In the wake of today's SCOTUS ruling, I found this from last week. Interesting, eh?
http://www.news-record.com/news/local/quran_061905_online.htmAn AOC lawyer's preliminary opinion last week said that state law allows people to be sworn in using a Quran rather than a Bible, Ellis said. But that conflicts with the view of top Guilford County judges, who told officials with the Islamic center Friday that they won't allow the practice in their courtrooms.
"An oath on the Quran is not a lawful oath under our law," Guilford Senior Resident Superior Court Judge W. Douglas Albright said earlier in the week. He sets policy for the county's nine Superior Court courtrooms.
<...>
Muslims, and anyone else who may object to swearing on the Bible, have other options to taking an oath. They can raise their hand and give an affirmation to tell the truth, which is treated the same by law.
<...>
Last year a district judge who presided in counties including Davidson and Iredell asked court officials to remove references to God when he entered the courtroom or during oaths. The chief justice of the state Supreme Court called Judge James M. Honeycutt's decision "deplorable," and the court eventually ordered him to reverse his policy.