Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Session on Judicial nominations now-WTF

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 02:04 PM
Original message
Senate Session on Judicial nominations now-WTF
Oral Hatch is droning on and on about this Griffith guy. Griffith PARTICIPATED in the impeachment process for Clinton for the Rs? What kind of fresh insult is this to the Ds. I'm speechless. Talk about abused spouse syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Democracy White Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh how very Republican of them
I wonder if the Dems will use the filibuster on this?

Dee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They're lining up for a smooching session
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 02:11 PM by Skidmore
now. I'm so effin' disgusted, I could puke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tell me again about this great compromise
Harry Reid worked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't think Reid had much to do with it
Byrd is the architect of that deal I think.

BTW, I have been and continue to be against ANY compromise with these MF'ers. But I am a radical leftist, so it seems to those DLC boosters. You know, one that is hell bent on destroying our country by being intractable. Screw-em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Griffith is a BAD choice
He was practicing law in Utah with NO license. for one thing!

I posted a thread about him last week that died a quick death. I'll try to find the relevent points in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. More on Griffith
Thomas Griffith is an unqualified candidate for a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Not only has Griffith never had a position as a lower court judge at any level, but he has also repeatedly shown lack of respect for his profession by practicing law without a license for several years in two different states. While at a law firm in the District of Columbia, Griffith allowed his license to expire, yet continued to practice law in D.C. for over a year. Griffith then lied about the lapse in his license to Senator Patrick J. Leahy, claiming that the expiration notification had been sent to his former law firm when in fact the expiration had happened long before he even joined that firm.

Despite a provision in Utah law that prohibits lawyers from practicing in the state without passing the Utah Bar exam, Griffith has practiced law as the General Counsel of Brigham Young University for the past five years - unlicensed. Even though the General Counsel for the Utah Bar advised Griffith to take the Utah Bar exam, he has never done so. To make matters worse, Griffith has lied under oath about his standing as a lawyer. On the application for the Utah Bar (a test he never took), Griffith stated that he had never been suspended as an attorney when in fact he had been suspended from the District of Columbia Bar -- twice.

Griffith's disrespect for his own profession is just the tip of the iceberg. Griffith has a consistent record of hostility towards Title IX, the law guaranteeing equal educational opportunities for women and girls. If he gets his way, he will set back the progressive efforts for which Title IX proponents have fought long and hard. As a member of the Secretary of Education's wrongly-named Commission on Opportunity in Athletics in 2003, Griffith proposed a radical measure that would have eliminated one of the three alternative methods of school compliance with Title IX, the "substantial proportionality" test. Eliminating this method would have significantly undermined the effectiveness of Title IX. Even this stacked Commission, which contained a majority of members hostile to Title IX, soundly rejected Griffith's radical proposal by a vote of 11-4. Indeed, every federal appellate court to consider the test has rejected Griffith's view that the proportionality test is unconstitutional, and each of those courts has confirmed that the proportionality test does not violate Title IX or the Constitution. Griffith has dismissed those subsequent decisions as "wrong."

Furthermore, Griffith has identified himself with Senator Rick Santorum, R-Pa., a long-time opponent of reproductive rights and equal marriage. With his work in the ultra-conservative Federalist Society, Griffith espouses strong commitment to the states' rights framework, which would eviscerate enforcement of civil rights and environmental law. Additionally, through his speeches and writings, Griffith has made it clear that he believes the rule of law should be based in the Christian faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Griffith will be approved
I believe Griffith is very close to Hatch and will sail through the senate. I doubt the group of 14 will consider the fact that he failed to pay his bar dues at exceptional circumstances. The buddy system in the senate will provide enough support for this joker. I am still trying to find a single benefit of this MOU negotiated by the dems in the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC