WaPo's Frankel writing today about DSM and British Doubts on Iraq War

[flpoljunkie]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/27/AR2005062701584_pf.html

From Memos, Insights Into Ally's Doubts On Iraq War
British Advisers Foresaw Variety of Risks, Problems

By Glenn Frankel
Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, June 28, 2005; A01

LONDON -- In the spring of 2002, two weeks before British Prime Minister Tony Blair journeyed to Crawford, Tex., to meet with President Bush at his ranch about the escalating confrontation with Iraq, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw sounded a prescient warning.

"The rewards from your visit to Crawford will be few," Straw wrote in a March 25 memo to Blair stamped "Secret and Personal." "The risks are high, both for you and for the Government."

In public, British officials were declaring their solidarity with the Bush administration's calls for elimination of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. But Straw's memo and seven other secret documents disclosed in recent months by British journalist Michael Smith together reveal a much different picture. Behind the scenes, British officials believed the U.S. administration was already committed to a war that they feared was ill-conceived and illegal and could lead to disaster.

The documents indicate that the officials foresaw a host of problems that later would haunt both governments -- including thin intelligence about the nature of the Iraqi threat, weak public support for war and a lack of planning for the aftermath of military action. British cabinet ministers, Foreign Office diplomats, senior generals and intelligence service officials all weighed in with concerns and reservations. Yet they could not dissuade their counterparts in the Bush administration -- nor, indeed, their own leader -- from going forward.

much more...long article

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/27/AR2005062701584_pf.html

[trumad]

1. Great piece

and it just confirms that Blair is Dubya's Poodle.

[flpoljunkie]

3. Yep! It also reiterates that the authenticy of DSM is unquestioned.

This article is based on those memos, supplemented by interviews with officials on both sides of the Atlantic -- none of whom was willing to be cited by name because of the sensitivity of the issue -- and written accounts. Spokesmen for the Foreign Office and the prime minister's office declined to comment but did not question the authenticity of the documents.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/27/AR2005062701584_pf.html

_________________

George "War is the last resort" Bush misled this nation into war. This, from the oil and gas president who promised he would "restore honor and integrity to the White House."

[GCP]

2. The article sums the whole thing up precisely

Let's see if this gets any traction - not holding my breath.

[flpoljunkie]

4. It is on page one of the Washington Post and not buried, like in the past

From Memos, Insights Into Ally's Doubts On Iraq War

British Advisers Foresaw Variety of Risks, Problems

By Glenn Frankel
Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, June 28, 2005; Page A01

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/27/AR2005062701584.html