Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Pentagon Employee Latest Hire With Ties To Iran-Contra

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 03:52 PM
Original message
New Pentagon Employee Latest Hire With Ties To Iran-Contra
Robert Earl has been hired as chief of staff to Gordon England, acting deputy secretary of Defense.

Ah, but who is Robert Earl? Why, he's the latest Bush Administration appointee with ties to the Iran-Contra scandal.

In 1987, Robert L. Earl told a grand jury that he had destroyed and stolen national security documents while working for Lt. Col. Oliver L. North during the Iran-Contra scandal.

A report to Congress by independent counsel Lawrence E. Walsh stated: "Earl attempted to conceal evidence regarding the arms sales to Iran and the diversion of profits. ... He destroyed documents, assisted North in the destruction of documents … and made false statements to the FBI." Earl was granted immunity for his testimony in the Reagan administration's most damaging scandal and was never prosecuted.

Just the kind of guy you want getting a coveted job in the Pentagon, right? In his new role, Earl has clearance to review the kinds of classified documents he once destroyed.

***

England, who is being reviewed by the Senate to remove the "acting" from his title, has drawn criticism from government ethics watchdogs for the hiring of Earl.

As England goes through his Senate confirmation process, his hiring of Earl has drawn criticism from government ethics watchdogs. But congressional sources said it was unlikely to affect support for England.

On Capitol Hill and in the Pentagon, the few who were aware of Earl's past expressed little concern about his fitness for his current job. And the vice chairman of the congressional committee that investigated the Iran-Contra deal, retired Sen. Warren B. Rudman (R-NH), said he did not expect Earl's past to cause England much trouble in winning confirmation.

"If they've led exemplary lives since then, I think in this country we tend to allow them to make one mistake," Rudman told the Los Angeles Times.

***

According to a story in the July 10 Times, Earl is the latest figure from the Iran-Contra scandal to play a role in the Bush administration.

Others include Elliott Abrams, who pleaded guilty to withholding information from Congress about the illegal funding of the Nicaraguan Contras during the Reagan administration. He now serves on Bush's National Security Council as head of the Mideast bureau. Meanwhile, Retired Adm. John M. Poindexter, who as national security advisor under Reagan also was implicated in the scandal, has periodically served as a consultant to the Pentagon.

The Iran-Contra case involved the U.S. supplying arms to Iran as part of a complicated deal to fund anti-Sandinista Contra rebels in Nicaragua. Congress had forbidden direct U.S. aid to the Contras.

***

This article first appeared on Journalists Against Bush's B.S. (JABBS)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. and why is this Administration so needing the shady cloak and dagger
types? Well, applying Occam's razor, the Principle of Parsimony it would seem the simplest explanation is that they feel the need to do some more shady cloak and dagger work.

But WHERE in the world will the death squads, drug sales and arms for hostages trades be going on???

My fear is the Democratic Minority leaders office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. "My fear is the Democratic Minority leaders office."
What does that mean? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I fear their objective is to attack democrats. Think Oct. surprise
these rw wackos will stop at nothing. I expect them to create circumstances which threaten the integrity of Dem leaders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Ah, I see. A set-up. Projecting their lies and crimes onto others.
Sounds like SOP for the GOP.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. "I think in this country we tend to allow them to make one mistake"
:rofl:

Funniest quote from a repuke in who-knows-how-long!

Are these the same assholes who blather on about "moral relativism," implying that they posess a superior sense of right and wrong?

What utter frauds. The Iran-Contragate perps should have been hung for treason. Instead they're helping to run our country.

:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe they are desperately in need of a
super shredder right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. pretty big real conspiracy
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 05:25 PM by rman
iran-contra that is.
so yes it got exposed and investigated, findings were damning but nothing much came of it. goes to show how powerful they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC