Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The MSM is still blaming the Clintons for polarizing the country.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 01:45 AM
Original message
The MSM is still blaming the Clintons for polarizing the country.
"Joe Klein of Time magazine...believes a Hillary candidacy will polarize the country the way the reign of the Clintons polarized us in the 1990s."

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ucrr/20050617/cm_ucrr/theriseandriseofhillaryclinton


Umm...HELLO!!!

What about the last 5 years? Are we not more polarized now than ever before precisely because of the Republicans and their 'divide and deceive' tactics?

Why does the MSM never wonder about how polarizing your average republican (and by average, I mean right wing extremist fascist by any fair standard) candidate will be at a national level?

This is like saying we should blame women for going outside because they know there are rapists out there, and rapists can't be held responsible for their actions...when it should be the rapists who are be behind bars and having their freedom restricted!

Why do they still act as if it's the Clintons fault that the Republicans go nuclear (aka: nu-ku-lurr) when their name appears on the ballot?

Is no one supposed to stand up to these precious republicans, because it might piss them off once again and "force their hand" so they couldn't be held responsible for what smear tactic they used next? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. actually I thought it started in 98
boy was I wrong... it started in 92, when good ol Newt told his boys and girls NOT to talk across the aisle for 90 days to ahem, establish a new tone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Then why do they keep pumping up "Miss Inevitable"?
Gee, I wonder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. There is no wedge they need a wedge to sell their hate TV
Don't buy it the wedge...

No one likes Bush well except the other neocons.

Not even republicans, they all know he is worthless.

Couldn't even win an election twice. And still there is that wedge thing the media likes to throw at us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. Boy, this story gets old - one would think...
the sheeple would catch on after awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. The Kool Aid kids just can't get enough
of their own poison and losers just can't stand to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. The Clinton's didn't polarize the country... the repukes were used
to power and could abide it when they lost and the liberals had another populist. Like a bunch of spoiled little brats and 'masters of the universe' they frothed at the mouth and got to work in boiler-rooms all over the nation..digging, making up spin and doing everything to take Clinton down.

So privileged and anti-democratic are this crew..that they didn't accept the choice of the people and set to work and invested huge sums of money in dividing the country up into small enough bits that they could win.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. The polarization started before Clinton, and before Bush I.
It started at the very least under Nixon, hit the doldrums for a few years, and resurged under Reagan. Pretty much more doldrums under Bush I, and then it resurged around Clinton's early policies; when he ditched those, the "having an intern give the boss blow jobs in his office isn't sexual harrassment" moral morass, besides giving everybody whiplash, allowed further polarization.

I blame not the politicians, but the people too stupid or foolish to realize that extreme polarization is a great short-term political ploy, and who apparently like being manipulated. That kind of polarization has usually been used, but usually over single-issue campaigns ... seldom have two sides had their views packaged into extreme coalitions like they have today. In the absence of polarization, "safe" Congressional districts aren't, and secure "bases" start to unravel.

Although I do grant that it's difficult to even try to be reasonable and objective when one side is telling you how wonderful and brilliant you are, and how benighted and vile the other is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. Klein and his fellows n the Beltway scribbling class are responsible...
for polarization. They are suck ups and flacks. Lapdogs and lickspittles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. Uh no, Joe....
it's the Repubs fault. Newt startes this crap back in 1992.

:eyes:

I hate Joe Klein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Right wing hate radio polarized this country, & Bushco advances it
to a new level. The Clintons polarized nothing, unless good times are polarizing or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Anything to protect little Smirky
:grr: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC