Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do our candidates pick bad staffers, while Repukes pick good ones?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 07:23 PM
Original message
Why do our candidates pick bad staffers, while Repukes pick good ones?
This is the usual excuse for why we "lose". I'm just wondering why, if this is correct, do Dems have such bad luck or bad taste when picking staffers for their campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Shoeempress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think we are still fighting a gentleman's battle against street fighters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So maybe we need to pick street fighter staffers?
I would agree with that. The question remains why haven't Dem candidates gotten the memo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoeempress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Damned if I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoeempress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Damned if I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fascist stormtroopers are NOT "good" staffers.
They are simply psychos who have found employment in a difficult economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. But they win elections and put Repukes in power.
Our staffers lose elections. No matter how much we complain that they are scumbags we're left to deal with the hideous results of their actions. How do we combat this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. Follow the money.
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 03:12 AM by ReadTomPaine
Republican staffers get book deals and wealth if they do well. Dem staffers get coffee. The Dem establishment needs to start to pony up for the talent, and open up the cliqish, aging party infrastructure.

When a rightwinger goes on a limb for the party, they know they are covered and always have a paycheck and a place waiting for them. Dems get vilified and lose their jobs for doing the same.

We will win the government back when we want it more than they do, and not a moment before. This is a big part of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. Because Bob Shrum is the Dem "kingmaker"
He has run all the recent campaigns, except for Clinton's.

Shrummy loses everytime, but hey, that's ok, because he's the go-to guy.

And he has been VERY well paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. All the really good ratfuckers were taken
We got all the "nice" ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Lol! That does say it all!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. Not all
While there are certainly some who just totally suck, I have also personally met others who really rocked.

The guy who headed the advance team for the Kerry campaign last year, he has worked for Kerry for 15 years, he was wonderful! I couldn't have been more impressed with him. I'd like to see him on TV over some of those who usually "represent" us.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. Read this article:
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 08:25 AM by Totally Committed
Bottom line: You get what you pay for. Republicans raise the most money, so they can hire the most expensive whores. It will disturb, appal, and disgust you.

Excerpt:

All-Republican lobbying firms have boosted their rates the most. Fierce, Isakowitz & Blalock and the Federalist Group report that at the end of the Clinton administration, $20,000 a month was considered high. Now, they say, retainers of $25,000 to $40,000 a month are customary for new corporate clients, depending on how much work they do.

Such fee inflation is widespread, even by newcomers. Venn Strategies LLC, a bipartisan lobbying firm that opened in 2001, has doubled its retainer for new clients. "When we first started, most of them came in at $7,500 a month or $10,000 a month," said Stephanie E. Silverman, a principal in the firm. "Now retainers are more in the $15,000- and $25,000-a-month range."

Corporate clients accept the extra cost as the price of success in Washington. At the turn of the year, the American Ambulance Association decided to step up its lobbying and switched to Patton Boggs LLP, the Capitol Hill powerhouse, from a smaller lobbying shop across town. In the process it boosted its lobbying budget by about a third, to more than $300,000 a year.

"It is essential we have a very strong presence," said Robert L. Garner, president of the association. "It's pricey, but it's the cost of doing business in the federal environment."

Entire article:

The Road to Riches Is Called K Street
Lobbying Firms Hire More, Pay More, Charge More to Influence Government

By Jeffrey H. Birnbaum
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, June 22, 2005

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/21/AR2005062101632.html

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. That was a truly horrifying article.
I don't know how one combats such corruption without being part of it. Then there's the question of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I agree...
I couldn't eat my breakfast after reading that.

Disgusting. No wonder the state of politics in this country is what it is today.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC