Faux News discussing DSM and other condeming memos

[AUYellowDog]

I'm amazed, and their guest is discussing how several other memos make it even more condemning.

Brandon

[rateyes]

1. Who is their guest?

[Tandalayo_Scheisskopf]

2. Hmmm...

Clark hired, now this. Is Faux doing a little shift?

Nah. Never happen.

[asjr]

4. Maybe Rupert knows more than we do and is going

to flee the ship before it sinks. If he thought the Shrub was going to grow he would never change. Every rat is out for himself.

[Matariki]

9. I think Murdoch doesn't give a rat's ass about 'conservative' or 'liberal'

just money and influence.

[Tesla]

3. Oh, oh....

why don't I trust them?????

[AUYellowDog]

5. Sorry, I don't remember his name, Someone from Newsweek I think n/t

[mtnsnake]

6. Maybe this and the Clark hiring are a sign of good things to come,

not that Fox is trying to become good, but that they're starting to foresee that there just might be something serious to the DSM, and that once this all plays out they won't want to be on Bush's sinking ship.

Screw Fox. When Bush goes down, I hope he takes Fox, Rush, Sean, and everyone else of that nature with him.

[Nikki Stone 1]

7. Actually,I think it's a sign that the war in Iraq is becoming a lost cause

And the DSM is being used to slap Bush around a bit for losing.

[IndyOp]

8. Which approach is most common in the conversation?

It is already common knowledge that Bush lied about WMD

-or-

Bush did not lie - the memo is wrong/even if the facts were being fixed around the policy he *was* still working for peace.


:grr:


On edit: Changed emoticon - I am ticked!