All he had to know (or say he knew) is that Ambassador Wilson's wife worked at the CIA; he also said, probably without reason, that she was responsible for sending him to Niger. Obviously, if she had enough influence at the company to determine who goes on what assignment, she was more than a file clerk.
Rove knows what to say and to whom. Notice that Bush is very careful to never flatly state that Saddam was connected to al Qaida or the September 11 attacks; Saddam "hates America" and therefore "is an enemy," just like Osama. Framed this way, invading Iraq didn't necessarily have anything to do with Saddam having a working relationship with any Islamist terror group or even being any kind of threat at all; as we know, Saddam didn't have any working relationship with any Islamist terror group nor was he any kind of threat at all. The just hated America; therefore, in Bush's worldview, it justified invading. I guess that really put any paper tiger who would dare call the USA a Great Satan on notice.
But I digress.
This is my theory, as I said on another thread yesterday:
Rove told reporters just enough to suggest that Wilson's trip to Niger was a junket arranged by his wife at the CIA and that his report said something different than Wilson said it did in his
article for
The New York Times that appeared on July 6, 2003.
So the reporter to whom Rove spoke knows that Wilson's wife works for the CIA. What is her name and what does she do at the CIA? A good reporter would start researching this. A good reporter would have no trouble finding that Mr. Wilson is married to a lady named Valerie Plame and that she works as an energy analyst for Brewster Jennings & Associates; if the good reporter doesn't already know that Brewster Jennings is a CIA front, he checks out the firm and discovers that Ms. Plame's employer is
a not-very-well-disguised CIA front. And why would Ms. Plame list her employer as a CIA front rather than the CIA itself? She would only do that if she's undercover.
In this way, Rove indirectly outed an undercover CIA operative. My bet is that he knew damn good and well that's what he was doing, but it would be hard to prove. As I've said on other posts recently, Rove is really a glorified political hatchet man; it is hard to imagine that he would normally concern himself with who's who at Langley or which diplomat was sent on a special assignment to Niger. Therefore, my guess is also that somebody put him up to this. If Rove didn't know that Ms. Plame was undercover, then he is still enough of a team player to protect whomever put him up to this business. Of course, anybody who thinks it would have made the slightest difference to Rove if he did know Ms. Plame was an undercover operative is naive. Rove can assume, with good reason, that he'll be pardoned in the end; so, he'll keep on protecting his co-conspirators.