This is fucking horrible because unlike other major urban areas, DC has no say in the laws that are passed for their city since DC is basically 'taxation without representation' and get their laws given to them by a congress that they have no representation in it.
Kay, if you want to be a pistol packing mama, then why not move your home out of DC and into Rick Santorum (R-PA) home state of Virginia. Big Cities want and need different gun laws than suburban/rural areas.
This bill, unfortunately, will probably pass making it 1000% more unsafe in a city that doesn't need anymore guns flooding its streets - especially concealled weapons
:cry:
http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/this_just_in/documents/04776528.aspGUN CONTROL
Re-arming DC: Senators want to pack heat in capitalBY DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
As a US Senator from Texas, Kay Bailey Hutchison splits time between her home state, where she is allowed to own practically any weapon invented and can even carry a concealed handgun, and the District of Columbia, where she can’t even keep a .357 Magnum in her house. For 12 years she has managed to abide this without complaint, but apparently she’s had enough. In May, she filed a bill to overturn DC’s gun-control laws, and this week she indicated that she has more than 30 co-sponsors and intends to push it to the floor for a vote in the near future.
The bill would, in one swoop, negate all the gun laws the district has adopted over the past 30 years, including pre-purchase criminal-background checks and bans on semi-automatic weapons and cop-killer bullets. If it passes the Senate, it is expected to breeze through the House, which passed a similar bill last September.
In the press release announcing the bill, Hutchison is quoted saying, apparently without irony: "The rights guaranteed by the Constitution do not end at the borders of Washington, DC."
In fact, the bill is an example of the opposite: unlike everyone else in North America, DC residents can have their own local laws rewritten by a group — the US Congress — in which they cannot elect a voting member.