-MT)
Burr (R-NC)
Byrd (D-WV)
Carper (D-DE)
Chafee (R-RI)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Coleman (R-MN)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dole (R-NC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Frist (R-TN)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Inouye (D-HI)
Isakson (R-GA)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Roberts (R-KS)
Salazar (D-CO)
Santorum (R-PA)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stevens (R-AK)
Sununu (R-NH)
Talent (R-MO)
Thomas (R-WY)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)

NAYs ---32
Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Obama (D-IL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wyden (D-OR)

Not Voting - 3
Jeffords (I-VT)
Kohl (D-WI)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've lost track...which one was she?
Was she part of the deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. shes part of the damn deal
and arguably the worst of the lot, although its hard to tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. so....why are we surprised?
We knew this would happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I am not surprised I am disgusted.
What exactly was the upside of this deal? Oh never mind, we've hashed this all out and nobody is going to change his mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. The "deal" did not include Dems crossing over the aisle to side with the
rethugs.

Notice who the are, the DINO's, the usual demo lites.

Remember their names when they ask for cash or your support for re-election.

At least Feinstein voted "no"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Byrd is a 'DINO' and a 'demo lite?'
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Maybe she's the one that won't pass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. All three will pass.
The "One nominee is in trouble" was just cheese for the trap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, she was. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. that explains why Byrd had to vote for her. He brokered the deal and
he's a "man of his word." Maybe a few of the others were involved with saving the Filibuster and they had to join in.

I wish they had allowed the filibuster to go down and just walked out of the Senate in protest. But, I guess they felt "anarchy" would be unwise and dangerous. I hope to hell these ten didn't promise to go along with
putting Olsen or Asscroft on the Supreme Court though.

I hope that would go to far even for them in being true to a bargain. Sheesh.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Edited message cause i was wrrrong. The Deal was not to filibuster
Edited on Tue Jun-07-05 02:11 PM by rhett o rick
making it necessary to vote for cloture. He doesn't however have to vote for her confirmation. That's where we will see whose side who is on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Ahhhh the "Cloture Vote." That makes a difference. I can't bear to watch
C-Span for these votes so thought it was the final vote. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. She's totally pro-corporation and anti-freedom
Check out the PFAW site. They have a nice write up on her. If a corporation decides to kill it's retiring employees, based on her past history, she would rule that they had the Constitutional right to do so. She has never ruled against a corporation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here come the corporations, and there goes the pathetic excuse for a party
that claims to be for the people.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. We will see why the 10th is the second most important court.
Not a single vandal crossed party lines. Terrific...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plausible Donating Member (386 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. She's the one who
Edited on Tue Jun-07-05 01:16 PM by Cloud Walker
said senior citizens are cannibals on their grandchildren.
who said housing assistance for low income elderly and disabled unconstitutional.
Brown opposed effort to prevent sale of cigarettes to children.

Brown said age discrimination is not discrimination.

Voted against striking down a state anti-discminiaton law that provided a contraceptive drug benefit to women.

Brown said county did not have a right to sue electric utility for price fixing.
Brown the only member of the court to find a jury should not hear expert testimony in a domestic violence case about battered women's syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kindigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. But , but, but.....
she's the daughter of a sharecropper! :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
second edition Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. I just hope it stops at three!
It bothers me to give them even an inch because they will use it against us later on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. Maybe
she should have been born a few generations ago - her along with Clarance Thomas, and maybe then she would have seen what their ancestors faced.

Knowing them, they would excuse the oppression and justify it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. The vote has been delayed until tomorrow at 5PM as Dems will use all the
time alloted to continue to oppose her. Kennedy is speaking against her nomination on the Senate at this very moment.

Not all those who voted for cloture, will be voting for Brown--most, perhaps all, will vote against her in the "up or down vote" tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I'm really annoyed with some Dems talking about how they oppose
her but will vote for her anyway, it's a waste of time. D*mn I wish they'd have some balls and just stand up for the little guy just once, and I'm still so pissed about that bankruptcy bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Think it was Lindsay Graham who implied that Rogers could lose "up or
Edited on Tue Jun-07-05 02:01 PM by flpoljunkie
down vote." We will see tomorrow. When George Will says Rogers is "out of the mainstream," she is obviously way out of the mainstream.

Me, too, about the bankruptcy bill. If the Democrats do not introduce legislation to ameloriate some of its worst aspects, they can expect their grassroots fund raising to continue to be less than it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. It would be nice if the Democrats would stick together, but in the end
it doesn't really matter. The pukes have the votes, we don't, bend over and take it. Maybe when they vote on her nomination some Republicans and all Democrats will vote "no." That's when it counts. (I know . . . I'm dreaming.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. It's possible, don't lose faith
Snow, Collins, Hagle, Chaffee, perhaps a couple more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spectral Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. sorry to be ignorant, but what is "cloture"?
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. The end of debate
A vote cannot take place until debate is closed via cloture (60 votes).

Tomorrow, the up or down vote takes place (50 votes).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I think you meant to type she needs 51 votes to be confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yes...sorry
51.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. They are simply abiding by the agreement that was made
to avert the nuclear option. You didn't expect them to break their word, did you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC