Anyone have stats on Starr's witch-hunt and Clinton's impeachment?

[Fire Walk With Me]

-How long did they search

-How many people did they subpoena

-How much (taxpayer) money did they spend

-How long did the whole thing take

Because the repubs deserve at least that much in response to the Iraq invasion, voting machine fraud, etc. It's a little favor they've done us, guiding us in how to question the most remotely absurd items as impeachable offenses, to spend millions of (taxpayer) dollars in a witch-hunt to do so. I'd say that we have a slightly better case. They've shown us how it's done, let's call this equal time for worse offenses.

Stats would be good for anyone who says that the DSM are old news or we need to move on. Simple facts about how THEY didn't say that Clinton was old news and we should move on.

And don't let them whine about it. Clinton admitted things and took his medicine. BushCo make merit in getting away with things; who is the real man here???

[sinkingfeeling]

1. It lasted 7 years and cost the taxpayers about $70 million.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200412030011

http://edition.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/02/01/starr.costs/

[Fire Walk With Me]

2. 70 Mil for impeachment? That's a bargain! Let's tap the Iraq invasion fund

and get our own impeachment going. Should take less than 7 years as well, which the public will be thankful for, so it's a win-win situation.

Maybe we can take the money from the $72 mil "bonus" they gave Halliburton. That's the ticket.

(Thanks!)