Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich on Downing Street Memo and action you can take

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 02:07 PM
Original message
Kucinich on Downing Street Memo and action you can take
FRom the front page of Kucinich.us

Demand President Bush Respond to Inquiry About 2002 Meetings Discussing Pretext for War

Dennis Kucinich and more than 90 other Members of Congress signed a letter to President Bush written by Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI), Ranking Minority Member of the House Judiciary Committee, seeking answers to troubling questions raised by the leaked minutes of a U.S./U.K. meeting in 2002. According to the minutes of this meeting, published on May 1 by the London Times and now commonly known as the Downing Street Minutes (or, incorrectly, the Downing Street Memo), U.S. and U.K. officials met months before Congress was consulted about going to war and discussed creating a pretext for the invasion of Iraq. The minutes include the following quote about an earlier meeting between the head of British Military Intelligence and the Bush Administration:

"Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime's record. There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action."

We are all being asked to sign a letter similar to the one the Members of Congress sent. Somewhere around 100,000 signatures already have been collected and Rep. Conyers has announced an updated goal of 250,000. Sign the letter at http://www.johnconyers.com. The letters ask President Bush to answer the following questions:

Do you or anyone in your administration dispute the accuracy of the leaked document?
Were arrangements being made, including the recruitment of allies, before you sought Congressional authorization to go to war? Did you or anyone in your Administration obtain Britain's commitment to invade prior to this time?
Was there an effort to create an ultimatum about weapons inspectors in order to help with the justification for the war as the minutes indicate?
At what point in time did you and Prime Minister Blair first agree it was necessary to invade Iraq?
Was there a coordinated effort with the U.S. intelligence community and/or British officials to "fix" the intelligence and facts around the policy as the leaked document states?

SIGN THE LETTER TO PRESIDENT BUSH Demand President Bush Respond to Inquiry About 2002 Meetings Discussing Pretext for War
Dennis Kucinich and more than 90 other Members of Congress signed a letter to President Bush written by Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI), Ranking Minority Member of the House Judiciary Committee, seeking answers to troubling questions raised by the leaked minutes of a U.S./U.K. meeting in 2002. According to the minutes of this meeting, published on May 1 by the London Times and now commonly known as the Downing Street Minutes (or, incorrectly, the Downing Street Memo), U.S. and U.K. officials met months before Congress was consulted about going to war and discussed creating a pretext for the invasion of Iraq. The minutes include the following quote about an earlier meeting between the head of British Military Intelligence and the Bush Administration:

"Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime's record. There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action."

We are all being asked to sign a letter similar to the one the Members of Congress sent. Somewhere around 100,000 signatures already have been collected and Rep. Conyers has announced an updated goal of 250,000. Sign the letter at http://www.johnconyers.com. The letters ask President Bush to answer the following questions:

Do you or anyone in your administration dispute the accuracy of the leaked document?
Were arrangements being made, including the recruitment of allies, before you sought Congressional authorization to go to war? Did you or anyone in your Administration obtain Britain's commitment to invade prior to this time?
Was there an effort to create an ultimatum about weapons inspectors in order to help with the justification for the war as the minutes indicate?
At what point in time did you and Prime Minister Blair first agree it was necessary to invade Iraq?
Was there a coordinated effort with the U.S. intelligence community and/or British officials to "fix" the intelligence and facts around the policy as the leaked document states?
SIGN THE LETTER TO PRESIDENT BUSH Demand President Bush Respond to Inquiry About 2002 Meetings Discussing Pretext for War
Dennis Kucinich and more than 90 other Members of Congress signed a letter to President Bush written by Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI), Ranking Minority Member of the House Judiciary Committee, seeking answers to troubling questions raised by the leaked minutes of a U.S./U.K. meeting in 2002. According to the minutes of this meeting, published on May 1 by the London Times and now commonly known as the Downing Street Minutes (or, incorrectly, the Downing Street Memo), U.S. and U.K. officials met months before Congress was consulted about going to war and discussed creating a pretext for the invasion of Iraq. The minutes include the following quote about an earlier meeting between the head of British Military Intelligence and the Bush Administration:

"Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime's record. There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action."

We are all being asked to sign a letter similar to the one the Members of Congress sent. Somewhere around 100,000 signatures already have been collected and Rep. Conyers has announced an updated goal of 250,000. Sign the letter at http://www.johnconyers.com. The letters ask President Bush to answer the following questions:

Do you or anyone in your administration dispute the accuracy of the leaked document?
Were arrangements being made, including the recruitment of allies, before you sought Congressional authorization to go to war? Did you or anyone in your Administration obtain Britain's commitment to invade prior to this time?
Was there an effort to create an ultimatum about weapons inspectors in order to help with the justification for the war as the minutes indicate?
At what point in time did you and Prime Minister Blair first agree it was necessary to invade Iraq?
Was there a coordinated effort with the U.S. intelligence community and/or British officials to "fix" the intelligence and facts around the policy as the leaked document states?

SIGN THE LETTER TO PRESIDENT BUSH http://www.johnconyers.com/

READ REPUBLICAN CHAIR KEN MEHLMAN'S MEET THE PRESS INTERVIEW AT AFTERDOWNINGSTREET.ORG
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=50&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

EXTENSIVE BACKGROUND ON THIS STORY FROM OUR FORUM
http://www.kucinich.us/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2224

OUR PREVIOUS HOME PAGE ARTICLE
http://www.kucinich.us/archive/home/display.php?src=k_20050512_vend_zvahgrf.cuc



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush and Blair already responded at their press conference....
...they both lied and the outrage should now be to shout them down publicly wherever possible until an non-partisan independent council is appointed to investigate on both sides of the Atlantic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I guess you would have to define response.
His lies at the press conference weren't consistent with anything in reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's correct, but we won't hear anything else from either Bush....
...or Blair, so why waste any more time asking them to explain. They will go right on lying and using the ".... the world is better off without Saddam" repuke talking points.

The sooner the people/senate put an independent prosecutor on this to investigate and dig out the truth, the sooner we'll be these bastards out of power and behind bars where they belong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. With the courts stacked in favor of repubs, public outcry is the only hope
More political cartoons, more protests, more letters to the editor, more. "That's what 'more' means."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corbett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's Right! Here's A Quick Suggestion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Good link... "If true, such conduct constitutes a High Crime...
"If true, such conduct constitutes a High Crime under Article II, Section 4 of the United States Constitution: 'The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.'"

Mmm, doesn't mention blow jobs. Looks like what Bush has done is far, far worse in the eyes of the US CONSTITUTION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kucinich was in Anchorage a few days ago.. :o)
Edited on Wed Jun-08-05 06:17 PM by larissa
I didn't get a chance to see him.. but how cool that he's been up here twice in the past year! :bounce:

Kucinich in Anchorage >

edit to try link again.. grrrr..

http://www.ktuu.com/CMS/templates/alaska_news/master.asp?articleid=13675&zoneid=4

Ahhhh ratz.. I can't get the link to work for some reason :( ..It's under key words: KTUU Kucinich Anchorage in Google.

:shrug: Not sure why I can't get it to work.. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC