Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

About this 85+% reelection stat that they keep quoting for Brown..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 04:14 PM
Original message
About this 85+% reelection stat that they keep quoting for Brown..
How many people do you know that mark down for a judge on the ballot and don't know a blessed thing about them beyond the fact that they haven't heard anything bad about them? This stat is bogus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I believe she was the only person running in that race.
And the actual stat was 76%, if I'm not mistaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Exactly. She was uncontested
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'd like to see the CA ballot she got this percentage on.
I bet it was tweny pages long and her election was buried so far back that only the fundies and organized right wingers found her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandomom Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Uncontested cannibalization
of our American way of press reports. How many times will we hear GOPers announce "she won 80% of the vote" and NOT ONE SO-CALLED REPORTER bothers/dares/dreams to mention that she was uncontested? The line should be, "she was the only candidate for the judgeship but 20% of Californians chose NONE OF THE ABOVE. Why was that? We can show you why."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC