Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Novak: RW outraged over pro-choice Gonzales for Supreme Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:49 PM
Original message
Novak: RW outraged over pro-choice Gonzales for Supreme Court
http://www.suntimes.com/output/novak/cst-edt-novak27.html

Gonzales for top court rankles right

BY ROBERT NOVAK
SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

It was not merely a leak from the normally leak-proof Bush White House. For more than a week, a veritable torrent has tipped Attorney General Alberto Gonzales as President Bush's first nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. It has sent the conservative movement into spasms of fear and loathing.

Gonzales long has been unacceptable to anti-abortion activists because of his record as a Texas Supreme Court justice. Beyond pro-lifers, he is opposed by organized conservative lawyers. Ironically, the same Bush supporters who have been raising money and devising tactics for the mother of all judicial confirmation fights are in a panic that Gonzales will be named. With the president's popularity falling among his conservative base as well as the general populace, a politically disastrous moment may be at hand.

< snip >

If opposition to abortion is Bush's preeminent social conservative position, Gonzales is a most improbable choice. He could not bring himself to support parental notification on the Texas Supreme Court. While professing to be anti-abortion, he maintains Roe vs. Wade is inviolable.

Conservatives fear Gonzales will be another in a long line of justices who have proved more liberal than the president who appointed them expected -- John Paul Stevens, O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter. That is a view widely held inside the White House, but not by the occupant who counts most. Bush loves Gonzales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jedr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dems outraged that Bob Novak isn't in jail!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't throw me into the briar patch!
Divert.

Obfuscate.

Confuse.

repeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firenze777 Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. I dunno
I really think Gonzales is AG because he's the one that decides if a Special Prosecutor is appointed in any administration investigation. That is immediately more important to Bush than a SCOTUS appt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gay Green Donating Member (485 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Much as I don't like Gonzales becoming a Justice at the SCOTUS,
I can't help but laugh at the screams of outrage from the fristian right who trusted Shrub all this time.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. True
If the anti-abortion folks can't even get Bush to name someone to overturn Roe, it's gotta be awfully demoralizing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Unless this is just spin to take the wind out of the sails of Dems
who would object to Gonzales on the SC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC