Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove told Miller. Miller told Cooper and Novak.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:20 PM
Original message
Rove told Miller. Miller told Cooper and Novak.
From www.pnionline.com/dnblog/attytood/archives/002161.html (makes sense to me):

Theory on Miller Time

This is how I think it went:

Rove told Judy Miller about Plame. Miller told Cooper and Novak. Novak snitches on Miller to the Grand Jury and goes free.

This morning Miller tells Cooper it's ok to tell the judge it was her. Miller goes to jail because she will not give up Rove.

Miller goes to jail for now. Until Rove gets her off.
Posted by: American Joe at July 6, 2005 08:23 PM

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. makes sense to me too
good hypothesis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
41. interesting concept, could be real scenario..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. And Bolton told Rove.
It just keeps getting deeper. It could be just as you described.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
44. It could just as easily been Cheney who told Rove
so that Rove could pass it on with plausible denialability (sp?)..

Otherwise, I think that's the best hypothesis I've seen so far..

BUt that may not let Rove off the hook for Perjury..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FairGame Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds interesting. Explains how Cooper got released at the last minute
Miller wouldn't send Cooper to jail.

Rove is fair game. Send him to jail, impeach Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. noooo - there's another WH source who was spreading the outing
of Plame. Fitzgerald says he knows who it is...but has to have
the testimony of Miller. Which is true. If hee's the prosecutor he
can't get up on the stand and testify himself.

I think we should have a betting pool.

Cheney?

Libby?

Bolton?

Newt Gingrich?



who knows how to make one of those poll things.

Find Dwickham, he always does them really good,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pk_du Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I'm with you on this one Pallas180
Nofacts said "two whitehouse sources"

Cooper has one call him today (Rove) and give him the okay. ( cos he knows Coopers emails finger him anyway - and they are already out)

Miller didnt get such a call - because her source is Nofacts other source ( Libby , Bolton , Cheney - take you pick) - they have all denied under oath so that means perjury charge for the second source when found/proven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. It's possible Rove would rat on the other source
in a plea bargain. And they all came tumblin' down...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Libby signed a release too for some
of the people called in to testify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Malloy just voted for Cheney
I think it was all of them. They all had a meeting after the Wilson column and decided as a group to out Plame. The only thing I can't figure out is why they thought they wouldn't get caught. Maybe it's just arrogance and/or stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Nobody's caught yet
and it will be very disappointing if Rove somehow finds the fortitude to take the fall for Cheney and/or Junior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. tridim, exactly my thought - they all had a meeting laughing about
how they were going to fix Wilson's wagon by outing the wife -
and Cheney and his crew had been hanging around the analysts at the
CIA, trying to intimidate them into saying Saddam had WMD...

but Valerie Plame's job was to trace and stop proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Cheney's bunch, Bolton, Libby, Rumsfeld were pro proliferation of nukes and Cheney when CEO of Halliburton had been fined millions for selling nuke components from offshore address....and so did Rumsfeld's Swiss company.......

think about it - two birds with one stone. Stop Plame from being on his trail by outing her, and fixing her husband's wagon.

nasty stuff. It was one of Cheney's crew which includes Gingrich - people were surprised to see him at the pentagon.....PNAC crew.

But which one.? It just might lead to Cheney and then to Bush knowing because he went to see a famous criminal lawyer .

Hmmmmm. Sound like Cheney's the one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. let me add: Rice, Hadley, and Elliott Abrams ... the whole NSC which
is now the State Dept no less!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. And she looks like the perfect victim of a witch hunt in counterspin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FairGame Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Rove and Libby plant peices of the story to differnet reporters.
Miller, Cooper and Novak. Was Cooper brought in by Miller or did Scooter Libby get to him. What did Libby do other than supply Plames name to Rove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mt1000 Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Palme husband Wilson's interview TODAY

Joseph Wilson was interviewed by Citizens For Legitimate Government
. . . a GREAT read! He has all the inside dope - he's Palme's husband.

http://www.legitgov.org/clg_interview_joseph_wilson_060705.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
30. thanks for that mt1000. wilson had some great statements today
welcome to du
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Novak has said he got it from a senior administration official
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FairGame Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. So is that picture for Rove? Easy to see the resmblance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lin Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. aw jeeeze, and it's bedtime too, nightmares for sure (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lin Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. what about Novak's statement today to
Chicago newspaper woman (last name:Marine?) that (parapharsed but to the point) "what happened today has nothing to do with what I know"---of course, I put about this much <-> store in ANYTHING douchebag-for-liberty says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Sr. WH official? That means Cheney or Rove.
for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. But didn't Novak say he talked to two WH officials?
And what ever happened to the 6 or so other "journalists" who got the leak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lin Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. absolutely..."two senior WH officials" (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
read the law first Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. No. Novak specifically said NOT White House
Now, Novak could be lying but he specifically, absolutely said that his two sources were not in the White House in his second column about the matter after the stuff hit the fan. I am 100 % sure of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. I've been thinking. Judy and Cooper holding hands walking down
the steps? Emotionally embracing in the courtroom? Maybe Judy did fall on the sword for Cooper after all. He seemed fairly choked up about the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. Novak's not out of the woods yet.
But I agree that Novak and Rove are the tag team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave502d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. You could be right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. Or...If rove didn't speak to any "reporters" about Plame...
...(as per rove's lawyer), it suggests rove may have leaked to Novak (not a reporter, but a columnist).

Just my two Canadian cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. The way he's been hedging his comments
I wouldn't put it past him to try to pull some crap like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. That dog won't hunt. n/t
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. yep. parsing words. but Novak is a columnist as well as tv poisonality -so
then Rove perjured.

If Martha could go to jail for perjury so could Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #28
43. Novak is a former TV personality - that show was yanked by CNN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. Sounds right.
And that is the way they fixed all the evidence. They had conduits to the newsrooms -- conduits like Judy Miller who shared special information that came from the highest sources in the White House like Rove and Libby and others of that ilk. The reporters down the food chain were delighted to have the tips. They felt privileged to be let in on the stories so they printed them as if they were the unquestioned truth. Miller was one of the major conduits. That is how we got all the Chalabi, WMD and other pre-war, stories. Miller links the DSMs and the Plame matter.

On the other hand, Miller is probably not the target of the probe. She is a witness. I think that if she were being accused of wrongdoing or being a conspirator, the prosecutor would probably handle her differently -- and she could plead the Fifth Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopein08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
29. Perfect scenario...best I've heard yet! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. It's been suggested that nofacts is claiming 5th amendment -
"I refuse to answer on the grounds it may incriminat myself."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
33. naaawww
"Luskin had also noted last week that Rove, like other White House aides, had signed a “waiver” relieving any reporters that he spoke to of any claims of confidentiality. But Cooper said today that such “waivers”—requested by special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s office and distributed by the White House counsel’s office—were “not worth the paper they were written on” because they would inevitably have to be signed under some form of coercion. That’s why Cooper placed such emphasis on receiving the unspecified personal “communication” from the unspecified source."

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8489888/site/newsweek/

so rovie signed a waiver--then why can't judy talk??? (cheney, cheney, cheney...?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
34. Is the outing of Plame actually a crime, and if so, what is it?
I know Bush Snr. said outing a CIA agent amounted to treason, but
is that the law? If it was Rove, what would he be charged with,
and what would be the likely penalty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
read the law first Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Not yet.
Despite all the protestations, nobody's bothering to read the actual law. O'Donnell was right when he said based on what we know right now, no crime was committed. It might turn out that there was one (or more) but right now NOBODY with any knowledge of the law has come out and said definitively that there was a crime committed based on what we currently know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Doesn't it really come down to the level of resistance at the CIA?
Novak claims that the CIA protested mildly; the CIA claims they protested adamently.

This is really one of the more bizarre scandals in recent memory. No one knows who committed the crime, if a crime was even committed. And there is no good explanation as to why the alleged crime was committed in the first instance, aside from simple pettiness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. So it's probably no more than a misdemeanor?
Not good for Rove's credibility, but what does this WH care about
that? Probably no more than a public slap on the wrist from Bush,
and a private wink?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. no, outing a CIA agent is a felony! a federal offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. So Rove could be arrested,
and he could end up doing time? How sweet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
read the law first Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. there are A LOT of conditions in the statute for there to be a crime
The statute has A LOT of conditions. The agent has to be one who is in fact covert. The leaker has to know that the agent is in fact covert. The leaker has to have official access to the information (thus Novak could not have committed a crime). The government has to be taking active steps to conceal the identity of the agent. The leaker has to know that the government is taking active steps to conceal the identity of the agent, etc. It's not as cut and dried as everybody thinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
38. Bullshit
Reporters do not share good information with other reporters if they have not yet published it themselves. That's like cutting your own throat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
39. That seems too cute by half
Wasn't the story that a WH source was shopping this around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
46. Unless Miller is a covert White House operative, it wasn't Miller.
Novak said two administration officials told him. And if Cooper submitted a story to Time based on what another reporter told him, I've got to question his judgement.

What a tangle web we weave when we spin, spin, spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
47. Speaking of Rove,he was supposed to be on an NPR talk show,but isn't.
Which might make it seem like he has something to hide.Friday morning on her NPR show,Diane Rehm announced that Rove told her he'd be a guest on her show sometime this week.Of course,the Lawrence O'Donnell revelation on the McGlaughlin Group aired on Friday night.The Rehm show filled in the last space on this week's schedule on their webpage last night,which was today at 10 AM.I was waiting to see if it would be Rove.It's not.

http://wamu.org/programs/dr/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
49. Why didn't the NYTimes can Miller
after she drummed up a false case for war with the help of Chalabi (who was only feeding them "what they wanted to hear")?

After all, they have fired other journalists for less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
50. I don't think so because (a) there's no reason for Miller to
tell Cooper and Novak and (b) it takes away an excellent "plausibly deniable" part of Rove's lawyer statement, in that if it did happen as you say, Rove DID tell "a reporter" about Plame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC