Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Re Downing Street Memo: Time for a full frontal assault

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
brindis_desala Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 08:35 AM
Original message
Re Downing Street Memo: Time for a full frontal assault
Thanks to AAR and MoveON The Downing Minutes have captured the public's attention. It's time to follow up. The evidence has been there all along. If everyone at DU sends the press their own quote from the following timeline with the question- why no follow-up? We might shame the corporate lackeys to justify their indifference.

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_timeline_of_the_2003_invasion_of_iraq&general_topic_areas=deception

In the meantime we start hammering the CPA's missing 8.8 billion.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5763483/

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/01/30/iraq.audit/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good point
It has been lost in the background noise. It is certainly time to move it to the forefront of the discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. May I also suggest a 'pointed' project? Every state must be represented
on DU...if at least five people from every state sent a letter to the editor(s) of the largest newspapers in their area - asking the newspaper to tell them how many journalists they have working on the minutes and the missing money....it could them know that the subject is still relevant. Point at the issues by asking a number question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good idea!
I will get busy on my five now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brindis_desala Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. great idea. we need a nationwide confrontation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LifeDuringWartime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. i wrote a LTTE shortly after we found out about the DSM
Edited on Sat Jun-11-05 12:46 PM by LifeDuringWartime
i think its been long enough that i can write another, but i am not sure. ill write one up right now.


edit: I have to wait until tomorrow to submit it, due to the 30 day rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brindis_desala Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Great! You might have a friend or two write too!
The beauty is the CCR timeline lays it all out there, step by step.
Every citizen should see it in black and white. The CPA's missing $8.8 billion should be headline news beside that the oil for food fiasco is a pittance. Appropriations committee?...silence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brindis_desala Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. More Talking points for LTTEs
January 2001
Shortly after George W. Bush is inaugurated, “ey personnel, long-time civilian professionals” at the Pentagon's Near East South Asia (NESA) desk are moved or replaced with people from neoconservative think tanks. Joe McMillan, the Office Director, is moved to a new location outside of the Pentagon, which according to Karen Kwiatkowski, who works at the NESA desk, is odd because “the whole reason for the Office Director being a permanent civilian (occasionally military) professional is to help bring the new appointee up to speed, ensure office continuity, and act as a resource relating to regional histories and policies.” Larry Hanauer, who has long been at the Israel-Syria-Lebanon desk and who is known to be “even-handed with Israel,” is replaced by David Schenker of the Washington Institute. Other veteran NESA employees who are banished include James Russell, who has served as the country director for Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, and Marybeth McDevitt, the country director for Egypt.
People and organizations involved: Larry Hanauer, David Schenker, Marybeth McDevitt, James Russell, Joe McMillan Additional Info
Statements:
Karen Kwiatkowski: * “The director's job in the time of transition was to help bring the newly appointed deputy assistant secretary up to speed, ensure office continuity, act as a resource relating to regional histories and policies, and hShelp identify the best ways to maintain course or to implement change. Removing such a critical continuity factor was not only unusual but also seemed like willful handicapping. It was the first signal of radical change” — March 10, 2004

snip < >

January 29, 2001
Imam Sayed Hassan al-Qazwini, who heads the Islamic Center of America in Detroit, one of the nation's largest mosques, meets with President Bush in the White House about the administration's policy towards Iraq. The president says he supports a policy aimed at removing Saddam Hussein from power, though he does not discuss by what means. “No method was discussed at all,” al-Qazwini will tell the New York Times two years later. “It was a general desire for regime change.” He will also tell the newspaper that he had spoken with Bush about removing Saddam Hussein a total of six or seven times, both before and after the 2000 elections.
People and organizations involved: Imam Sayed Hassan al-Qazwini, George W. Bush

(January 30, 2001)
The Bush White House holds its first National Security Council meeting. The lead discussion of the meeting centers on the need to remove Saddam Hussein from power. US Secretary of Treasury Paul O'Neill, recalling the meeting, will tell CBS News two years later: “From the very beginning, there was a conviction, that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go ... From the very first instance, it was about Iraq. It was about what we can do to change this regime. Day one, these things were laid and sealed.” O'Neill will say officials never questioned the logic behind this policy. No one ever asked, “Why Saddam?” and “Why now?” Instead, the issue that needed to be resolved was how this could be accomplished. “It was all about finding a way to do it,” O'Neill will explain. “That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this.’ ”

See IRAQ timeline at:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timelin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC