Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove lied on camera about having "any knowledge" of "the CIA agent".

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 11:35 AM
Original message
Rove lied on camera about having "any knowledge" of "the CIA agent".
Pack your bags you traitorous snake.
_____________________________________

Reporter: Did you have any knowledge or did you leak the name of the CIA agent to the press?
Rove: No.
_______

Rove: Well, I’ll repeat what I said to ABC News when this whole thing broke some number of months ago. I didn’t know her name and didn’t leak her name.
_______

http://thinkprogress.org/2005/07/11/rove-not-careful/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. I did not have sex with that woman.......
hm mm, sounds familiar....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It depends on what your definition of "IS" ... er, "NAME" is.
Since "Joe Wilson's wife" isn't her name, does he thinks this doesn't count as identification and disclosure? Especially since we know that he told Tweety that "Wilson's wife is fair game."

I think this about wraps it up. And I'm sure Fitzgerald knows much more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stumblnrose Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. "I did not have sex with that woman......."
Well that's a line Karl could say without twisting the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. What are we going to tell the children
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ok..
Can we lock the traitor up now?


Is it time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. General Rove? Are you kidding?
Who will direct the Pentagon on defense matters?

Dubya?

:+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jjstopes Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. That isnt a lie, but it is splitting hairs.
He never did leak her name, he said "XXX's Wife", thats why he is getting away with this. If we had him on tape or in an email truely saying her name, then we would have an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh, would...we.
FYI: This just started. Rove is going down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jjstopes Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Gannon? DSM? No WMD? BBV?
The list goes on. How many times did we say "He is going down". 100? 1000?? The problem is we jump on the flavor of the month and never stick to one thing... The DMS is 10000000000000 times more important then this Rove crap. This is what he wants. He wants us to put our efforts into this to take the spotlight off everything else. And in the end we take the bait, he gets away with it, and everything else goes away. You really think Rove would tell the reporter its ok to name the source (him) if he didnt think he would get away with it? Rove lives for this shit.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Unlike many issues, this is tangible and simple.
And this isn't about Bush, it's about Rove.

Rove will resign.

Nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magnolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. It's YOUR bait...
...that we're not going to take.

pssst....you gave yourself away with the "this Rove crap"...it's way more than crap, it's a felony. It's the real deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pgh_dem Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. rrrright...he was talking about Wilson's OTHER wife
The fact that Valerie Plame was Joe Wilson's wife was NOT classified...

Rove is fucked.

Woohoo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. It has no chance of working.
One or more indictments for Rove is nearly certain. One or more indictments for one or more high-ranking administrative official is likely.

The logic is very simple:

If Rove acted alone he made at least SIX calls (six reporters were contacted). Repeatedly and deliberately telling national reporters (at the least) that the Wilson's wife worked at the CIA and "arranged" his trip to Niger shows he KNOWINGLY exposed her identity (it was far from a slip or even a lapse), whether or not he used her name or knew she was covert. In addition, if he was the only primary caller, he would have had to arrange for confirmation by at least one other administration official at least THREE times (for Novak, Cooper, and Miller). (Since he could not control who the reporter would call for confirmation, he likely arranged for three or four others who would willingly--and "knowlingly"--confirm the story.) Therefore he CONSPIRED to expose a CIA official (since he knew the result of his leak would lead to exposure).

If Rove was the only primary source, however, that means he released Matt Cooper from his confidentiality agreement but he did not Judith Miller from hers. The logical reason is that his leak to her included a much more obvious case of illegal activity. Rove's hope, then, is that such a case will never be known. But with the national attention on the Plame matter and, especially, a tenacious and objective prosecutor tracking him down, Rove has little hope (especially with the fact that he had to have done this SIX times and arranged for at least one other to support his story THREE times).

But if Rove was one of at least two or more sources (which would explain why Cooper's released him but Miller's did not release hers), then it's far worse for him since he probably coordinated the entire leak with both planning and foresight (two elements which again indicate that he KNOWINGLY leaked Plame's identity).

Any administrative official originally realizing the Wilson-Plame-CIA link would immediately realize it could discredit Wilson, but much more importantly he would have known who to take the information to, the master of such discreditations (among so much else), Karl Rove. Rove would then insure that the leaks did not overlap and that at least FEW other officials could be counted upon who would readily confirm the information of the original sources (perhaps each having different details or a different slant to make it sound realistic and not a set-up), since he could not insure who the reporter would call for a confirmation.

How do you do ANY of this UNKNOWINGLY?????

Think of the possibilities! At least two indictments for Rove (leaking Plame and leading a conspiracy to leak) and likely indictments (leaking Plame) for other high administrative officials: Rice, Cheney, Libby, etc. Maybe even W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Oh please, oh please, oh please, oh please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaver Tail Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. You could always have this situation
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 12:22 PM by Beaver Tail
Put on your Tin Foil Hats

Leak 1 - Rove: I did not know her name so could not have leaked her name (All I said was Wilson’s Wife was a CIA agent. I never said her name)

Leak 2: All I said was Wilson’s Wife was Plame. I never said she was a CIA agent

Technically nether person is lying in the context of the statements made by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. He didn't have to know her name
All he had to know (or say he knew) is that Ambassador Wilson's wife worked at the CIA; he also said, probably without reason, that she was responsible for sending him to Niger. Obviously, if she had enough influence at the company to determine who goes on what assignment, she was more than a file clerk.

Rove knows what to say and to whom. Notice that Bush is very careful to never flatly state that Saddam was connected to al Qaida or the September 11 attacks; Saddam "hates America" and therefore "is an enemy," just like Osama. Framed this way, invading Iraq didn't necessarily have anything to do with Saddam having a working relationship with any Islamist terror group or even being any kind of threat at all; as we know, Saddam didn't have any working relationship with any Islamist terror group nor was he any kind of threat at all. The just hated America; therefore, in Bush's worldview, it justified invading. I guess that really put any paper tiger who would dare call the USA a Great Satan on notice.

But I digress.

This is my theory, as I said on another thread yesterday:

Rove told reporters just enough to suggest that Wilson's trip to Niger was a junket arranged by his wife at the CIA and that his report said something different than Wilson said it did in his article for The New York Times that appeared on July 6, 2003.

So the reporter to whom Rove spoke knows that Wilson's wife works for the CIA. What is her name and what does she do at the CIA? A good reporter would start researching this. A good reporter would have no trouble finding that Mr. Wilson is married to a lady named Valerie Plame and that she works as an energy analyst for Brewster Jennings & Associates; if the good reporter doesn't already know that Brewster Jennings is a CIA front, he checks out the firm and discovers that Ms. Plame's employer is a not-very-well-disguised CIA front. And why would Ms. Plame list her employer as a CIA front rather than the CIA itself? She would only do that if she's undercover.

In this way, Rove indirectly outed an undercover CIA operative. My bet is that he knew damn good and well that's what he was doing, but it would be hard to prove. As I've said on other posts recently, Rove is really a glorified political hatchet man; it is hard to imagine that he would normally concern himself with who's who at Langley or which diplomat was sent on a special assignment to Niger. Therefore, my guess is also that somebody put him up to this. If Rove didn't know that Ms. Plame was undercover, then he is still enough of a team player to protect whomever put him up to this business. Of course, anybody who thinks it would have made the slightest difference to Rove if he did know Ms. Plame was an undercover operative is naive. Rove can assume, with good reason, that he'll be pardoned in the end; so, he'll keep on protecting his co-conspirators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. The fact that it was repeatedly done (at lest 6 times) = it was deliberate
not to mention the at least 3 confirmations.

Good post. I think Fitzgeral is realing all of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'm rather proud of that theory
It's not a bad conspiracy theory for someone who's usually very skeptical of conspiracy theories.

The fact that it was done six times shows it was deliberate, but that's because Rove wanted somebody to run with the story. The more reporters with whom he planted the story, the more likely it would be printed somewhere.

However, it doesn't prove that Rove knew any more about Mrs. Wilson than thant she worked at the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. treason time.... it's pretty clear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veracity Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
20. but did he lie to the grand jury?
It's not against the law to lie on camera....so long as you're not under oath before an official investaging agency. If he lied to the Grand Jury....he's facing jail time....
but Bush will pardon him ahd life will go on as usual. The WH is filled with felons and criminals. No one seems to be very disturbed by it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. V. Plame ties in directly with DSM.
Fixing the policy for the illegal Invasion of Iraq. Fake docs of Yellow Cake have still not been sourced. State of Union speech mentioning Saddam and request for purchase of unranium was false and the Regime knew it. The goal was to discredit J. Wilson's findings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. Rove is going to wiggle..Rove is going to Squirm..
and they aint gonna make it stick. He'll get dressed down by some Senate committee...maybe...and he won't lose one bit of power. Shrub** jumps when Rove says "Jump!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. but you knew who's wife she is
this is going to be interesting, either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC