Did everyone send Michael Kinsley a little memo/email?

[orleans]

this is a snip from f.a.i.r.
"Los Angeles Times editorial page editor Michael Kinsley opted for sarcasm over serious discussion, deriding activists in a June 12 column for sending him emails "demanding that I cease my personal cover-up of something called the Downing Street Memo." Kinsley kidded that the fuss was a good sign for the Left: "Developing a paranoid theory and promoting it to the very edge of national respectability takes ideological self-confidence."

What does Kinsley mean by paranoid? Criticizing the Times for not giving the story much attention would be accurate: Prior to the Bush-Blair press conference, a Nexis search shows one story about the Downing Street minutes appeared in the paper nearly two weeks after the story broke (5/12/05), and that columnist Robert Scheer mentioned it a few days later (5/17/05).

In fact, Kinsley's mocking seemed to serve no purpose, since his fallback position is a familiar media defense: We all knew the Bush administration wanted war, so this simply isn't news. As Kinsley put it, "Of course, you don't need a secret memo to know this." As for "intelligence and facts...being fixed around the policy," Kinsley eventually acknowledged that "we know now that this was true."

So, to follow Kinsley's logic: People who demand more Downing Street coverage have developed a "paranoid theory" that accurately portrays White House decision-making on Iraq. His only quarrel with what he calls a "vast conspiracy" pushing the mainstream media to take the memo more seriously is that the activists think such information is important, and should be brought to the attention of the public, whereas Kinsley--and apparently many others in the mainstream media--doesn't "buy the fuss." "

Los Angeles Times
Editorial & Opinion Editor
Michael Kinsley
[e-mail]

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2545

let's see the email you send michael. here's mine:

"subject: regarding your lack of interest in Downing Street Memo/Minutes

Michael!
What the hell is wrong with you?"

[otohara]

1. I Did

I was pissed, I used to love to read Kinsley. He's changed since becoming a mucky muck at LA Times

[Hissyspit]

2. Hunh?? Wanting accountability from lying, unethical leaders is paranoid?

WTF?

I mean, really...

WTF?

He's kidding, right?

[neuvocat]

3. Good post.

As far as that fallback argument you pointed out, it is true that everyone knows that Bush wanted war. But without the memo there just isn't any sort of solid proof.