Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I thought Kerry was going to make DSM an issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Broken Acorn Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 05:13 PM
Original message
I thought Kerry was going to make DSM an issue
I feel like he is the invisible man on this issue.

And please don't show me links to the 'raw story' speculation that he is getting signatures in the Senate.

I know Kerry was misquoted a few weeks back about giving a speech, but he definitely was supposed to do some type of action.

What is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. He still supports our staying there so who cares what he does?
It's an academic question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken Acorn Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Kerry might not have supported the war
If he knew the intelligence was fixed; thus the whole point of the DSM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. Wha? He has not retracted support for our being there
and has said knowing what we knew back in August 2004 (although not yet then a smoking gun), which was ample evidence of lies, that he would still vote for the war resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. As long a Kerry, or anyone else, supports the "don't cut and run" myth
they will remain silent accomplices of Bush's cruel occupation of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Racenut20 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kerry is a total WUSS. Please don't give us another New England
Yankee candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. I won't show you a Raw Story article
I will just direct you to the Downing Street Memo site, where there is an action alert to help Sen. Kerry gather as many signatures as possible.

http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/takeaction.html

No speculation. That is what he is doing.

As for me, I'm not worried about a dog and pony show. I don't need to see what's going on. There are more ways to deal with an issue than to shoot off one's mouth about it. All we know is that he said he would address the issue and that his office said there would be a speech at some point. Perhaps once he goes public with the letter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken Acorn Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Awesome!
Thanks Clarkie. I hadn't been to that page since it first came out and they updated the Kerry part. That is a good sign for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'd like to see the "Big Guns" like Kerry & Dean talk about this on TV.
I think that would be a great way to lend even more exposure to this bombshell.

As it is, Kerry says he is trying to get Senate involvement- I agree with the suggestion that it needs to be more than just a letter to Bush that he wont even read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken Acorn Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You're assuming * knows how to read
He can barely put phrases together to make sentences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Kerry Office says...
THere is no truth to the rumor about his letter....at least I read that from someone who had called the office. So I will believe it when I see it. Conyers stuck his neck out first then asked for support. What...Kerry wants to test the waters first to see if there is support before he sticks his neck out???? Same old Kerry...I won't hold my breath to see if he has the guts to speak out...My guess is NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I'll believe the Washington Post if you don't mind
What you've got sounds a bit too secondhand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. No offense, but your info is unverified.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. I had an email from his office
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 06:47 PM by kerrygoddess
Confirming the letter. I guess it's all in who you know.

Kerry's staff is very cautious about giving information. Hell all the Senator's staffers are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bravo411 Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. He also said he was running for President
But he did a piss-poor job of it as well.
Whenever the Republicans attacked him, he seemed to roll over like a scared puppy, then procede to piss oall over himself.

We need Dean on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I'm not into the Dean vs. Kerry thing- I like them both- but to be fair...
Dean has not said a single word about the memo- while Kerry has.

I'll forgive Kerry for his perceived shortcomings if I see him kick some GOP ass over this memo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. To be fair also
There was some stuff on the DNC website about the Memo. Would that have been Dean's doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:39 PM
Original message
I partially take it back then. I still want a Dean TV soundbyte.
Swing-voters wont see the DNC website- in fact, none of the DEMs in my office go to it either...

It appears that the "top DEMs" that I've complained so much about are getting it together-I hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I see nothing about the memo on the DNC website's front page.
Seems like it should be.

Are you talking about the old articles from June 3 & 5?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. The blog entry
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 06:56 PM by LittleClarkie
Looking at it, yeah it was on June 3rd.

Who's responsible for what goes on the blog. That entry was written by Jesse Berney.

http://www.democrats.org/blog/display/00012146.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. It wasn't RawStory speculation. It was a Washington Post story that Raw
picked up on.

Wouldn't you be more comfortable by reading the whole story including the link to WaPost article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. Could it be that Kerry & Reid are working together??? (link)
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 06:27 PM by Dr Fate
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1860028

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid demanded a full accounting of whether Bolton exaggerated U.S. assessments of several countries' weapons programs, one of the points made by critics of the contentious and long-stalled nomination.

"All over the news the last few days has been concerns about weapons of mass destruction by virtue of the memo that was discovered," the Nevada Democrat said, referring to the so-called "Downing Street memo."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Kerry, Reid, Kennedy, Durbin
Plus some DSM stuff on the DNC website. I think several of them are working together.

I did think I saw Kerry and Reid talking to each other on the Senate floor, and found myself wondering if they were planning stuff. Maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. All we heard was that Kerry was working the Senate urging others to join
him on the letter of inquiry. I would expect he started with Reid since he's the Dem leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken Acorn Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. I wish Dean was spearheading this issue
If we want main-stream traction, Dean is our guy.

He's been getting more press than any other Dem these days and any press is better than no press.


I just wish Kerry would SPEAK OUT about it. It would give us all hope. Btw, Conyers is an ass-kicker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Dean did offer the use of DNC rooms- but I agree- he needs to go on TV.
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 06:35 PM by Dr Fate
The press seems to like to repeat his quotes- perhaps today would be a great time for him to utter one his patented "controversial" statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. Don't hold your breath.
He's one of those 'see which way the wind is blowing' guys.

It's what screwed him up on IWR vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. At the hearing today Bonifaz is USING the IWR against Bush for impeachable
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 07:43 PM by blm
offense.

Just as I've been saying for a long time here. IWR stipulated that Bush had to make the determination for war AFTER he took proper measures to avoid war, especially weapons inspections.

Bush did not. In fact, the Rove media SPUN the IWR into congress giving Bush a blank check to do what he pleased.

The dumbest move from the left was to parrot those IWR talking points from Rove. The IWR should have been the reason to BLAME Bush all along, instead of the way it evolved into a blame Dems for voting for war.

Bonifaz said today the OFFICIAL document from Bush that was sent to Congress - AS DIRECTED BY THE IWR GUIDELINES - saying he determined Iraq to be a threat to national security after the weapons inspections just happens to be an impeachable offense as a FALSE STATEMENT in an official document. The DSM and the cooking of the intel proves the false statement was made knowingly.

The IWR would have prevented war if adhered to honestly. Too bad so many chose to ignore that fact in favor of adopting the Rovemedia spin that the IWR gave Bush all the support he needed to go to war.

I hope everyone LISTENS to Bonifaz closely at the rerun of the hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Anyone paying attention at the time
KNEW to a moral certainty that Bush used the IWR as a profilactic to authorize his warmongering.

How voting to give Smirk the authority to go to war (without further congressional oversight) is somehow construed as helping to prevent the war is quite a mind twister.

But, be my guest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Tell it to Bonifaz. Bush had to adhere to the IWR. He didn't. He wrote an
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 07:55 PM by blm
official document as per the IWR and he LIED. Under the False Statement Act, that's an impeachable offense.

If you have difficulty comprehending the guidelines in the IWR that Bush was supposed to follow, then that's your problem.

The point is that Bonifaz' testimony today PROVES how dumb it was of so many on the left to waste time attacking and blaming the IWR and those who voted for it, instead of blaimng ONLY BUSH for not implementing the guidelines of the IWR honestly.

Thankfully, Bonifaz knows what you refuse to consider and HE is making the case and not you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Go blm!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalloway Donating Member (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. Remember, impeachment starts in the House....gotta
build momentum there first. The Senate will come next, I am sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. He wasn't gonna concede either
Par for the course for Sen Kerry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I don't remember him saying that
God knows we can't go through every election litigating and never conceding ever. Without hard, take-it-to-court facts about fraud, there was going to be very little he could do.

What exactly were you looking for in the way of action.

He promised to make sure every vote got counted. And he is. He has no earthly reason to still be involved in litigation in Ohio. But he is. When he spoke out against suppression of the black vote, he got slapped down. He's co-sponsor of election reform legislation, but few remember that either.

Par for the course for Kerry is fighting for people who could give a shit about him. That includes many veterans, and some here I reckon. He's STILL opening his mouth for the BCCI folks who lost their money when that bank closed. And THEY can't even vote for the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. No, Edwards said count all the votes
Kerry had our backs.

Hopefully he will get that election reform bill passed.

You need to visit election2004 forum - there is evidence and quite a bit of it - coming out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
28. Kerry and other Dems are out on a limb that they are busy sawing off
The official position of Kerry and many other biggie Demos is that (an opinion held by 10% (!) of the population) we need more troops in Iraq. So get real here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC