Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"I respectfully decline"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:45 AM
Original message
"I respectfully decline"
In the Indian affairs committee hearings Sen. John McCain is seen grilling associates of Abramoff.

To each and every question the two witnesses "respectfully declined to answer on the basis of their 5th amendment rights. Entirely constitutional and legal.

Also, very remindful of the "Watergate" and "Arms for Hostages" scandals. Who will this new scandal bring down? How high will it go? Who will fall on their swords?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm watching it now.
I felt like slapping those associates silly every time they said "I respectfully," etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AUYellowDog Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. very very amusing n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. whole lotta CYA going on
and 5th Amendment pleas.

hehehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. "I'm embarassed and disgusted to be part of this all"
Edited on Sun Jun-26-05 10:56 AM by FLDem5
what was the word he used and what does it mean, anyone?

David Grosh quoted a word in a Native American language and said it described them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AUYellowDog Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I heard it
but don't know the word. All of these people pleading the 5th are screwed.

Brandon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I don't know if spelling is correct but the word sounded like
Waukesu or wakesu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I believe I heard it translated...
...as grease eater or fat eater, meaning someone who grabbed all the good stuff from the communal foodpot....VERY apropos...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I didn't watch this from the beginning, can anyone
Edited on Sun Jun-26-05 11:08 AM by POAS
tell me if any Native Americans have appeared yet?

At least by appearance none of these folk seem to be native.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AUYellowDog Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. So far no n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. their attorneys were on - I think there was Native American on that panel
but by the time I had it turned on, he wasn't saying anything anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AUYellowDog Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. The guy
who is talking right now is fucking hilarious. So, in his own words, the head of this conservative think tank is your "average beach bum".

Brandon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Yes, I was in another room when I heard him
and had to rush to the TV to see if this guy was for real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. I didn't just crawl out of a cotton patch
I gotta remember that line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
14. Maybe it's not right but when I hear someone plead the 5th... (& ?)
I hear in my mind "because I'm somehow: involved in this/have plenty of knowledge of/guilty of this illegal activity".

My mind seems to have hit a brick wall with this and if there is a legitimate reason I truly would like to know: is there ever reason an innocent person would be advised to plead the 5th (or respectfully decline)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yes, if the inquiry is part of a witch hunt
such as the McCarthy hearings.

At some point in the future assume the Democratic party is outlawed. Now you are called to a Santorum hearing in the Senate and he askes, "Are you now or have you ever been a Democrat?"

Out of fear of the Gulag Gitmo do you answer honestly or plead the 5th?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PermanentRevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Unfortunately...
I'm sure by then the PATRIOT ACT III will have disbanded the Bill of Rights as a hindrance to national security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. That's an example that I'd be guilty of but..
may not necessarily want to openly admit it (although there's enough evidence proving that I am so why bother not). I think in your case scenario if I did decide to use the term "I respectfully decline" it would be used with my mind quite probably exchanging that phrase for a more appropriate "F you".

Yoru example did bring to mind however the McCarthy Trials where those being questioned knew that whatever they said they were already considered "guilty" in the minds of those asking the questions. Whatever they said would be twisted back against them by the warped mind that was McCarthy's et al.

My guess is the folks using "I respectfully decline" at this hearing fall more into the "F you" category though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. It helps to read the 5th Amendment when this comes up:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

The part in bold is what they are exercising.

It's an important right, but you really are saying you did some criminal shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC