Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are the Chinese smarter than we are?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 03:05 PM
Original message
Are the Chinese smarter than we are?

There's a lot of concern about the Chinese bid to buy Unocal.

Can some brilliant DUers tell me how much oil Iraq had prior to our invasion, and what the highest market price for oil was at that time?

My guess is that it might have been a lot cheaper to simply buy up all their oil, than to go to war for it. Unless, of course, we actually tried and Sadaam refused to sell. In that case I can see why regime change seemed both necessary and urgent to BFEE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Invasions can be accomplished through many means.
And wasn't Lao Tsu Chinese?

With that many people, all you have to be is patient. A slow invasion could be most effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yes. The founder of Taoism
Ironically, his distant decendant Sun Tzu would write the greatest book of combat theory ever and his great (x6) grandson Sun Qian would make his name at the outbreak of the Three Kingdoms war by crushing the Yellow Turban rebellion of the Taoist peasantry using that combat theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. That's it, Sun Tzu.
I'm into comparative religion, not war, except to end war.. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Another shot across the bow in our resource wars
This is our life from now on: Staggering from conflict to conflict in a vain attempt to secure a vital resource.

As Jared Diamond points out in "Collapse", many civilizations doomed themselves by over consumption of local resources (food, water). Oil is now an intricate part of our economy and any threat to its supply will have serious ramifications for our nation's economic health.

All of the major, first-world countries understand the need for resources. Unfortunately, our need for them does not make them easy to obtain by any means. Nearly all of the oil we need is located under countries hostile to us.

Are we having fun yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Oh, sure.

Since gas prices have risen since the invasion, and international hostility to us has increased, we'd better be having fun, because it looks like the party's almost over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Our fearless leaders are playing checkers. The rest of the world...
plays chess.

I don't think that's because we're inherently dumber than anybody else, but we are in the grip of various ideologies that cause us to act dumber. Which is just as bad. Stupid is as stupid does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naturalselection Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just read Chevron
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stinkeefresh Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. my favorite analysis of China
is by David Bowie

"I'll give you television
I'll give you eyes of blue
I'll give you man who wants to rule the world...

But when I get excited
my little China girl says
'oh baby. just you shut your mouth.'
she says:
'shhh.'"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snickersnee Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. no, but they apparently have redundant error-checking
...built right in, as i've often heard that a billion of them can't be wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bballny Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Being Chinese
of course we are. Seriously, here is a little dirty secret of Asians. We are taught from early childhood that we are smarter. Maybe were not but education is stressed in the Asian culture. Jewish culture is the same. The similarities in the cultures is obvious. I ended up growing up in a Jewish clique where the art of verbal battle is highly regarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. It's "we're".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opstachuck Donating Member (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
25. should be "similarities... ARE obvious" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. hardly, the chinese are acting like a team, the west like individuals
Edited on Thu Jun-30-05 07:29 PM by kodi
today, max baucus in the senate made the analogy that the chinese (and japanese) were acting like a well-organized football team with a plan, and a coach and all the players knew their roles; whereas the americans were 11 individuals who were arguing over who played where, and who made the decisions.

its clear that both china and japan (and tiawan, korea, and singapore for that matter) have a national economic policy using education, tax incentives and government attitudes that support national mercentile policies.

the USA is so far behind this approach because it allegedly is at cross purposes with that great myth of the rugged individual.

but, those times never were and evoking any such foolishness is deadly for future economic health.

the US needs a program of national socialism. the name of course is historically poisonous, but the means it describes for the america of the 21st century refers to a national health program for ALL, first-rate education for ALL, a living wage for ALL, economic democracy for ALL and a national economic policy that lifts ALL.

i know smart chinese, i know stupid ones.

i know smart japanese, i know stupid ones.

i know smart jews, i know stupid ones.

i know smart whites, i know stupid ones.

i know smart blacks, i know stupid ones.

i know smart americans, i know stupid ones.

it all comes down to motivation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You're right about the name being poisonous.

I remember someone telling me that they thought everyone should have access to good health care, but that they were opposed to socialized medicine.

I was too dumbfounded to respond.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Isn't that the answer?
It all comes down to motivation.

The history of the world is that countries rise to prominance, then they get fat and lazy, and other more motivated people pass them by.

It seems a natural process that is happening to us just like it happened to so many others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. They are raised to be highly focused and productive...
and, they don't have to worry about who's in power... they have no control over it.

We, on the other hand, are raised to think we are free, and "the pursuit of happiness" is guaranteed to us. We are given the illusion that we elect our government, so we feel a certain level of responsibility for who represents us. All of these things, I feel, keep us from being focused and truly productive ala the Chinese. And, when those things don't take out eyes off the ball and confuse us, we have the Bushistas' Terror Attack warnings...

The Chinese would never put up with all this bullshit. That's why they will probably be a "Superpower" before we know it.

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Yes, freedom and security are often a trade-off.

Only in our case we've managed to trade less freedom for less security.

Good post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbeach Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. No.More patient..
usa,britain and israel have sold them dangerous technology...

and with bush the traitor running the show..
china is less fearful of the usa

they have recently made pals with iran..wonder why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brindis_desala Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Iraq has at minimum 115 billion barrels of oil reserves PLUS
trillions of cubic meters of natural gas worth gazillions, but price was not the issue. It's about CONTROL. Hussein did not help himself by trying to price Iraq's oil in euros. The reason the US can play the bully with a $700billion deficit is because OPEC (thanks to our buddies the Saudis) prices its oil in US dollars. Non-oil producers i.e. most of the developing world has to sell its goods and buy dollars to service its industry or borrow from the World Bank at Mafia rates and conditions. And the World Bank is ... good old Uncle Sam...
But the REAL tragedy of Iraq, which I haven't been able to get DUers to focus on, is the massive corruption and profiteering at outrageous levels being run by Rumsfeld and Cheney. They are the reasons the insurgency is booming and targeting our ill-used soldiers while this robbing the country of its blood and treasure. Meanwhile the CIA is reaping giant windfalls from the Afghan heroine trade and doping the streets of Baghdad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Naomi Klein's article in Harpers (9/04?) tells all about ti
An infuriating must-read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Thank you, I'll do that.

Due to a temporary (hah!) financial difficulty, I had to let my subscription to Harpers lapse, but there's still the library.

What's worse is that I had to let my subscription to Covert Action Quarterly lapse too, and that was the last subscription I had. And my library doesn't have it. Sometimes I go into Borders and skim, but their articles are so dense and fully footnoted that they demand to be studied more than simply perused.

I'll have to check both websites and see how much they have online. I hate being ignorant just because I'm broke.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
19. Smarter, probably not
But they seem to rather outnumber us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
21. They have the quiet ambition of the sleeping giant
whereas we have a cheap pop culture with a crass nationalism to toot to the crowd while the capitalist marauder's reek havoc on the landscape for a pint of black gold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkie Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
22. Saddam wanted you to pay in Euro's,US paying in Euro's for oil=end of USA
its that simple..
and no the chinese arent smarter,they are in it for the long term while most western companies cant seem to think past their next dividend payment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
23. Smaller than the US, but over 4 times the population...
They must be doing something right (if one equates "smarter" with "doing something right").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC