Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Raw Story - A Rational Voice Now Featured Site at Hated.com

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 11:45 PM
Original message
The Raw Story - A Rational Voice Now Featured Site at Hated.com
NEWS RELEASE

06/7/05


http://hated.com announces that The Raw Story - A Rational Voice ( http://rawstory.com ) has been added to the highly selective list of Featured Most Hated Freedom & Democracy Web Sites and is currently the featured Most Hated web site. Congratulations to The Raw Story and its staff!

Hated.com is the highly respected directory of the most current and most active sites that promote freedom and democracy.

The only site you need to remember — http://hated.comCelebrating 5 years of Serving the Community
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Extend a Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey , thanks for the link
they had some sites that I hadn't seen-- but I was really suprised that they didn't have smirkingchimp.com.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is he making the site "more balanced.""
I noticed this at the blog earlier this evening, and wondered. I always thought of it as a Democratic site, but I admit I never read enough to say for sure.

Someone asked him why there was a hit piece on Dean right under the one about the conference call,and he answered this:

"I'm trying to make the site more balanced -- and
I think it's a fair argument that Dean has mobilized the base on both sides.
If it gets more voters involved in the political system for me to put up two
sides on Dean -- I'm all for it. And what makes me proud is that I get
comments from both sides -"

It just struck me odd, and maybe I had a misconception. I never paid enough attention, just thought it was Democratic. He did change the article, I think to another one. Criticism of Dean is fine, just did not think of it as being beneficial in the way he describes it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC